Precedent No. 35/2020/AL regarding an overseas vietnamese’s allocation of agricultural land to a resident in vietnam before immigration overview of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent

- Situation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent:

An overseas Vietnamese has allocated her agricultural land to a resident in Vietnam before immigration; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ resident in Vietnam has been using such land plots for a stable and long term, and has been granted certificates of land use rights.

- Legal solution:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court should determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ resident in Vietnam has trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawful land use rights and reject trực tiếp bóng đá k+ claim for land use rights.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition dated May 09, 2012 and during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case process, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, Mrs. Nguyen Thi K stated:  In 1978, Mrs. Nguyen Thi K and her husband, Mr. Nguyen C, made a written document to give Mr. Nguyen Van D (their son) a land plot of 05 “sào” (or 2500 m², “sào” is a measuring unit in Vietnam, 1 “sào” = 500 m², bordering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of Mr. L, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of Mrs. Nguyen Thi E, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Montagnard (or Thượng people) and Highway 14 in its east, west, south and north respectively;  In 1982 and 1983, Mr. D sold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire land plot to Mr. Nguyen Dang N and Mr. Nguyen Van B. Then, Mrs. K gave an adjacent land plot of 150 m²to Mr. D without making any document and in 2005, gave trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house on this land plot to Mr. D (trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land given to Mr. D are determined to border trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of Mr. B in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ east, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining land of their family in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ west and south, and Highway 14 in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ north). In 2005, Mrs. K applied for  certificate of land use rights; on March 09, 2006, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City issued 02 certificates of land use rights, including: Certificate of land use rights No. AD 516166, covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 9, map sheet No. 58, area: 10,112.4m², purpose: land for annual crops; duration of use: until 2013, issued to Mrs. Nguyen Thi K; Certificate of land use rights No. AD 516165, covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 9A, map sheet No. 58, area: 300 m², purpose: urban residential land, issued to Mrs. Nguyen Thi K and Mr. Nguyen C. In November 2006, Mrs. K applied for adjustments and re-issuance of certificates of land use rights according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ actual conditions of land plots on which houses were built. On November 24, 2006, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City issued trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision No. 762/QD-UBND on revocation of Certificates of land use rights No. AD 516166 and AD 516165, and issued new Certificates of land use rights No. AG 680769 and AG 680768 to Mrs. Nguyen Thi K and Mr. Nguyen C. On June 19, 2009, Chairperson of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City issued trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision No. 1654/QD-UBND on revocation of Certificates of land use rights issued to Mrs. Nguyen Thi K and Mr. Nguyen C because they have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same areas and land plots with those specified in Certificates of land use rights issued to Mr. Nguyen Van D.

Mrs. K has brought an administrative case against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Chairperson of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City for issuance of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision No. 1654/QD-UBND on revocation of Certificates of land use rights issued to her and her husband. Mrs. K’s petition has been rejected according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court’s administrative judgment No. 02/2010/HC-ST dated June 11, 2010 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Buon Ma Thuot City; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court’s judgment has been amended and Mrs. K’s petition was accepted according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s administrative judgment No. 07/2010/HC-PT dated September 17, 2010 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak province; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Director of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Supreme Procuracy has appealed against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s administrative judgment according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Cassation Decision No. 10/2011/HC-GDT dated November 15, 2011, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ administrative court of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court has invalidated trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court’s administrative judgment No. 02/2010/HC-ST dated June 11, 2010 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Buon Ma Thuot City and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s administrative judgment No. 07/2010/HC-PT dated September 17, 2010 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak province, and transferred trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case file to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Buon Ma Thuot City for re-trying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance procedure. Upon receipt of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case file for re-trying, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Buon Ma Thuot City has directed summons to Mrs. K twice but Mrs. K did not appear at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Buon Ma Thuot City has dismissed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case.

