trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euroJudgment no. 12/2018/HNGD-ST dated march 8, 2018 on divorce

PEOPLE’S COURT OF KIEN GIANG PROVINCE

JUDGMENT NO. 12/2018/HNGD-ST DATED MARCH 8, 2018 ON DIVORCE

On March 8, 2018, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first-instance trial court was conducted at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro office of People’s Court of Kien Giang province to hear trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case No. 22/2016/TLST-HNGD dated May 23, 2016 regarding a divorce petition involving foreign elements. Pursuant to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Decision to hear trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case No. 03/2018/QDST-HNGD dated January 24, 2018 between litigants below:

- Petitioner:  Mrs. Duong Tieu L, born in: 1986. Address: 1059 LQK, AH Ward, RG City, Kien Giang Province. (Present).

- Respondent:  Mr. LE, TAM T, born in: 1974. Address: 182 Wisteria Lane Biloxi MS 39530 USA. (Absent).

trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro CASE

Representation of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro petitioner, Mrs. Duong Tieu L, in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro lawsuit complaint dated May 15, 2016 and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro representation made at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro trial:

She and Mr. LE, TAM T got to know each other through match maker; after a courtship, they decided to get married. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro couple registered their marriage at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro People’s Committee of Kien Giang Province and was issued with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro marriage certificate on June 30, 2014, included in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro marriage register No. 183, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro volume No. 01/2014 dated July 2, 2014.

While living together, they came into many conflicts. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro main reason for these conflicts is that they only had a whirlwind courtship and had dissent in viewpoint; so they did not stay in a happy marriage.

Besides, after marriage, Mr. LE, TAM T returned to USA to live, they only kept in touch via phones, and their marital bond became broken since then.  They worked hard to rebuild their marital bond to live happily together, but they obtained no result.

As for that reason, she filed for a divorce to request trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro following matters:

- With reference to marriage: She petitioned a divorce from Mr. LE, TAM T.

- With reference to common children, property and liabilities: While living together, they have no common child, property or liability so trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court is not petitioned to settle.

Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro respondent, Mr. LE, TAM T: After accepting trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case, on May 24, 2016, People's Court of Kien Giang province entrusted trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Embassy of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Socialist Republic of Vietnam in USA with judicial capacity to serve trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro notice of acceptance of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case to Mr. LE, TAM T and to take his statements according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro address provided by Mrs. L, which is  182 Wisteria Lane Biloxi MS 39530 USA in respect of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro divorce petition by Mrs. Duong Tieu L as regulated by laws; however; he did not give any opinion on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro wife’s lawsuit petition.

Thus, On May 8, 2017, People’s Court of Kien Giang Province served trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro judicial paper for trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro second time to Mr. LE, TAM T. On October 24, 2017, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Court received trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Official Dispatch No. 3183/BTP-PLQT dated October 24, 2017 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Department of International Law affiliated to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Ministry of Justice, stating trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro successful judicial service to Mr. LE, TAM T and enclosed documents.

However, in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro notice of acceptance of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case No. 39/TBTL-TA dated May 8, 2017 to be served to Mr. LE, TAM T, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Court fixed trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro time to open trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro reconciliation meeting at 14:00 on November 8, 2017; trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro time to re-open trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro reconciliation meeting at 14:00 on December 8, 2017; trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro time to open trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court hearing at 08:00 on February 8, 2018; trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro time to re-open trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court hearing at 14:00 on March 8, 2018. Location: trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro head office of People’s Court of Kien Giang Province. But Mr. LE, TAM T did not give any response to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Court and was still absent in reconciliation meetings and court hearings.

Opinions from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro representative of People’s Procuracy of Kien Giang province: People's Court of Kien Giang province has full jurisdiction over trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case in which trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro party concerned – trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro respondent is a foreigner as authorized. During trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro settlement of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case and at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro trial, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro judge, jury, court reporter and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro petitioner has conformed to provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Civil Procedure Code.

As Mr. LE, TAM T did not give any response and was still absent in reconciliation meetings and court hearings although trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Court duly served trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court papers to him, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Trial Panel conducted trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro trial in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro absence of Mr. LE, TAM T in accordance with laws and regulations.

In respect of Mrs. L’s lawsuit petition:  As trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro couple has lost contact with each other for a long time, and failed to live a married life together, they are no longer being in love with each other. Hence, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Trial Panel is requested to accept trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro divorce petition of Mrs. L. No claim for common children and property was made, so trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Court will not consider it further.

JUDGEMENT OF trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro COURT

[1] In terms of court procedures: trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro defendant, Mr. LE, TAM T, under judicial assistance entrusted by People's Court of Kien Giang province to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Embassy of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Socialist Republic of Vietnam in USA to serve trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro notice of acceptance of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case to Mr. LE, TAM T and to take his statements as prescribed in Article 11 and 13 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euroLaw on Judicial Assistance in Viet Namand trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Convention on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters passed on November 15, 1965 and coming into force from February 10, 1969. On November 3, 2017, People’s Court of Kien Giang Province received trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Official Dispatch No. 3183/BTP-PLQT dated October 24, 2017 and enclosed documents of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Department of International Cooperation affiliated to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Ministry of Justice stating trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro successful service to Mr. LE, TAM T as requested by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Court, but Mr. LE, TAM T did not give any statement and was still absent in reconciliation meetings and court hearings. As for that reason, pursuant to Clause 1 Article 16 ofJoint Circular No. 12/2016/TTLT-BTP-BNG-TANDTC in Viet Namdated October 19, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Supreme People’s Court, Point a Clause 5 Article 477 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euroCivil Procedure Code in Viet Namto hear trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro case in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro absence of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro respondent, Mr. LE, TAM T.

