xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayJudgement No. 59/2017/DS-ST dated September 26, 2017 on a loan agreement dispute

PEOPLE’S COURT OF DA NANG CITY

JUDGEMENT NO. 59/2017/DS-ST DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 ON A LOAN AGREEMENT DISPUTE

On September 26, 2017, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance trial was conducted at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay office of People’s Court of Da Nang City to hear xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case No. 10/2016/TLST-DS dated April 25, 2016 on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay loan agreement dispute according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Decision to Bring xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Case to Trial No.  11A/2017/QDXXST-DS dated April 10, 2017 between litigants:

- Petitioners:

1. Mr. Tran Trong N.

2. Mrs. Pham Ngoc L.

Both residing in: Street H, Ward T, Ho Chi Minh City.

Authorized legal representative of petitioners:Mr. Huynh Hoai N, address: Street N, Ward H, District H, Da Nang City (Letter of Authorization dated December 3, 2015).

- Respondent:

1. Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K; residing in: Street O, Ward T, District H, Da Nang City.

2. Mr. Tran Ngoc K; address: Midcrown Dr, Windcrest, Texas (TX 78239), USA.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay CASE

Representation of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners Mr. Tran Trong N and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L:

- In 2011, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondents Mr. Tran Ngoc K and Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K asked xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners Mr. Tran Trong N and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L to lend them money for business purpose; because Mr. K is Mr. N’s full older brother, Mr. N and Mrs. L agreed. Each loan would be transferred to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay account opened at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay bank and all xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay negotiation and transactions were not recorded by any document or paper.  After that, from September 7, 2011 to August 16, 2012, Mr. N and Mrs. L one after another# transferred money to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay account No. 2000206250868 opened at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Bank N in Mrs. K’s name, totaling VND 19,205,336,000.

- From October 5, 2011 to June 7, 2012, Mr. Tran Ngoc K and Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K transferred money back to them to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay account No. 1602205112771 opened at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Bank N in Mrs. L’s name, totaling VND 8,311,000,000.

- In early September 2012, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay two parties mutually agreed to charge a monthly interest of 1%on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay principal balance from early September 2012 until xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay debt is fully repaid.

- Then, because Mr. K and Mrs. K failed to repay on schedule as agreed, they continuously required them to repay a lump sum of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay debt but Mr. K and Mrs. K only promised without repaying any sum of money. Thereafter, they learned that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Mr. K and Mrs. K’s son was preparing xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paperwork to sponsor his parents to immigrate in USA. They filed a lawsuit against Mr. K and Mrs. K, requiring them to repay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay remaining debt of VND 16,680,000,000, including VND 12,000,000,000 of principal and VND 4,680,000,000 of interest.

- At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court hearing, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized legal representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners withdraws xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit as to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay following matters with below grounds: There are insubstantial grounds to prove that Mr. Tran Ngoc K was involved in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay loan with Mr. Tran Trong N and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners withdraw xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request for joint liability of Mr. K; there are also insubstantial grounds to prove that is an interest-charged loan, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners withdraw xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request for an interest of VND 4,680,000,000; it is proved that Mrs. K paid Mr. N and Mrs. L VND 8,311,000,000, so Mr. N and Mrs. L request Mrs. K to repay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay remaining principal of VND 10,894,336,000.

Representation of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K:

- From September 2011 to August 2012, she and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L provided financial help to each other to do business; however, they do not sign any document or paper. Dealing# sum all transferred via her account and Mrs. L’s account opened at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay bank; Mrs. L transferred money to her multiple times VND 12,000,000,000 in total; without interest.  After that, she repaid nearly fully this sum of money according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay vouchers certifying xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay money transfer back to Mrs. L’s account, she filed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay photos of such vouchers with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court; and she will provide xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court with accurate data later.

- Because his husband Mr. Tran Ngoc K has lived abroad, he could not appear in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court following xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay summon sent by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court. However, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay aforesaid transaction was only entered into by her and Mrs. L, Mr. K did not know about this dealing. So, she thinks that Mr. K is not involved in; and she will take responsibility to Mrs. L and repay in full xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay debt to Mrs. L.

During xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay process of settling xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent Mr. Tran Ngoc K did not provide xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court with any written response, and did not show up at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court trial.

At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing today, considering xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay compliance with procedural law by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Judge, Trial Panel, court reporter and procedural participants during xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay settlement process from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time when xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case was accepted until xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay deliberation of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Procurator determines that they have complied with laws and regulations on civil procedures and requests xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel to apply Article 466, Article 468, and Article 688 ofxoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code in Viet Nam; Article 91, Article 147 and Article 244 ofxoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code in Viet Nam; tPháp lệnh án phí, lệ phí đá bóng trực tiếp năm 2009to accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request for settlement of loan agreement dispute filed by Mr. Tran Trong N and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L against Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K.

According to documents and evidence assessed and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay adversarial process at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing, after xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Procuracy expresses xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay opinions, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel considers that:

JUDGEMENT OF xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay COURT

[1] xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners Mr. Tran Trong N and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L, Vietnamese citizens, address: Street H, Ward T, Ho Chi Minh City and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondents determined according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit petition, including Mr. Tran Ngoc K, Vietnamese nationality, address: Midcrown Dr, Windcrest, Texas (TX 78239), USA and Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K; address: Street O, Ward T, District H, Da Nang City, so xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay civil case falls under jurisdiction of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Da Nang City as prescribed in Articles 37, Article 40 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code.