Now, Mrs. K initiates a civil case to request Mr. and Mrs. D to return land to her with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following reasons:  In 2005, Mr. D has made a photocopy of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ photocopied document of land gifting in 1978, in which trực tiếp bóng đá k+ location of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot has been deliberately falsified, and used that photocopy in applying for certificate of land use rights. Moreover, Mr. D also made a statement of loss of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original document of land gifting which has been certified by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of E Ward. Based on documents submitted by Mr. D, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of P City has issued a certificate of land use rights to Mr. D for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area of 4,925,5m² (Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579302 covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 9A, map sheet No. 58, area: 300.5m²and Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579313 covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 09, map sheet No. 58, area: 4,624m²). Now, Mrs. K requests Mr. and Mrs. D to return an area of 4,652.7m²(having subtracted an area of 272.8m²of land appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of P City according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision No. 4233/QD-UBND dated December 24, 2010); Mrs. K agreed that Mr. and Mrs. D shall continue using trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area of 183.74m²(including 150 m²previously gifted to them and a land area of 33.74 m²additionally gifted to them because they has built a house on this land area); trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court is requested to invalidate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Certificates of land use rights issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of P City to Mr. D and Mrs. T.

- Previously, Mr. Nguyen Van D (died) and Mrs. Nguyen Thi T stated:  In 1978, Mr. C and Mrs. K made a written document to gift them a land plot of 2,500 m², bordering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of Mr. L, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of Mrs. Nguyen Thi E, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Montagnard (or Thượng people) and Highway 14 in its east, west, south and north respectively;  Mrs. K sold 500 m²of land to Mr. N in 1982 and a land area of 2,000 m²to Mr. B in 1985. Total land area sold equals to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area of 2,500 m²gifted to them in 1978. Thus, their parents agreed to give them trực tiếp bóng đá k+ adjacent land plot of 2,500 m². Then, their parents immigrated to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Federal Republic of Germany.

Before immigration to Germany, Mrs. K gave all house and land documents to Mrs. Nguyen Thi E for management. In 2004, Mrs. K returned to Vietnam. In 2005, Mr. D and Mrs. T requested Mrs. E to give back trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land documents but Mrs. E only gave them a photocopied document. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ originals of house and land documents bearing seals and certification of local authorities are kept by Mrs. K.

Mr. and Mrs. D have made a photocopy of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ photocopied document given by Mrs. E, and presented it and 2 decisions on allocation of land for planting coffee trees issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P Town in 1980 and 1990 to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of E Ward to ask for instructions on procedures for issuance of certificate of land use rights, and they were instructed to obtain trực tiếp bóng đá k+ signatures of Mrs. K and other siblings to certify their parents’ gifting of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house of 150 m²and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of 1,750 m²for planting fruit trees to them in 1978 as indicated in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original document of land gifting. Then, Mr. D told such instructions to Mrs. K (when Mr. C has died) and Mrs. K has made trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certification certifying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ gifting of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land area for planting fruit trees to them in 1978. This certification bears trực tiếp bóng đá k+ signatures of Mr. Nguyen Van D (died) and Mrs. Nguyen Thi E. Based on this certification, on December 26, 2005, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City has issued trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579302 covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 9A, map sheet No. 58, area: 300.5 m², purpose: residential land, and Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579313 covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 09, map sheet No. 58, area: 4,624.9 m², purpose: agricultural land.

However, on March 09, 2006, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City issued Certificate of land use rights No. AD 516166, covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 9, map sheet No. 58, area: 10,112.4 m², purpose: land for annual crops, to Mrs. K and Certificate of land use rights No. AD 516165, covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 9A, map sheet No. 58, area: 300 m², purpose: urban residential land, to Mrs. K and Mr. C. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land areas certified in these certificates are also trực tiếp bóng đá k+ ones specified in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificates of land use rights issued to them. After detecting this mistake, on November 24, 2006, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City issued trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision No. 762/QD-UBND to revoke trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificates of land use rights issued to Mr. C and Mrs. K.

Now, they disagreed with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition filed by Mrs. K, and also stated that they have mortgaged two land plots mentioned above to Bank A for a loan amount of VND 3,000,000,000. Because they were unable to repay debt, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank has brought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court for judgment. According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court's judgment, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment enforcement agency has sold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property via auction. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment enforcement has been finished, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court is requested to handle trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case in accordance with regulations of law.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related benefits and duties that is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City stated:  Certificates of land use rights have been issued to Mr. D and Mrs. T in accordance with regulations of law.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related benefits and duties that is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of Bank A stated:  trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgage agreement signed between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank and Mr. D and Mrs. T is bona fide, and this secured transaction has been registered in accordance with regulations of law.

