vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayPrecedent no. 06/2016/AL on dispute over inheritance dispute

In a case of inheritance dispute in which certain heirs are living abroad, if vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court conducted vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judicial assistance and took evidence as per vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law but failed to determine addresses of these heirs, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court is supposed to keep dealing with vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay plaintiff; if vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate and line of succession can be identified and vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay deceased has no will, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay inheritance shall be divided to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay plaintiff as per vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law; vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay portions of inheritance of absent heirs whose addresses cannot be identified shall be temporarily handed over to those who live in Vietnam for management and then be returned to them later.

Representation of Mr. Vu Dinh Hung in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition dated July 1993:

His parent Mr. Vu Dinh Quang and Mrs. Nguyen Thi Thenh had 6 children: Mr. Vu Dinh Duong, Mrs. Vu Thi Cam, Mrs. Vu Thi Thao, Mrs. Vu Thi Tien (or Mrs. Hien) and Mrs. Vu Thi Hau. Mr. Quang and Mrs. Thenh had a house at 66 Dong Xuan Street, Hoan Kiem district, Hanoi with area of 123m2. In 1979, Mr. Quang died without a will, Mrs. Thenh and 3 children: Mr. Hung, Mrs. Hau, Mrs. Tien have lived there since then; Mr. Duong, Mrs. Thao and Mrs. Cam all have leaved Vietnam to live abroad. In vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay family meeting minutes dated October 28, 1982, Mrs. Thenh and Mr. Hung, Mrs. Tien, Mrs. Hau reached a temporary agreement to split vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house into 3 parts for them. In 1987, Mrs. Thenh died. In 1989, Mrs. Tien sneakily sold vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house temporarily divided to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh.  On October 31, 1993, although Mr. Hung filed a petition for division of inheritance with vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court, Mrs. Hau still kept selling vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house temporarily divided to Mrs. Ha Thuy Linh. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sale of these parts of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house is illegal. Mr. Hung have obtained a document confirming that Mr. Duong, Mrs. Cam and Mrs. Thao mutually agree to cede their inheritances to him. So, he requests division of inheritance at law.

Mr. Hung presents photocopies of Letters of Authorization made on March 3, 1992 by Mr. Vu Dinh Duong, on May 1, 1993 by Mrs. Vu Thi Cam, on October 28, 1991 by Mrs. Vu Thi Thao, all confirming that they authorize Mr. Hung to take care of their property in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 66 Dong Xuan equivalent to 1/6 of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house. After filing vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition, Mr. Hung present additional documents: Letters of Permanent Transfer of Inheritance Rights made on April 25, 1995 by Mr. Vu Dinh Duong, on May 10, 1995 by Mrs. Vu Thi Cam, and by Mrs. Vu Thi Thao; these documents were made abroad, all confirming that: vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay parent left vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 66 Dong Xuan to 6 children, but Mrs. Tien (Hien) and Mrs. Hau selling a part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house failed to follow vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay mother’s advice (not to sell or allow strangers to live in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house)… Mr. Duong, Mrs. Thao and Mrs. Cam hereby make these documents, permanently transferring 1/6 of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 66 Dong Xuan equivalent to their inheritances to Mr. Hung in order for him to maintain ancestor worship at vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house where vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay three families abroad could go to worship ancestors; besides, they request vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court to allow Mr. Hung receive vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay inheritance in kind (all documents presented by Mr. Hung are photocopies).

Representation of defendant:

Representation of Mrs. Vu Thi Tien: She agrees with Mr. Hung’s representation about consanguinity and vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay origin of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 66 Dong Xuan. In 1989, she sold vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house divided to Mrs. Oanh, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house was handed over and vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house sale paperwork was completed at vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Hanoi Land Department. After moving to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house, Mrs. Oanh also reached an agreement with Mr. Hung and Mrs. Hau to convert some facilities in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house for more convenient use. Subsequently, Mr. Hung filed a complaint to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Hanoi Land Department so vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house sale paperwork between Mrs. Tien and Mrs. Oanh was revoked. Mrs. Hau also sold vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay divided part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house to another person. She stated that Mrs. Thenh gave money to 3 children going abroad, so they do not make any claim for this house. She sold her part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house to Mrs. Oanh, so she assumes no liability whatsoever for vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sold part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house.

