Judgment no. 130/2022/DS-PT on Dispute over house reclaim, distribution of inheritance, division of common property, cancellation of declaration of acceptance of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legacy

SUPERIOR PEOPLE’S COURT IN HO CHI MINH CITY

JUDGMENT NO. 130/2022/DS-PT DATED MARCH 15, 2022 ON DISPUTE OVER HOUSE RECLAIM, DISTRIBUTION OF INHERITANCE, DIVISION OF COMMON PROPERTY, CANCELLATION OF DECLARATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay LEGACY

On March 8 and 15, 2022, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Superior People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City conducted a public appellate trial of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case No. 622/2020/TLPT-DS dated December 14, 2020 on "Dispute over house reclaim, distribution of inheritance, division of common property, cancellation of declaration of acceptance of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legacy”.

As xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance civil judgment No.Bản án vềdated July 13, 2020 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City was appealed.

According to Decision to bring xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case to appellate trial No. 157/2022/QD-PT dated February 16, 2022 between:

- Petitioner:Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N, born in 1938.

Address: H St, C West NSW 2166.

Legal representative authorized by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner:

1/. Ms. Vo Thi Kim Th, born in 1984.

Address: H Street, Ward 15, District T, Ho Chi Minh City.

Authorized representative of Ms. Vo Thi Kim Th:  Mr. Le Dai Th, born in 1988. Address: Q Street, Ward 11, District G, Ho Chi Minh City. (appeared in court)

2/. Mr. Thuong Hoang Ph, born in 1978. (did not appear in court) Address: B Street, Ward 9, District 10, Ho Chi Minh City.

- Respondent:Ms. Le Thi Kim L, born in 1961. (appeared in court) Address: 664 X Street, Group 1, Quarter 1, Ward P, District 9 (now Th city), Ho Chi Minh City.

Authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent:  Mr. Le Xuan H Address: U Street, Quarter 2, Ward T, District Th (now Th City), Ho Chi Minh City. (appeared in court) Defender of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent's legitimate rights and interests: Lawyer Hoang Thai L - Ho Chi Minh City Bar Association.  (appeared in court)

- Persons with interests and obligations related to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case:

1/. Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, born in 1968. (did not appear in court)

2/. Ms. Tran Le Vuong Tr, born in 1983. (did not appear in court)

3/. Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, born in 1957. (did not appear in court)

4/. Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, born in 1968. (did not appear in court)

5/. Nguyen Thi Ngoc A, born in 2003.

Guardian: Ms.  Le Thi Thuy Tr, born in 1968.

Co-address: 668 X Street, Group 1, Quarter 1, Ward P, District 9 (now Th city), Ho Chi Minh City.

6/. Ms. Le Thi H (died in 2018)xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay successor of Ms. H's procedural rights and obligations:

6.1/. Ms.  Nguyen Thi Th, died in 2014.

6.2/. Ms. Le Thi Kim L, born in 1961. (appeared in court) Address: 664 X Street, Group 1, Quarter 1, Ward P, District 9 (now Th city), Ho Chi Minh City.

6.3/. Ms. Le Thi Kim V, born in 1959. (did not appear in court) Address:  672 X Street, Ward P, District 9 (now Th city), Ho Chi Minh City.

6.4/. Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, born in 1968. (did not appear in court)

6.5/. Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, born in 1968. (did not appear in court)

6.6/. Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, born in 1957. (did not appear in court) Co-address: 668 X Street, Group 1, Quarter 1, Ward P, District 9 (now Th city), Ho Chi Minh City.

6.7/. Mr. Le Van D, born in 1965.

Mr. D’s authorized representative: Ms. Le Thi Kim L, born in 1961. Address: 664 X Street, Group 1, Quarter 1, Ward P, District 9 (now Th city), Ho Chi Minh City. (appeared in court) xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Ms. Tran Le Vuong Tr, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Nguyen Thi Ngoc A: Ms. Le Thi Kim V, born in 1959, Address: 672 X Street, Ward P, District 9 (now Th city), Ho Chi Minh City. (did not appear in court)

7/. Public notary office No. 10 (with written request for trial in absentia).

Address: L Street, Ward 2, District 10, Ho Chi Minh City.

- Appellant:Mr. Thuong Hoang Ph (authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner), xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent Ms. Le Thi Kim L (also xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of Mr. Le Van D), person with relevant interests and obligations: Ms. Le Thi Kim V (also xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L).