- According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance civil judgment No. 124/2013/DS-ST dated September 06, 2013, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Buon Ma Thuot City, Dak Lak Province, has rejected trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire petition of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff.

- According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s civil judgment No. 07/2014/DSPT dated January 14, 2014, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province has amended trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance civil judgment and accepted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire petition of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, compelled Mr. D and Mrs. T to return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land to Mrs. K (after subtracting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area of 183.74 m²which Mrs. K has voluntarily gifted to Mr. D for building a house), and invalidate 2 certificates of land use rights issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City to Mr. D and Mrs. T.

Mr. and Mrs. D, Bank A and Mr. H (who is successful bidder for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision on recognition of agreement between persons concerned No. 47/2011/QDST-KDTM dated June 17, 2011, People’s Court of Dak Lak Province on settlement of dispute over trực tiếp bóng đá k+ credit agreement and land use rights mortgage agreement between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank and Mr. and Mrs. D) have applied for handling trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case according to cassation procedure.

- According to Decision No. 343/2014/KN-DS dated September 16, 2014, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Chief Justice of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court has appealed against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s civil judgment No. 07/2014/DSPT dated January 14, 2014 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province according to cassation procedure to invalidate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s judgment and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment, and transfer trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case file to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court for re-trying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case. According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Cassation Decision No. 461/2014/DS-GDT dated November 24, 2014, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Court of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court has invalidated trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance judgment and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s judgment, and transfer trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case file to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of Buon Ma Thuot City for re-trying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case according to first-instance procedures with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following (summarized) judgment:

+ Mr. C and Mrs. K had 29,418.27 m²of land when they were alive. In 1983, they immigrated to Germany and authorized their children, including Mr. and Mrs. D, to use trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ end of 2005, Mr. and Mrs. D were granted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of rights to use 4,924 m²of land (including 300,5m²of residential land and 4,624.9m²of agricultural land).  In 2004, Mrs. K returned to Vietnam. In 2006, Mrs. K was granted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of rights to use trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire land area which has been used by Mr. and Mrs. D according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of land use rights issued to them. Then, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee has detected this mistake and issued a decision to invalidate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificates of land use rights issued to Mrs. K and certify its lawful issuance of certificates of land use rights to Mr. and Mrs. D. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area in dispute is of Mrs. K and Mr. C but they have immigrated to a foreign country and authorized Mr. and Mrs. D to use trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area since 1983; in 2005, Mr. and Mrs. D were granted certificates of land use rights. If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ agricultural land area of 4,624.9m²was not given to Mr. and Mrs. D, it would be appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining land area is 300.5 m²of which Mrs. K has given 150 m²to Mr. D and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remainder is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance left by Mr. C, and thus, Mrs. K is not entitled to claim it.

+ On trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other hand, in 2009, Mr. and Mrs. D have mortgaged trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank for a loan. Because Mr. and Mrs. D were unable to repay debt, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank has brought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court has settled trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment enforcement agency has sold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property via auction and enforced trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court's judgment which forces Mr. and Mrs. D to return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire land area (except 180 m²of land on which Mr. D has built a house) is not legitimate and does not ensure legitimate rights and benefits of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank and of Mr. H (who is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successful bidder for land).

- According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance civil judgment No. 98/2014/DS-ST dated January 14, 2014, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Buon Ma Thuot City has decided to reject trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire petition of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff.

- According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s judgment No. 06/2016/DS-PT dated January 11, 2016, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province has decided to keep trực tiếp bóng đá k+ validity of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire first-instance judgment.

After trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate trial, Mrs. Nguyen Thi K has appealed against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s judgment No. 06/2016/DS-PT dated January 11, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cassation procedure.

