How often shall trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay evaluation of higher education quality assurance organizations in Vietnam be conducted?

How often shall trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay evaluation of higher education quality assurance organizations in Vietnam be conducted?

Pursuant to Article 9 ofCircular 13/2023/TT-BGDDTprescribing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay cycle and evaluation process:

Cycle, Evaluation Process

1. Evaluation Cycle

a) trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay evaluation cycle for domestic education quality assurance organizations is 5 years, conducted before trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay expiration of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay organization's educational quality assurance operation license;

b) trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay evaluation cycle for foreign education quality assurance organizations operating in Vietnam is according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay duration recorded in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay decision recognizing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay educational quality assurance activities in Vietnam.

2. Evaluation Process

a) Self-assessment by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay education quality assurance organization;

b) Evaluation of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay education quality assurance organization by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ministry of Education and Training.

Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay review cycle for higher education quality assurance organizations is 5 years and is conducted before trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay operation license expires.

How often shall trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay evaluation of higher education quality assurance organizations in Vietnam be conducted?​ (Image from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Internet)

What is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay purpose of evaluating higher education quality assurance organizations in Vietnam?

Pursuant to Article 3 ofCircular 13/2023/TT-BGDDTregarding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay purpose of monitoring and evaluation:

Purpose of Monitoring and Evaluation

1. Purpose of Monitoring

a) Early detection and prevention of violations;

b) Helping education quality assurance organizations promptly adjust activities to comply with legal regulations;

c) Serving as a basis for evaluating education quality assurance organizations and for recommendations to build and adjust policies on quality assurance and education quality assurance.

2. Purpose of Evaluation

a) Ensuring compliance with legal regulations and accountability of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay education quality assurance organization;

b) Serving as a basis for education quality assurance organizations to improve and enhance quality;

c) Serving as a basis for educational institutions to choose educational quality assurance organizations;

d) Serving as a basis for extending trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay operation license or recognizing educational quality assurance activities for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay quality assurance organization.

Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay purpose of evaluating higher education quality assurance organizations is to:

- Ensure compliance with legal regulations and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay accountability of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay education quality assurance organization;

- Serve as a basis for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay education quality assurance organization to improve and enhance quality;

- Serve as a basis for educational institutions to select an educational quality assurance organization;

- Serve as a basis for extending trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay operation license or recognizing educational quality assurance activities for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay quality assurance organization.

What are trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay evaluation levels for higher education quality assurance organizations in Vietnam?

Pursuant to Article 12 ofCircular 13/2023/TT-BGDDT:

Evaluation Levels for Criteria, Standards, and Quality Assurance Organizations

1. Evaluation of Criteria

a) Criteria in each standard are evaluated as either met or not met;

b) A criterion is evaluated as met when trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay education quality assurance organization meets all trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay requirements of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay criterion.

2. Evaluation of Standards

a) Standards are evaluated as either met or not met;

b) Standard 1 is evaluated as met when criteria 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 are evaluated as met; Standard 2 is evaluated as met when criteria 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 are evaluated as met; Standard 4 is evaluated as met when criteria 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5 are evaluated as met;

c) Standards 3 and 5 are evaluated as met when all criteria in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay standard are evaluated as met.

3. Evaluation of Education Quality Assurance Organization

a) Education quality assurance organizations are evaluated at one of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay levels: not met, level 1 met, or level 2 met;

b) trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay organization is evaluated as not met if one or more standards are evaluated as not met;

c) trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay organization is evaluated as level 1 met if all standards are evaluated as met, with some criteria evaluated as not met;

d) trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay organization is evaluated as level 2 met if all criteria are evaluated as met.

Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay evaluation levels for higher education quality assurance organizations are one of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay levels: not met, level 1 met, or level 2 met.

- An organization is evaluated as not met if one or more standards are evaluated as not met;

- An organization is evaluated as level 1 met if all standards are evaluated as met, with criteria evaluated as not met;

- An organization is evaluated as level 2 met if all criteria are evaluated as met.