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner, Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N, with an authorized representative, presented:

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 668 on X Street, Ward P, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City was originally owned by Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N (Mr. N) and his wife, Ms.  Nguyen Thi Th.  Mr. N and Ms.  Th had cohabited before 1986 and they were confirmed by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Committee of Ward P as a de facto relationship on February 18, 2014.

In 2014, Ms. Nguyen Thi Th died; after going out of mourning for Ms. Th, he returned to Australia. In Vietnam, Ms. Le Thi H (Ms. Th's mother), Le Thi Kim L (Ms. Th's sister) arbitrarily broke xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay door lock and brought people to live at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 668 on Street X without Mr. N's consent. After returning home, he repeatedly made notices to reclaim xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house, but Ms. H and Ms. L still deliberately occupied this property and did not intend to return it to Mr. N.

In 2014, he sued to ask Ms. Le Thi H and Ms. Le Thi Kim L to return xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house to him.

In 2016, Ms. Le Thi H passed away.

In 2019, Mr. N redefined xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit against Ms. Le Thi Kim L according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay following content:  Request for division of marital property which is house No. 668 on Street X, Ward P, District 9 (now Th city), Ho Chi Minh City; it has been currently occupied by Ms. Le Thi Kim L and require an inheritance for Ms. Th's share in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house.  On June 1, 2020, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner has a petition to withdraw xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house reclaim.

At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance court hearing, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's representative redefined xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay claim, in specific: xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay claim for division of common property which is a half of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 668 on Street X, Ward P, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City and division of inheritance by operation of law for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay remaining half of Ms. Th's house because Ms. Th died in 2014. Request to cancel xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay declaration of acceptance of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legacy made by Ms. Le Thi H at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay District 10 Public Notary Office on June 19, 2017.

Respondent, Ms. Le Thi Kim L, presented:

Mr. N's claim that he and Ms. Th had a husband and wife relationship before 1975 was not true, Ms. L's family only knew Mr. N because he has a workshop near their house, and Mr. N had left xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay country for a long time. Later, he sometimes went back and forth Vietnam and came to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 668 on Street X, Ward P, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City many times as friends.  In 2014, Ms. Th died, Mr. N attended xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay funeral and went into mourning.

Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N sued that she arbitrarily unlocked xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house to live in and still deliberately did not return xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house to Mr. N. It was not true because she has her own house and currently resides at 664 Duong X, Ward P, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City.  xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 668 belonged to her sister named Nguyen Thi Th; in 2014, Ms. Th died without a husband and children, leaving no will, so xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house located at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above address is automatically inherited by Ms. Th’s mother, who is Ms. Le Thi H.  Mr. N's lawsuit was groundless, so she asked xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City to suspend xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case.

Persons with interests and obligations related to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case:

Mr. Le Van D authorized Ms. Le Thi Kim L to represent: Agreed with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent's opinion.

Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Ms. Tran Le Vuong Tr, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Nguyen Thi Ngoc A together authorized Ms. Le Thi Kim V to represent: Agreed with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent's opinion.

Public Notary Office No. 10: had been duly summoned many times by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance court but still did not appear in court during xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case settlement process.

In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First instance civil judgment No. 972/2020/DS-ST dated July 13, 2020, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City judges:

Pursuant to Articles 234, 651, 660 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code 2015; pursuant to Clause 2, Article 59 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on Marriage and Family 2014; Resolution 35/2000/NQ-QH10 dated June 9, 2000 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly;

Joint Circular 01/2001/TTLT-TANDTC-VKSNDTC-BTP dated January 3, 2001;

Resolution No. 326/2016/UBTVQH14 dated December 30, 2016 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly Standing Committee, stipulating xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court fees and charges, collection, exemption, reduction, management, and use thereof;

Declare:

1/. Suspend house reclaim of Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N.

2/. Determine xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay relationship between Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N and Ms. Nguyen Thi Th as a de facto relationship.

3/. Refuse Nguyen Tony Van N's request for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay division of common property, which is xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 668 on Street X, Ward P, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City.

4/. Accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request to divide xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay inheritance of Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N:

Identify xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay real estate No. 688 on Street X, Ward P, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City as xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate left by Ms. Nguyen Thi Th (xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and land according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay existing condition map of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay location provided by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Center of Cartography affiliated to Department of Natural resources and environment (made on September 24, 2018).

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first line of succession of Ms. Nguyen Thi Th includes Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N and Ms. Le Thi H (died in 2018). xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first line of succession of Ms. H includes Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Ms. Le Thi Kim L, Mr. Le Van D, Ms. Le Thi Kim V.

Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N and Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Ms. Le Thi Kim L, Mr. Le Van D, Ms. Le Thi Kim V each receives a half of value of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 688 on Street X, Ward P, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time of writ of execution.

5/. Cancel xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay declaration of acceptance of legacy of Ms. Le Thi H made at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay District 10 Public Notary Office on June 19, 2017.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay parties shall request xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay competent Department of Civil Judgment Enforcement to enforce xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment.  In case xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment debtor is late in fulfilling xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay payment obligation, he/she must pay additional interest on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of late payment corresponding to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay late payment period as prescribed in Articles 357 and 468 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code 2015.

In addition, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment also declared court fees, liability for judgment enforcement and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to appeal according to regulations.

On July 27, 2020, Ms. Le Thi Kim L and Le Thi Kim V filed an appeal against xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay entire first-instance judgment.

On August 6, 2020, Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N filed an appeal against a part of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment, proposing to amend xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment towards accepting xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's request for division of common property.

At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court hearing, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N, Ms. Le Thi Kim L (also xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of Ms. Le Thi Kim V) presented that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal request remained unchanged.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N presented: Documents and evidences contained in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file showed that Mr. N and Ms. Nguyen Thi T had cohabited; had a de facto relationship, in accordance with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of law. From xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay day he lived with Ms. Th, he followed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law of monogamy.  Regarding xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land use right, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner confirmed that it was originally given by Ms. Th's mother before her marriage. Therefore, when Ms. Th died, Mr. N proposed to be divided a half of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay value of Ms. Th's estate left to 02 people in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first line of succession, Mr. N and Ms. H. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house which was built during marriage should be xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay marital property. Mr. N offered to receive a half of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay value of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house. Mr. N was eligible to have real estate ownership in Vietnam registered in his name, so he offered to receive xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in kind and reimburse xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay remaining value to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent presented:  xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's claim that Ms. Th has been economically dependent on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner was incorrect because Ms. H's family and Ms. Th's family are fairly well off.  Ms. Th was just an intermediary to help Mr. N transfer money from abroad to relatives in Vietnam; Mr. N did not transfer money to Ms. Th. Mr. N took care of Ms. Th when she was sick, and went into mourning for Ms. Th just to show gratitude towards Ms. Th for her help; that was not considered as cohabitation and taking care of as husband and wife. Mr. N and Ms. Th were not a de facto relationship.  Before 1978, Mr. N had a wife and children; in 1979, Mr. N crossed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border with his wife and children. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent provided 5 written confirmations from people living near Mr. N's house in Vietnam that at that time Mr. N had a wife and children in Vietnam. Therefore, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent proposed not to recognize xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay de facto relationship between Mr. N and Ms. Th; denied xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's claim on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay division of common property and inheritance as to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 668, Street X.

Viewpoint of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Superior People's Procuracy on lawsuit settlement:

- Regarding legal proceedings: xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate trial panel and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay involved parties strictly have complied with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code.

- With reference to content: xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance trial was rendered well-grounded and lawful.  Propose xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel not to accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent's appeal proposing dismissal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's petition. Regarding xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's representative, during xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate trial, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner could provide new documents to prove that he had sent money to Ms. Th, so propose xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel to accept a part of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner’s appeal, amend xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment towards considering and settling xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay money Mr. N sent to build a house.

Based on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay evidence and documents verified at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial; xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay results of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay oral argument at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay basis of fully and comprehensively examining evidence and opinions of litigants and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay procurator,

JUDGEMENT OF xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay COURT

[1] In terms of court procedures: xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of Mr. Thuong Hoang Ph (authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner), xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent Ms. Le Thi Kim L (also xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of Mr. Le Van D), person with relevant interests and obligations: Ms. Le Thi Kim V (also xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L) was made within xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay statutory and valid time limit, so it should be considered by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate procedure.

[2]. Regarding xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content:

[2.1] xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner, Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N, sued for division of marital property, division of inheritance by operation of law with respect to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay portion of property left by Ms. Nguyen Thi Th as to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and land No. 688 on Street X, ward P, District 9 (now Th city), Ho Chi Minh City on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay grounds that Mr. N and Ms. Th had a de facto relationship, and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and land are xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay common property of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay couple during their marriage.

