trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayJudgment no. 114/2021/HS-ST dated 28/09/2021 on obtaining property by fraud

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay PEOPLE’S COURT OF CHUONG MY DISTRICT - HANOI CITY

JUDGMENT NO. 114/2021/HS-ST DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 ON OBTAINING PROPERTY BY FRAUD

On September 28, 2021, at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay head office of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Court of Chuong My district, Hanoi City, a first instance trial is conducted to hear trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay criminal case No. 117/2021/TLST-HS dated September 15, 2021 under trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Decision to bring trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case to hearing No. 133/2021/QDXXST-HS dated September 16, 2021 against trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant below:

Full name: Tran Thi T- born in 1969, Other name:  No; registered permanent residence:  D village, Q commune, Kinh Mon town, Hai Duong;

Nationality: Vietnamese; Ethnicity: Kinh; religion: No;

Education: 12/12; Occupation: Freelance worker; Position: No; Biological father: Tran Duc Dien (deceased);

Biological mother: Nguyen Thi T (deceased);

Husband: Pham Van D – born in 1966 (divorced);

Children: 2 children, older child born in 1990, younger child born in 1995;

Previous conviction, previous administrative violation: None.

Record: On December 29, 2020, was sentenced to 17 years in prison by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Court of Hai Duong province for obtaining property by fraud.

DCB No. 471 dated July 5, 2021 at Chuong My District Police.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant is serving a sentence at Hoang Tien Prison - Ministry of Public Security; has been transferred to Detention Center No. 2 - Hanoi City Police to serve trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation, prosecution and trial.  (appearing in court) - Aggrieved party: Mr. Nguyen Van Q, born in 1963; Residence: L village, LD commune, Chuong My district, Hanoi city.  (appearing in court)

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

According to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay documents available in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case file and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay progress at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay contents of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case are summarized as follows:

On April 23, 2018, Tran Thi T was granted trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Certificate of Enterprise Registration by Hai Duong Province's Department of Planning and Investment, establishing V Company Limited with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay head office at No. 20, Ward P, Hai Duong City, Hai Duong Province. Tran Thi T is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay director, but trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company is not licensed by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ministry of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs to operate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay service of sending people to work abroad.

Through trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay social network Facebook, from about July 2019, Mr. Nguyen Van Q (born in 1963; residing in L village, LD commune, Chuong My district, Hanoi) got acquainted with Tran Thi T. Until November 2019, Mr. Q knows that Tran Thi T is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Director of V Company Limited to broker and send people to work abroad in Korea.  Mr. Q asked T to do paperwork for his son, Nguyen Van Tr (born in 1987) to settle and work in Korea.  T agreed and promised that after 06 months, he would do trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay paperwork for Mr. Tr. After that, due to mutual trust and to create confidence for Mr. Q about T's ability to do trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay paperwork for Mr. Tr to go to work in Korea, T and Mr. Q and Mr. Dang Van Q1 (born in in 1964; residing in L village, LD commune, Chuong My district, Hanoi) established Hoa Quynh Lan Joint Stock Company with address at Ngoc Gia village, Chuc Son TT, Chuong My district, Hanoi, registered for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first time on December 13, 2019 with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay purpose of recruiting and training people wishing to work abroad in Chuong My district.

On December 4, 2019, at Mr. Dang Van Q1's house in L village, LD commune, at T's request, Mr. Q gave T an amount of VND 23,000,000 (Twenty-three million dong) to make a deposit for doing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay paperwork for Mr. Tr, T wrote a "Receipt of deposit contract" and receive trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay above amount in full.  About more than 10 days later, T came to see Mr. Q and his wife and offered to give T trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of VND 4,000,000 (Four million VND) to do paperwork for Mr. Tr.  Mr. Q agreed and told his wife, Ms. Ha Thi D (SN 1962) to give T trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of VND 4,000,000.  On January 12, 2020, Ms. T continued to go to Mr. Q's house to borrow an amount of VND 40,000,000 (Forty million dong) for personal spending, Mr. Q agreed and gave Ms. T trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount above. Due to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay inability to complete trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay paperwork for Mr. Q's son to work abroad, on February 8, 2020, at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Cultural House of Village L, LD Commune, Chuong My, Hanoi, Ms. T signed trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay "Paper commitment” with Mr. Q that she received from Mr. Q a total amount of VND 67,000,000 (Sixty-seven million dong); in which trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of 27,000,000 VND is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay funding to do trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay paperwork for Mr. Tr and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of 40,000,000 VND is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay loan from Mr. Q. T commits after 01 month (i.e. March 8, 2020) if Mr. Tr is not allowed to go abroad, she must refund trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay above amount to Mr. Q. For trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay above amount, T has spent all of his personal expenses.