Representation of Mrs. Vu Thi Hau: She agrees with Mr. Hung’s representation about consanguinity and vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay origin of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house 66 Dong Xuan and vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mrs. Tien’s representation about division of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house. She stated that she notified her siblings living abroad of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sale of her part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and obtained their consent. She requests to divide vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house that she sold to Mrs. Linh and Mr. Khoi.

Representation of persons with relevant rights and obligations:

Representation of Mrs. Ha Thuy Linh and Mr. Hoang Manh Khoi: They mutually bought vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house based on vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay family meeting minutes given by Mrs. Hau. They made vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay payment in full and have lived in that house up to now, so they request vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court to legalize their part of house bought from Mrs. Hau.

Representation of Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh: On October 18, 1992, she bought vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house divided to Mrs. Tien for VND 30,000,000. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sale was permitted by competent authority. After vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase, she moved to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house, had an agreement to convert some facilities in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house with Mr. Hung, so she requests vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court to recognize vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house sale contract entered between Mrs. Tien and Mrs. Oanh.

In vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance civil judgment No. 20/DSST dated May 23, 1995, People’s Court of Hanoi City accepted vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition for division of inheritance made by Mr. Hung, Mr. Duong, Mrs. Cam , Mrs. Thao with vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay representation of Mr. Hung, requesting division of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Quang and Mrs. Thenh. accepting a part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay will made by Mrs. Thenh on October 28, 1982, stating that vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay value of estate is VND 1,228,151,520 and vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land and house shall be divided among 3 children: Mr. Hung, Mrs. Hau and Mrs. Tien. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house sale between Mrs. Tien, Mrs. Hau with Mrs. Oanh, Mrs. Linh was conducted in accordance with regulations of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay state.

Mrs. Tien filed an appeal, requesting reconsideration of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay way to calculate vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay area of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate. Mr. Hung also filed an appeal, claiming that vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court heard vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case in an impartial manner.

At vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate civil judgment No. 115 dated October 10, 1995, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Court of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court in Hanoi judged: quashing vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment, transferring vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Hanoi City for conducting another first instance trial.

In vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance civil judgment No. 50/DSST dated September 11, 1996, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Hanoi City accepted vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition for division of inheritance made by Mr. Hung, Mr. Duong, Mrs. Cam, Mrs. Thao with vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay representation of Mr. Hung, requesting division of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate of Mr. Quang and Mrs. Thenh; recognized vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay voluntary consent of Mr. Duong, Mrs. Cam, Mrs. Thao to transfer their inheritances to Mr. Hung and divide inheritance in kind to Mr. Hung, Mrs. Hau, Mrs. Tien (each person receives 1/3 of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay shop and vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay rear part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house), Mrs. Hau and Mrs. Tien must pay vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay difference to Mr. Hung (Mrs. Hau VND 156,824,381; Mrs. Tien VND 140,774,106). vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house sale between Mrs. Tien, Mrs. Hau and Mrs. Oanh, Mrs. Linh is considered illegal.

vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mr. Hung filed an appeal thereafter.

In vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay decision No. 82/TDC dated July 15, 1997, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Court of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court of Hanoi City suspended settlement of this case.

After effective date ofResolution No. 1037/2006/NQ-UBTVQH11dated July 27, 2006 of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Standing Committee of National Assembly on housing-related civil transactions established before July 1, 1991 involving foreign Vietnamese, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Court of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court of Hanoi resumed settlement of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case.

In vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate civil judgment No. 142/2007/DSPT dated July 3, 2007, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Court of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court of Hanoi quashed vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment and transferred to case file to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Hanoi City to conduct another first instance trial: While vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition was solely written and signed by Mr. Hung, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Letters of Authorization made by Mr. Duong, Mrs. Thao, Mrs. Cam fail to present vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorization to file for a petition for division of inheritance (except for vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Letter made by Mrs. Thao), involved parties all recognize that Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao died, therefore it is required to verify it and involve their heirs to participate in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legal proceedings; and vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate must be re-valued appropriately.

After vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case was re-accepted, litigants stated that Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao died in 2002. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court requested Mr. Hung to present their death certificates and file another lawsuit petition in accordance with Clause 2 Article 164 of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code (full name, address, nationality of children of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao; name and address of persons living in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay disputed part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house) but Mr. Hung failed to present them with vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court.

In vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Decision No. 04/2008/QDST-DS dated January 17, 2008, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Hanoi City terminated settlement of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case and returned vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court fee to Mr. Hung.

On January 29, 2008, Mr. Hung filed an appeal, claiming that vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay aforesaid termination is improper.

In vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Decision No. 168/2008/DS-QDPT dated September 4, 2008, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Court of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court of Hanoi accepted vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal made by Mr. Hung, overruled vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment with vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay following reasons: vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court applying Clause 2 Article 192 to terminate settlement of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case is wrong, depriving litigants of their right to file vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit.

After re-accepting vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Hanoi City requested Mr. Hung to present documents containing name, age, address of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay heirs of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao; letters to authorize acceptance or refusal of their inheritances; name and address of persons who live in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house of Mrs. Oanh. Mr. Hung failed to present above documents.

In vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Decision No. 54/DS-ST dated September 30, 2009, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Hanoi City judged: Terminate settlement of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case, return vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition and evidenced enclosed to Mr. Hung.

vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mr. Hung filed an appeal thereafter.

In vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Judgment No. 44/2010/QD-PT dated March 9, 2010, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Court of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court in Hanoi judged: Uphold vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment.

Mr. Hung filed for cassation trial.

In vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Decision No. 35/2013/KN-DS dated January 22, 2013, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Chief Justice of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court appealed Decision No. 44/2010/QD-PT dated March 9, 2010 of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Court of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court of Hanoi. Request vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Council of Judges of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court to adjudicate cassation trial, override above appellate civil judgment and override vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay decision on termination of first instance settlement No. 54/2009/DS-ST dated September 30, 2009 of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Hanoi City; transfer vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Hanoi City to conduct another first instance trial as per vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.

At vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cassation trial court hearing, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay representative of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Procuracy consents to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal made by vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Chief Justice of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court.

vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house at 66 Dong Xuan Street, Hoan Kiem district, Hanoi City built by Mr. Vu Dinh Quang (died in 1979) and Mrs. Nguyen Thi Thenh (died in 1987). They had 6 children, 3 children Mr. Vu Dinh Duong, Mrs. Vu Thi Cam and Mrs. Vu Thi Thao have lived abroad since 1979, 3 children Mr. Vu Dinh Hung, Mrs. Vu Thi Tien (Hien), Mrs. Vu Thi Hau have lived in Vietnam. After Mr. Quang died, only Mrs. Thenh, Mr. Hung, Mrs. Tien and Mrs. Hau have lived in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house. After Mrs. Thenh died, Mr. Hung, Mrs. Tien and Mrs. Hau arbitrarily divided in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house into 3 parts for them. On October 18, 1992, Mrs. Tien sold her part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh and on October 31, 1993, Mrs. Hau sold her part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house to Mrs. Ha Thuy Linh.

In 1993, Mr. Hung file a petition for division of inheritance from Mr. Quang and Mrs. Thenh as per vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay settlement of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case lasted from 1993 to 1996 and was suspended at vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate trial stage in 1997. In 2007, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case was re-accepted.