Respondent Ms. Le Thi Kim L did not agree with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's petition on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay grounds that Mr. N and Ms. Th had no marital relationship, and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay disputed property was legally owned by Ms. Th; and Ms. H (Ms. Th's mother) was xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay only heir of Ms. Th.

[2.2] Based on documents and evidence in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel considered:

[2.2.1] Regarding xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay marital relationship between Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N and Ms. Nguyen Thi Th:

Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N and Ms. Nguyen Thi Th had cohabited as husband and wife since before 1987, confirmed by families living next to Ms. Th's house, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay head of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay neighborhood where Ms. Th lived. Mr. N permanently resided in a foreign country but often returned to Vietnam. When he returned, he resided at Ms. Th's house, with a residence period of about 3 months each time. In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay declarations of temporary residence registration of Ms. Th for Mr. N during his trips to Vietnam to stay at home with Ms. Th, Ms. Th all recorded her relationship with Mr. N as "Husband". Since 1982, Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N had sent money from abroad to Ms. Th many times, as evidenced by many deposit slips from 1982 to 1994 provided by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner. In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay certificate of Ms. Le Thi H (Ms. Th's mother), from 1983, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay logbook of money and goods received from abroad recorded Mr. Tony Van N as "grandchild", in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay section of relatives. Mr. N himself currently keeps xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay original records of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and land No. 668, Street X, which was xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house where Ms. Th lived, proving that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay two parties have a de facto relationship and they managed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay property together. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent, Ms. Le Thi Kim L, also admitted that Mr. N visited and took care of Ms. Th when Ms. Th was ill, took care of her funeral, and went into mourning when Ms. Th died.

During xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate trial, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner provided a certificate of celibacy at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay place of residence of New South Wales, consularly legalized, identified according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay archives from October 19, 1979 to May 18, 2014, there was no information on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay marriage registration of Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent provided a commitment letter from people who lived near Mr. N's house in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay 1960s, identifying that Mr. N had a wife named Lac and 04 children to prove that Mr. N had had a previous marriage relationship. Considering that, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay commitment did not clearly determine xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay identities of those who are said to be xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay wife and children of Mr. N or exact duration of their marriage.  This was not one of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legal grounds to prove that Mr. N had another legal marital relationship.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance court, based on Point a, Clause 3, Resolution 35/2000/NQ-QH10 dated June 9, 2000 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly, confirmed that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay relationship between Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N and Ms. Nguyen Thi Th was a de facto relationship. That was well-grounded and accordant with law.

[2.2.2] Considering xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's request for division of common property and inheritance by operation of law:

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay origin of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land use right at house No. 668, Street X was from Ms. Le Thi H (Ms. Th's mother) as a gift to Ms. Nguyen Thi Th. In 1990, Ms. Th built a house on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land. While cohabiting with Mr. N, Ms. Th did not commingle xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay separate property with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay common property of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay husband and wife. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner argued that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land use right and house ownership right at 668 X Street were created during xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay marriage, with money sent by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner from abroad, so they are marital property. At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner determined that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land use right was gifted by Ms. Th's mother to Ms. Th, so Mr. N only asked for a half of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land use right. Regarding xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay source of money to build xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house, Mr. N as well as his authorized representative could not provide any direct evidence to confirm that Mr. N transferred money from abroad to Ms. Th, for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purpose of building xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house. Therefore, there was no basis to determine that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay disputed land and house were xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay common property of Mr. N and Ms. Th during their marriage period.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay land use right and house ownership at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 688 on Street X were xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legal property of Ms. Nguyen Thi Th. In 2014, Ms. Th died without leaving a will. Th's line of succession at that time included Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N as her husband and Ms. Le Thi H as her mother. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance court divided Mr. N and Ms. H each to receive a half of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate left by Ms. Th; in which xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first line of succession of Ms. Le Thi H (died in 2018), including Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Ms. Le Thi Kim L, Mr. Le Van D, Ms. Le Thi Kim V. H, would receive xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legacy of Ms. H. That division was well-grounded and accordant with law.

[2.2.3] Considering xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of Ms. Le Thi Kim L and Ms. Le Thi Kim V proposing to reverse xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment due to a violation of procedural procedures, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel found that: xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent, Mr. Dang Tran Tr, participated in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance trial on June 29, 2020, as shown in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Minutes of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance civil trial on June 29, 2020 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay fact that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment did not show Mr. Tr's presence and did not mention Mr. Tr's presentation was erroneous; however, Mr. Tr's presentation was consistent with Ms. Le Thi Kim L's presentation and request and was fully recorded in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court minutes, so that error of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment did not affect xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay rights of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent as well as xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay objective settlement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent's request to reverse xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment for a re-trial based on above-mentioned ground could not be accepted.