On March 8, 2020, realizing that Ms. T neither completed paperwork for Mr. Tr to work abroad for Mr. Tr, nor paid back trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of VND 67 million, Mr. Q repeatedly contacted Ms. T to ask for money but failed, Mr. Q went to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Police Investigation Body of Chuong My District Police Department to denounce trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay fraudulent act of appropriating property by Tran Thi T and submitted trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay commitments, receipts of deposit contracts and other related documents.

On September 7, 2021, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Police Investigation Body of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Hai Duong Provincial Police Department issued a decision on prosecution of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case, a decision on prosecution of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant and a writ of arrest against Tran Thi T for temporary detention on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay charge of obtaining property by fraud as prescribed in Article 174 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code (this case occurred in Hai Duong province).

During trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation, Tran Thi T confessed:  T is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay founder of V Company Limited and Hoa Quynh Lan Joint Stock Company and has registered trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay following business line:  Supply and management of domestic and foreign labor resources and employment broker.  However, T admitted that he only used trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay name of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay director of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay two companies mentioned above to act as a mediator who receives applications and deposits of people wishing to work abroad, then transfer trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay applications to Ms. Nguyen Thi Tuyet (born in 1992; residing in Long Bien district, Hanoi) for completion and only earns 30% of commission of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay total contract value.  Since their establishment, both companies have not had any activities, no longer have a head office, have not completed dissolution procedures and still owe tax to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay State budget.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Expertise Conclusion No. 5605/C09-P5 dated September 30, 2020 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Institute of Criminal Science affiliated to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ministry of Public Security concludes:

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay signature in Tran Thi T's name under trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay section "Declared by applicant" on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay back of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay specimen A and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay signature in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay specimen M are signed by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same person.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Expertise Conclusion No. 7270/C09/-P5 dated January 29, 2021 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Institute of Criminal Science affiliated to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ministry of Public Security concludes:

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay handwriting on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay specimen A1 (except for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay handwriting under trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay items: “Representative (of authority)” and “Deliverer of money”), A2 (except for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay handwriting “Nguyen Van Tr” under trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay item “Recipient of money”); trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay signature in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay name of Tran Thi T on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay specimen A2 and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay signatures of Tran Thi T on specimen M1 and M2 are signed and written by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same person.

* Regarding civil liability: Mr. Nguyen Van Q asked Tran Thi T to refund trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of 27,000,000 VND (Twenty seven million dong) of deposit for paperwork to work abroad for Mr. Nguyen Van. Tr.  So far, T has not been able to refund Mr. Q trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay above amount.

Indictment No. 110/CT-VKS-CM dated August 26, 2021 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Procuracy of Chuong My District, charged Tran Thi T for obtaining property by fraud under Clause 1, Article 174 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code.

At trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court hearing: - Defendant Tran Thi T confessed to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay whole process of committing fraud to appropriate property as stated in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Indictment.  trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant asked trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel to consider reducing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay punishment.

- trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay representative of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Procuracy of Chuong My district affirmed prosecution against trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant and proposed trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel to declare defendant Tran Thi Tam guilty of obtaining property by fraud;

Applying Clause 1, Article 174 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code; Point s, Clause 1, Article 51; Article 56 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code, sentence Tran Thi T to 18 to 24 months in prison.  In addition to this sentence, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant was also subject to sentence combination, in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay criminal judgment No. 139/2020/HSST dated December 29, 2020 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Court of Hai Duong province.

Regarding civil liability: Tran Thi T must pay Mr. Nguyen Van Q trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of 27,000,000 VND.

Regarding additional penalties, it is recommended that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel not apply additional penalties to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendants; defendants must bear first-instance criminal court fee in accordance with law.

JUDGEMENT OF trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay COURT

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay contents of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case and documents available in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case file that have been litigated at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel shall determine as follows:

[1]. In terms of court procedures:

[1.1]. Regarding procedural decisions of investigating bodies, procedural acts of investigators and procurators:  They had properly and fully complied with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Procedure Code on:  Instituting trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case, prosecuting trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant, ratifying trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay decision on prosecution against trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant, application of preventive measures to persons held in custody or temporary detention, on investigation measures such as taking testimonies of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant, taking testimonies of witnesses, confiscating evidence, soliciting property valuation, on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay handover of procedural documents to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant and aggrieved party. During trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation process, investigators and procurators did not use forced confessions, forced interrogation, torture towards trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant.

[1.2]. Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay absence of persons with related interests and obligations; although trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay persons with related interests and obligations had been duly summoned, they did not appear in court without reason, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel, based on Clause 1, Article 292 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Procedure Code, conducted trial in their absence.