[2] After xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case acceptance, on December 16, 2016, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court served xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court papers to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay overseas respondent Mr. Tran Ngoc K and required xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay competent authority of USA to take evidence abroad according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay method prescribed in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay international treaty to which xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Socialist Republic of Vietnam is a signatory in accordance with Point a Clause 1 Article 474 and Clause 1 Article 475 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code. After that, however, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court did not receive any notice of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay service of process result as well as deposition or evidence of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay overseas litigant Mr. Tran Ngoc K. On April  25 2017 when xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing was held, Mr. K also did not appear and filed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court with any request for trial in absentia, thus, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court delayed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court trial and requested xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ministry of Justice in writing to notify Mr. K of such service of process and court papers and take evidence abroad. Subsequently, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ministry of Justice issued documents No. 1735/BTP-PLQT dated May 12, 2017 and 2751/BTP-PLQT dated September 7, 2017 regarding judicial assistance performance progress and sent them to Department of Consular affiliated to Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ministry of Justice still did not receive any response. Therefore, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court decides to conduct xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing in absence of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay overseas litigant Mr. K as prescribed in Point c Clause 5 Article 477 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code.

[3] At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized legal representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners withdraws xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request for joint liability against Mr. Tran Ngoc K; upholds xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request against Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K. Considering that this is xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay decision and discretion right of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay litigant and fits for Mrs. K’s wish that she will bear xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sole responsibility to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners, not involving in Mr. K as prescribed in Article 5 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, it should be accepted.

[4] At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized legal representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners withdraws xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request for interest of VND 4,680,000,000. Considering that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners’ voluntary withdrawal of partial request conforms to Article 244 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, it is advisable to accept it to suspend xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial of such a request.

[5] In addition, at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized legal representative changes xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of principal from VND 12,000,000,000 to VND 10,894,336,000 because they can determine xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay correct amount repaid by Mrs. K to Mr. N and Mrs. L of VND 8,311,000,000, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay remaining principal is VND 10,894,336,000. Deeming that this change of request conforms to Article 244 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code and would be advantageous to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent, it should be accepted.

[6] Considering xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners’ request compelling Mrs. Ho Thi Kim to discharge xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay debt repayment liability: During xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit settlement, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioners, by original invoices and proof and documents certified by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Bank N, may prove that from September 7, 2011 to August 16, 2012Mrs. Pham Ngoc L transferred money 20 times to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay account No. 2000206250868 opened at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Bank N in Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K’s name, totaling VND 19,205,336,000; conversely, from October 5, 2011 to June 7, 2012, Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K transferred money back to Mrs. L and Mr. N 5 times to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay account No. 1602205112771 opened at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Bank N in Mrs. Pham Ngoc L’s name, totaling VND 8,311,000,000. Accordingly, Mrs. K has not repaid Mr. N and Mrs. L VND 10,894,336,000, Mr. N and Mrs. L’s request of repayment of such amount against Mrs. L conforms to Article 466 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code, it should be accepted.

[7] During xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit settlement, Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K claims that she only borrowed Mrs. Pham Ngoc L a total amount of VND 12,000,000,000 and has repaid nearly fully this amount, but she failed to provide evidence for such statement, so it cannot be accepted as prescribed in Article 91 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code.

[8] Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K has to pay first instance civil court fee determined according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount to be repaid to Mr. N and Mrs. L as prescribed in Article 147 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code and Clause 2 Article 27 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ordinance of Court Fees and Charges.

Based on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above-mentioned facts and matters,

HEREBY DECIDES

Pursuant to Article 466, Article 468 and Article 6888 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code, Article 5, Article 37, Article 40, Article 91, Article 147, Article 244, Article 474, Article 475, Article 477 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, Ordinance of court fees and charges

to accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request for settlement of loan agreement dispute filed by Mr. Tran Trong N and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L against Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K.

Judges:

1. Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K is compelled to repay Mr. Tran Trong N and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L a sum of VND 10,894,336,000 (Ten billion, eight hundred ninety four million, three hundred thirty six thousand dong).

From xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date on which xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment creditor makes a request for judgment enforcement until xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay repayment is made fully, every month, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment debtor must also incur xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay interest rate on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay late repayment according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay interest rate agreed upon by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay two parties but not exceeding xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay interest rate prescribed in Clause 1 Article 468 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code; if there is no agreement on interest rate, Clause 2 Article 468 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code shall apply.

2. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request for interest of VND 4,680,000,000 (Four billion, six hundred, eighty million dong is suspended) made by Mr. Tran Trong N and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L against Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K.

3. With reference to court fees:

Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K has to pay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance civil court fee of VND 118,894,336 (One hundred eighteen million, eighty ninety four thousand, three hundred thirty six dong).

Mr. Tran Trong N and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L do not have to pay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance civil court fee; refund Mr. N and Mrs. L VND 62,300,000 (Sixty two million, three hundred thousand dong) of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paid advance according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt No. 004970 dated December 10, 2015 of Department of Civil Judgment Enforcement of Hai Chau District, Da Nang City.

4. In case xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment or court decision is enforced as per regulations in Article 2 ofxoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on Enforcements of Civil Judgments in Viet Nam, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment creditor and judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 6, 7, 9 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on enforcement of civil judgments, and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay effective period of judgment enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on Enforcement of Civil Judgments.

5. With reference to right to appeal: xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized legal representative of petitioners Mr. Huynh Hoai Nam and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner Mr. Tran Trong N and Mrs. Pham Ngoc L have xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to appeal xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Judgment within 15 days from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date of pronouncement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Judgment; xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent Mrs. Ho Thi Kim K not present at court has xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to appeal xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Judgment within 15 days from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date on which xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Judgment is served properly in accordance with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.