- According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal No. 11/2017/KN-DS-VC2 dated February 07, 2017 through cassation procedure, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Director of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Superior People’s Procuracy of Da Nang has requested trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Committee of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Superior People’s Court conducting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cassation procedure to invalidate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance civil judgment No. 98/2014/DS-ST dated January 14, 2014 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Buon Ma Thuot City and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s judgment No. 06/2016/DS-PT dated January 11, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province for re-trying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following reasons:

+ When following procedures for certificate of land use rights, Mr. Nguyen Van D has used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ photocopied document and falsified trực tiếp bóng đá k+ document of gifting of house and land dated January 02, 1978 (changed four boundaries of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot), which includes trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certification given by Mr. Nguyen Van S, Chairman of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Farmers’ Union cum Chairman of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of E Commune, on November 25, 1983 (over 5 years after trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date of gifting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land). Thus, this certification is considered unlawful, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ issuance of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579302 covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 9A, map sheet No. 58, area: 300.5 m²,  and Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579313 covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 09, map sheet No. 58, area: 4,624.9 m²by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ household of Mr. Nguyen Van D is inappropriate.  On trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other hand, Mr. Nguyen Van S, Chairman of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Farmers’ Union cum Chairman of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of E Commune, has made certification on November 25, 1983 on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said document of gifting of house and land dated January 02, 1978 but trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court did not verified trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fact and take statements of these persons, i.e. they did not clarify trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire case.

+ trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant thought that in 1982, Mrs. Nguyen Thi K has sold 500 m²of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot that Mr. C and Mrs. K have gifted to Mr. and Mrs. D to Mr. Nguyen Dang N. In 1985, Mr. C has sold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining 2,000 m²of that land plot to Mr. Nguyen Van B. After Mr. C and Mrs. K sold land, they have gifted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ adjacent land plot of 2,500 m²to Mr. and Mrs. T.  Mr. C and Mrs. K did not provide details about four boundaries of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot which Mr. C and Mrs. K gifted to them in 1978. After this land plot has been sold, Mr. C and Mrs. K gifted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ adjacent land plot of 2,500 m²to them. Hence, they have stated that this land plot borders trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of Mr. B and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining land of their family, and asked for certification of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ state-owned cinema affiliated to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Cultural Department of Dak Lak Province and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Farmers' Union of E Commune.

However, according to land sales documents, Mr. D has directly sold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land to Mr. N and Mr. B. According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original document of land gifting presented by Mrs. K and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ photocopy thereof presented by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot in dispute has four boundaries determined but four boundaries of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot shown in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ photocopied document have been deliberately altered.  Mrs. T's statement that after selling trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot of 2,500 m² gifted to them, Mr. C and Mrs. K have gifted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ adjacent land plot of 2,500 m² to them is ungrounded because she cannot provide any evidence thereof.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant also said that Mrs. K has made a certification dated October 15, 2005 certifying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ gifting of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land plot for planting fruit trees to Mr. and Mrs. T in 1978. Mrs. K and their siblings, including Nguyen Van D (died in 2008) and Nguyen Thi E, have appended their signatures to validate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said photocopied document of land gifting. However, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provided certification only indicates that Mrs. K has gifted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house of 100m²(5m x 20m) built on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot of 150m²(5m x 30m) to Mr. and Mrs. T but trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot for planting fruit trees.

Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court procedures:  In 2005, Mr. D and Mrs. T applied for certificate of land use rights for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot which is not trực tiếp bóng đá k+ one gifted by Mr. C and Mrs. K on January 02, 1978. Mr. Nguyen C died in 1998, so Mrs. K and their 14 children are entitled to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance left by Mr. C but trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance court and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court did not consider them as persons with related benefits and duties in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit. Thus, they have violated Article 61 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2004 Civil Procedure Code (Article 73 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2015 Civil Procedure Code).

At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cassation trial, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Director of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Superior People’s Procuracy at Da Nang has requested trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Judge of Superior People’s Court at Da Nang to accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal filed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Director of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Superior People’s Procuracy at Da Nang.

[1] Regarding Mr. and Mrs. K's claim for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area of 4,924 m2 of which trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of land use rights has been issued to Mr. D and Mrs. T by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P Ward on December 26, 2005, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Committee of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Superior People’s Court at Da Nang considers that:

[2] Mr. Nguyen C and Mrs. Nguyen Thi K have a total of 14 children and Mr. Nguyen Van D is one of their children. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area of 4,924 m2 (including 300.5 m2 of residential land and 4,624.9 m2 of agricultural land) in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ dispute between Mrs. K and Mr. and Mrs. D is a portion of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot of 29,418.27 m2 established by Mr. C and Mrs. K (this land plot belongs to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ administrative division of C Commune before 1975, of H Commune after 1975, of E Commune since 1983, and presently E Ward, P City, Dak Lak Province). On October 02, 1978, Mr. C and Mrs. K made a document of house and land gifting, in which his son, Mr. Nguyen Van D, was gifted a house of 4m x 12m, located on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area of 2,500 m2, bordering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of Mr. L, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of Mrs. Nguyen Thi E, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Montagnard, and Highway 14 in its east, west, south and north respectively. However, Mr. Nguyen Dang N and Mr. Nguyen Van B have received transfer of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire land plot of 2,500 m2 in 1982 and 1983. Mrs. K stated that Mr. D has directly transferred this land plot of 2,500 m2 to Mr. N and Mr. B but Mr. D has disagreed and stated that Mr. C and Mrs. K have acted as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferor. With regard to this matter, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cassation court believed that Mr. D’s statement is legitimate because it matches with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statement provided by Mr. N and Mrs. B that they have purchased this land plot of 2,500 m2 and made payments directly to Mr. C and Mrs. K (records No. 231, 230, 229) and also matches with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fact that Mr. C and Mrs. K made a document of land gifting to Mr. D in 1978. Hence, Mr. C and Mrs. K are considered legal users of this land plot.

[3] After selling trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot of 2,500 m2, which has been gifted to Mr. D according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ document of land gifting in 1978, in 1983, Mr. C and Mrs. K have immigrated to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Federal Republic of Germany, and Mr. D and Mrs. T have managed and used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining land area. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Jury of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cassation court finds that Mr. D and Mrs. T’s statement that Mr. D’s parents have, before their immigration to Germany, gifted them trực tiếp bóng đá k+ adjacent land plot of 2,500 m2 as a substitute for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot gifted to them but his parents have sold to Mr. N and Mr. B is well-grounded because this statement matches with Mr. N and Mr. B's statement that they have purchased land and made payments directly to Mr. and Mrs. K, and also matches with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certification dated October 15, 2005 bearing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ signature of Mrs. K (which also bears trực tiếp bóng đá k+ signatures of her children, Mr. Nguyen Van D and Mrs. Nguyen Thi E, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ witness, Mr. Nguyen Van H1, and certification given by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ local authority) to certify that Mrs. K has gifted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land to Mr. D in 1978 but trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original document of land gifting has been lost, and this certification was made to facilitate Mr. D’s application for certificate of land use rights and residential house in accordance with regulations of law.

[4] On trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other hand, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot of 4,924 m2 of which Mr. D and Mrs. T have been granted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificates of land use rights by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City on December 26, 2005 has only 300.5 m2 of residential land (Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579302 covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 9A, map sheet No. 58); trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining area of 4,624.9 m2 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 09, map sheet No. 58, is agricultural land (Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579313). Pursuant to Clause 5 Article 14 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 1987 Land Law and Clause 3 Article 26 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 1993 Land Law, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ agricultural land shall be appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State if it has been not used for more than 6 months or 12 months without approval from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State. Pursuant to Clause 11 Article 38 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2003 Land Law and Point h Clause 1 Article 64 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2013 Land Law, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land used in contravention of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law shall be appropriated, including trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following cases: “trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land for annual crops which has been not used for a consecutive period of 12 months, land for perennial plants which has been not used for a consecutive period of 18 months; Forest land which has been not used for a consecutive period of 24 months; etc.”, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cassation court finds that, although Mr. C and Mrs. K previously used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ agricultural land area of 4,624.9 m2 but they have immigrated to a foreign country and have not used this land plot for many years. Thus, this agricultural land plot will be appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State; Mr. and Mrs. D have directly used this land plot, annually declared and paid land levies to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State, and have been granted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of land use rights in 2005. Thus, they have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal right to use this land plot.

[5] For trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said reasons, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cassation court thinks that it’s well-grounded to determine that: Before immigration to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Federal Republic of Germany, Mr. C and Mrs. K have gifted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot of 2,500 m2 to Mr. and Mrs. D, for which Mr. and Mrs. D have obtained a certificate of land use right, as a substitute for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same area gifted to Mr. D in 1978 and sold by Mr. C and Mrs. K to Mr. N and Mr. B in 1982 and 1983 respectively. On trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other hand, Mr. C and Mrs. K have not used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot for many years, this land plot shall be appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State. Mr. and Mrs. D have used this land plot, declared and paid land levies to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State, and have been granted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of land use rights. Hence, they have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal right to use this land plot. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance civil judgment No. 98/2014/DS-ST dated January 14, 2014 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Buon Ma Thuot City and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s judgment No. 06/2016/DS-PT dated January 11, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province rejects Mrs. K’s claim for land returned by Mr. D and Mrs. T. This judgment is well-grounded and made in accordance with regulations of law.