[2] With reference to conjugal relationship: Mrs. Duong Tieu L and Mr. LE, TAM T knew each other, lived together, registered marriage and were granted trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro marriage certificate dated on June 30, 2014, recorded in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro marriage register No. 183, volume 01, 2014 dated July 2, 2014 in accordance with Article 9, Article 10 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euroLuật vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay nhân vàand Article 8, Article 9 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay eurotrực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Hôn nhân và gia đình, so it is a duly legitimate marriage. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro purpose of marriage is to build a comfortable, prosperous, civilized and happy family. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro spouse has duties to live, love, take care and support each other. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro couple, however, stayed in a broken marriage that they lived apart and did not meet with each other so their spousal relationship cannot be maintained. They have lost touch with each other since  2016 and have no feeling for each other, so they cannot build a happy family.

Deeming that their purpose of marriage is not achieved and their marriage cannot last longer, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Trial Panel has valid grounds to accept trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro divorce petition and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro request of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro designated representative of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro People’s Procuracy of Kien Giang Province and allow trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro petitioner to lawfully divorce trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro respondent as prescribed in Article 56 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Law on Marriage and Family 2014.

[3] With reference to common children: trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro couple has no common child during trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro time living together so trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court is not requested to settle.

[4] With reference to common property and liabilities: No common property and liability is claimed so trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court is not requested to settle.

[5] With reference to court fee: trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court fee shall be paid under provisions in Clause 4 Article 147 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Civil Procedure Code, Article 48 of Resolution No.326/2016/UBTVQH14 dated December 30, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro National Assembly on amount, remission, collection, payment, management and use of court costs and fees, Clause 8 Article 27 and Clause 1 Section I regarding trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro List of court costs and fees issued together with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euroPháp lệnh án phí, lệ phí đá bóng trực tiếpdated February 27, 2009 on court costs and fees.

Mrs. Duong Tieu L has to pay trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first-instance civil court fee of VND 200,000, which shall be deducted from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro advance of first-instance court fee.

[6] Other proceeding costs: Judicial assistance fees including VND 150,000 according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro receipt No. 0012501 dated May 25, 2016; VND 150,000 according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro receipt No. 0012728 dated May 9, 2017 of Civil judgment Enforcement Agency of Kien Giang Province; USD 95 transferred to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro account of ABC legal Services company and related fees paid to Vietcombank – Kien Giang branch.

Mrs. Tran Thi M has made full payment as prescribed in Clause 3 Article 153 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Civil Procedure Code.

Pursuant to documents and evidence mentioned above:

HEREBY DECIDES

Pursuant to Clause 3, Article 153, Point d Clause 1 Article 469, Point a Clause 5 Article 477, Clause 2 Article 479 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Civil Procedure Code; Clause 1 Article 56 of Marriage and Family Law 2014; Clause 4 Article 147 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Civil Procedure Code; Article 48 ofNghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quy định về mứcdated December 30, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Standing Committee of National Assembly on amount, remission, collection, payment, management and use of court costs and fees; Clause 8 Article 27, Clause 1 item about trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro list of court costs and fees issued together with Ordinance No.10/2009/UBTVQH12 dated February 27, 2009 providing for court costs and fees; Clause 1 Article 16 of Joint Circular No. 12/2016/TTLT-BTP-BNG-TANDTC dated October 19, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Supreme People’s Court which provides guidelines for application of a number of provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Law on Legal Assistance regarding legal assistance in civil cases.

- Hereby judges:

Accept trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro lawsuit petition of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro petitioner, Mrs. Duong Tieu L.

1. With reference to conjugal relationship: Mrs. Duong Tieu L is granted divorce from Mr. LE, TAM T.

2. With reference to common children: trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro couple has no common child during trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro time living together so trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court is not requested to settle.

3. With reference to common property and liabilities: No common property and liability is claimed so trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court is not requested to settle.

4. With reference to court fees: Mrs. Duong Tieu L has to pay trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first-instance civil court cost of VND 200,000, which shall be deducted from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro first-instance court cost paid in advance according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro court cost and fee payment receipt No.0004937 dated May 19, 2016 issued by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Department of Civil Judgment Enforcement of Kien Giang province.   Mrs. L is not required to pay extra court fee.

5. Other proceeding costs: Judicial assistance fees including VND 150,000 according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro receipt No. 0012501 dated May 25, 2016; VND 150,000 according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro receipt No. 0012728 dated May 9, 2017 of Civil judgment Enforcement Agency of Kien Giang Province; USD 95 transferred to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro account of ABC legal Services company and related fees paid to Vietcombank – Kien Giang branch. Mrs. Duong Tieu L has made full payment.

6. Right to appeal: Mrs. Duong Tieu L is entitled to submit a written appeal within 15 (fifteenth) days from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro day on which trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro judgment is pronounced (May 18, 2018) to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro superior People's Court in order to request an appeals court.

Mr. LE, TAM T may rightfully appeal trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro judgment within 1 month from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro day on which this judgment is served or publicly notified as per law provisions.

7. In case trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro judgment or court decision is enforced as per regulations in Article 2 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euroLuật thi đá bóng trực tiếp dân sự 2008 Số hiệu 26/2008/QH12, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro judgment creditor and judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 6, 7, 7a and 9 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Law on enforcement of civil judgments, and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro effective period of judgment enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Law on enforcement of civil judgments./.