[2]. Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay content:

[2.1]. Considering that defendant Tran Thi T's testimony at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial is consistent with that of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved party, persons with related interests and obligations, witnesses, and seized exhibits.  Therefore, there are enough grounds to affirm:  During trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay period from April 2019 to December 2019, regardless of inability to send people to work abroad, Tran Thi T took advantage of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trust of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay people to give false information to Mr. Nguyen Van Q by promising to completing paperwork for Mr. Nguyen Van Tr (who is Mr. Q's son) to work in Korea. She committed to complete trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay procedure within about 6 months to appropriate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay deposit for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay application.  Putting trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trust in her, Mr. Q gave T trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of 27 million dong.  After receiving trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay money from Mr. Q, T did not comply with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay agreement but personally spent all trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay above money.

That act of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant has met all trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay elements to constitute a crime of "obtaining property by fraud" as specified at Clause 1, Article 174 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay indictment of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Procuracy of Chuong My district prosecuting defendant Tran Thi T had a legal basis, guilty person was rightly convicted.

[2.2] Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggravating and mitigating circumstances:

* Regarding aggravating circumstances:  trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant commits no aggravating circumstances.

* Regarding mitigating circumstances:  trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant “expressed cooperative attitude, showed her repentance and desire to redeem his faults”, which is a mitigating circumstance according to point s clause 1 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code.

[2.3]. Considering trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay type and level of punishment applied to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant:

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant's conduct is dangerous to society, has directly infringed on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay property rights of others, showing disregard for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay law. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay value of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay property appropriated was large and had not yet been compensated, so trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant must be imprisoned, isolated from society for a period of time for rehabilitation and education. In addition to this sentence, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant was also subject to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay sentence combination, in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay criminal judgment No. 139/2020/HSST dated December 29, 2020 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Court of Hai Duong province, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant is serving a sentence of 17 (seventeen) years in prison for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay crime of “obtaining property by fraud”, which has taken effect, combining trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay two sentences that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant must serve.

Regarding additional penalty:  trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant does not have a stable income, so trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel exempts trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant from additional monetary penalties.

[2.4] Regarding civil liability: trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved party received trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay property back and did not ask trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant for compensation, so trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel did not consider it.

Mr. Nguyen Van Q asked Tran Thi T to refund trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of 27,000,000 VND (Twenty seven million dong) of deposit for paperwork to work abroad for Mr. Nguyen Van Tr.  So far, T has not been able to refund Mr. Q trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay above amount. Therefore, it is reasonable to force defendant T to pay Mr. Q trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of VND 27,000,000.

[2.5] Regarding court fees:  Pursuant to Clause 2, Article 136 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Procedure Code 2015, Clause 1, Article 23 of Resolution No. 326/2016/UBTVQH14 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay National Assembly Standing Committee dated December 30, 2016, force trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant to pay first-instance criminal court fee and first-instance civil court fee in accordance with law. For trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay foregoing reasons:

DISPOSITION

1. Declare defendant Tran Thi T guilty of "obtaining property by fraud"

2. Pursuant to Clause 1, Article 174; Point s Clause 1 Article 51, Article 56 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code, sentence trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant Tran Thi T to 2 (two) years in prison.  Combining trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 17 years’ imprisonment in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay criminal judgment No. 139/2020/HSST dated December 29, 2020 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Court of Hai Duong province that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant is serving for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay crime of "obtaining property by fraud”. Forcing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant to serve trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay combined penalty of both sentences of 19 (nineteen) years in prison. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay prison term commences from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date of detention, September 8, 2020.

3. Applying Article 47 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayCriminal Code:

Forcing Tran Thi T to pay Mr. Nguyen Van Q trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of 27,000,000 VND (Twenty-seven million dong).

Since trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay judgment takes legal effect, Mr. Nguyen Van Q has filed a request for judgment enforcement, but if trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant does not execute, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant must continue to bear trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay interest on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay unpaid principal amount, at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay interest rate as prescribed in Article 466, Clause 2, Article 468 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Civil Code on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of late payment corresponding to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay late payment period.

4. Pursuant to Clause 2, Article 136 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayCriminal Procedure Code 2015, Clause 1, Article 23 of Resolution No.Nghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay National Assembly Standing Committee dated December 30, 2016 on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amounts of collection and exemption, reduction, collection, payment, management and use of court fees and charges: Forcing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant Tran Thi T to pay 200,000 VND for first-instance criminal court fee and 1,350,000 VND for first-instance civil court fee.

5. Pursuant to Articles 331 and 333 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 2015 Criminal Procedure Code: trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant has trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay right to appeal trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay judgment within fifteen days from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date of judgment pronouncement.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved party is entitled to appeal this judgment within 15 days from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date of pronouncement.