[6] After trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of P City had issued trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of land use right on December 26, 2005 (Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579302, covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 9A, map sheet No. 58, area: 300.5 m2, purpose: residential land, and Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579313, covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 09, map sheet No. 58, area: 4,624 m2, purpose: agricultural land), Mr. D and Mrs. T mortgaged these land plots to Bank A for a loan. Because Mr. D and Mrs. T were unable to repay debt on schedule, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank has filed a lawsuit against them. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province has solved trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision on recognition of agreement between persons concerned No. 47/2011/QDST-KDTM dated June 17, 2011, in which Mr. D and Mrs. T were compelled to repay debt to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank was entitled to liquidate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said 2 land plots if they failed to repay debt on schedule. After that, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights over trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said 02 land plots have been sold via auction for debt recovery by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Bank; Mr. H was trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successful bidder in accordance with Article 138 and Article 258 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2005 Civil Code. Thus, Mr. H is considered as a bona fide third party that has trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal right to use trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said 02 land plots and does not involve in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ dispute between Mrs. K and Mr. and Mrs. T.

[7] From trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said analysis, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Committee of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Superior People’s Court at Da Nang finds that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal No. 11/2017/KN-DS-VC2 dated February 07, 2017 through cassation procedure of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Director of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Superior People’s Procuracy at Da Nang against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s civil judgment No. 06/2016/DS-PT dated January 11, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province is ungrounded and should not be accepted, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s civil judgment No. 06/2016/DS-PT dated January 11, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province should be kept unchanged.

For trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said reasons,

“[4] On trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other hand, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot of 4,924 m2 of which Mr. D and Mrs. T have been granted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificates of land use rights by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of P City on December 26, 2005 has only 300.5 m2 of residential land (Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579302, covering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 9A, map sheet No. 58); trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining area of 4,624.9 m2 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 09, map sheet No. 58, is agricultural land (Certificate of land use rights No. AD 579313). Pursuant to Clause 5 Article 14 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 1987 Land Law and Clause 3 Article 26 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 1993 Land Law, this agricultural land plot shall be appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State if it has been not used for more than 6 months or 12 months without an approval from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State. Pursuant to Clause 11 Article 38 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2003 Land Law and Point h Clause 1 Article 64 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2013 Land Law, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land used in contravention of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Law shall be appropriated, including trực tiếp bóng đá k+ following cases: “trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land for annual crops which has been not used for a consecutive period of 12 months, land for perennial plants which has been not used for a consecutive period of 18 months; Forest land which has been not used for a consecutive period of 24 months; etc.”, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cassation court finds that, although Mr. C and Mrs. K previously used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ agricultural land area of 4,624.9 m2 but they have immigrated to a foreign country and have not used this land plot for many years. Thus, this agricultural land plot will be appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State; Mr. and Mrs. D have directly used this land plot, annually declared and paid land levies to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ State, and have been granted trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate of land use rights in 2005. Thus, they have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal right to use this land plot.
[5] ... trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first-instance civil judgment No. 98/2014/DS-ST dated January 14, 2014 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Buon Ma Thuot City and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s judgment No. 06/2016/DS-PT dated January 11, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province rejects Mrs. K’s claim for land returned by Mr. D and Mrs. T. This judgment is well-grounded and made in accordance with regulations of law.”

Pursuant to Point b Clause 1 Article 337 and se 1 Article 343 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ 2015 Civil Procedure Code; It’s judged:

1. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal No. 11/2017/KN-DS-VC2 dated February 07, 2017 through cassation procedure of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Director of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Superior People’s Procuracy at Da Nang is rejected; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s civil judgment No. 06/2016/DS-PT dated January 11, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province shall be kept unchanged;

2. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court’s civil judgment No. 06/2016/DS-PT dated January 11, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of Dak Lak Province continues to take its legal effect.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cassation decision comes into force.