Before settlement of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case, before suspended proceedings (1997), Mr. Hung presented documents and letters of authorization made in 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 by Mr. Duong, Mrs. Cam, Mrs. Thao, stating that they authorized Mr. Hung to take care of their inheritances in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house at 66 Dong Xuan; after that, Mr. Hung presented documents made in 1995 by Mr. Duong, Mrs. Thao and Mrs. Cam, stating that they permanently transfer their inheritances in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay disputed estate. All documents bear stamps and seals of home countries (Mr. Duong lives in England, Mrs. Cam lives in France and Mrs. Thao lives in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay USA), but they are solely photocopies. However, all litigants clearly state house number, address of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay writers. During vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay initiation of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay re-settlement of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case after vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay suspension period, Mr. Hung, Mrs. Tien, and Mrs. Hau all declared that Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao died in 2002, Mr. Hung determined that vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay address of Mrs. Cam and Mrs. Thao remains unchanged but he failed to receive a reply from children of Mr. Duong (vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file page No. 376, 377, 382). vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court requested Mr. Hung to present vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay death certificates of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao; because Mr. Hung failed to provide name and address of children of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao, he requested vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court to take evidence for settlement as prescribed by law (case file page No. 390). Deeming that vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file has address of persons living abroad and vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay three persons living in Vietnam all certify vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay death of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao, so such a request for death certificate is unnecessary. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court was supposed to conduct vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judicial assistance as prescribed, taking evidence to clarify vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay death time of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao and ask their heirs (if any) to give opinions about vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case. Then it shall hear vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case according to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay evidence as vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case may be as prescribed. If it failed to take any new items of evidence, it must deal with vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request made by Mr. Hung to claim inheritance by operation of law, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay inheritances of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao will be temporarily managed by vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay persons living in Vietnam in order for their heirs to receive them by operation of law, it is supposed to be vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay definite resolution of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case. Regarding to persons living in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house sold by Mrs. Tien, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay obligation to give their names and ages falls under Mrs. Tien. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court requesting Mr. Hung to provide details about these persons is wrong because he is not required by law. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court was wrong when terminating vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case based on vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay basis that Mr. Hung failed to provide names and addresses of children of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao, and of persons buying Mrs. Oanh’s part of house. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court upheld vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment while it was supposed to quash vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment to conduct another first instance trial.

In addition, according to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file and deposition of Mr. Hoang Manh Khoi dated October 17, 2007 (case file page No. 373) and “Letter of House Sale” dated October 31, 1993 (case file page No. 18), Mrs. Hau sold her part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house to Mrs. Ha Thuy Linh (Mr. Hoang Manh Khoi’s wife). vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment and appellate judgment all mentioning her as Mrs. Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh is incorrect that needs modification.

According to facts and matters, pursuant to Clause 3 Article 297 and Article 299 of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code;

“vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court was supposed to conduct vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judicial assistance as prescribed, taking evidence to clarify vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay death time of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao and ask their heirs (if any) to give opinions about vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case. Then it shall hear vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case according to vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay evidence as vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case may be as prescribed. If it failed to take any new items of evidence, it must deal with vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request made by Mr. Hung to claim inheritance by operation of law, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay inheritances of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao will be temporarily managed by vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay persons living in Vietnam in order for their heirs to receive them by operation of law, it is supposed to be vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay definite resolution of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case. Regarding to persons living in vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay part of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house sold by Mrs. Tien, vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay obligation to give their names and ages falls under Mrs. Tien. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court requesting Mr. Hung to provide details about these persons is wrong because he is not required by law. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court was wrong when terminating vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case based on vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay basis that Mr. Hung failed to provide names and addresses of children of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao, and of persons buying Mrs. Oanh’s part of house. vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court upheld vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment while it was supposed to quash vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment to conduct another first instance trial.”

1. Overrule Judgment No. 44/2010/QD-PT dated March 9, 2010 of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Supreme People’s Court of Hanoi and overrule Decision on termination of settlement of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case No. 54/2009/DS-ST dated September 30, 2009 of vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Hanoi City concerning vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay inheritance dispute between vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay plaintiff Mr. Vu Dinh Hung and vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mrs. Vu Thi Tien, Mrs. Vu Thi Hau; person with relevant rights and obligations Mr. Vu Dinh Duong, Mrs. Vu Thi Cam, Mrs. Vu Thi Thao, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh, Mrs. Ha Thuy Linh.

2. Refer vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file to People’s Court of Hanoi City for re-conducting vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance trial as per vtv2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.