[2.2.4] From xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above analysis, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel considered that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance court's settlement was grounded and accordant with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law, so there was no ground to accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellants and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance judgment should be affirmed.

[3] Other decision portions of first instance judgment having no appeal or protest take legal effect after xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay expiry of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time limit for appeal or protest.

[4] Because xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal was not accepted, Le Thi Thuy Tr, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Ms. Le Thi Kim L, Mr. Le Van D had to bear xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate civil court fee.

Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, Ms. Le Thi Kim V are elderly, so they are exempted from appellate civil court fees.

For xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foregoing reasons;

DISPOSITION

Pursuant to Article 1 and Article 308 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayCriminal Procedure Code 2015;

Refuse xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of Mr. Thuong Hoang Ph (authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner), xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent Ms. Le Thi Kim L (also xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of Mr. Le Van D), person with relevant interests and obligations: Ms. Le Thi Kim V (also xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L).

Affirm xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance civil judgment No. 972/2020/DS-ST dated July 13, 2020 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City.

Pursuant to Articles 234, 651, 660 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm naytrực tiếp bóng đá; Clause 2, Article 59 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayxem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube; ResolutionNghị quyết 35/2000/NQ-QH10dated June 9, 2000 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly; Joint CircularThông tư liên tịch 01/2001/TTLT-TANDTC-VKSNDTC-BTPdated 03/01/2001; Resolution No.Nghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14dated December 30, 2016 stipulating xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay rates of collection, exemption, reduction, collection, payment, management and use of court fees and charges of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly Standing Committee.

Declare:

1/. Suspend xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house reclaim of Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N.

2/. Determine xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay relationship between Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N and Ms. Nguyen Thi Th as xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay de facto relationship.

3/. Refuse Nguyen Tony Van N's request for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay division of common property, which is xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 668 on Street X, Ward P, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City.

4/. Accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request to divide xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay inheritance of Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N:

Identify xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay real estate No. 688 on Street X, Ward P, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City as xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay estate left by Ms. Nguyen Thi Th (xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and land according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay existing condition map of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay location provided by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Center of Cartography affiliated to Department of Natural resources and environment (made on September 24, 2018).

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first line of succession of Ms. Nguyen Thi Th includes Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N and Ms. Le Thi H (died in 2018). xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first line of succession of Ms. H includes Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Ms. Le Thi Kim L, Mr. Le Van D, Ms. Le Thi Kim V.

Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N and Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Ms. Le Thi Kim L, Mr. Le Van D, Ms. Le Thi Kim V each received a half of value of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 688 on Street X, Ward P, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time of writ of execution.

5/. Cancel xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay declaration of acceptance of legacy of Ms. Le Thi H made at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay District 10 Public Notary Office on June 19, 2017.

6/. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay parties shall request xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay competent Department of Civil Judgment Enforcement to enforce xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment.  In case xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment debtor is late in fulfilling xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay payment obligation, he/she must pay additional interest on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of late payment corresponding to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay late payment period as prescribed in Articles 357 and 468 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code 2015.

7/. Other decision portions of first instance judgment having no appeal or protest take legal effect after xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay expiry of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time limit for appeal or protest.

8/. Regarding appellate civil fee:

Ms. Le Thi Thuy Tr, Ms. Le Thi Thuy L, Ms. Le Thi Kim L, Mr. Le Van D, each must bear 300,000 VND; which is deducted from 300,000 VND paid in advance for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court fee according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipts No. 0092227, 0092228, 0092229, 0092230 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay same day on August 5, 2020 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Judgment Enforcement Department of Ho Chi Minh City; they paid xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court fees in full.

Mr. Nguyen Tony Van N, Mr. Nguyen Thanh L, Ms. Le Thi Kim V are exempted from appellate civil court fees.

9/. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate judgment takes legal effect from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date of pronouncement.

10/. In case xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court verdict or decision is enforced as per regulations in Article 2 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayLuật thi đá bóng trực tiếp dân sự 2008, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment creditor and judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 6, 7 and 9 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on enforcement of civil judgments, and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay effective period of judgment enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on enforcement of civil judgments