trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nayJudgment no. 134/2017/HSST dated october 24, 2017 on theft of property

trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay PEOPLE’S COURT OF HAI PHONG CITY

JUDGMENT NO. 134/2017/HSST DATED OCTOBER 24, 2017 ON THEFT OF PROPERTY

On October 24, 2017, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance public trial was conducted at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay courtroom of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay People's Court of Hai Phong City to hear trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay handled first-instance criminal case No. 137/2017/HSST dated October 03, 2017 against trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay following defendant:

Nguyen Van T,born in 1995 in Hai Phong City; Residence: A hamlet, B commune, C district, Hai Phong City; occupation:  Worker; Educational level:  12/12; Father: Mr. Nguyen Van N, born in 1971; Mother: Mrs. Le Thi Y, born in 1971; no wife, no child; Criminal records and previous convictions:  None; Currently, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant is subject to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay following preventive measure: Residential confinement; present at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay trial.

Civil plaintiff:

F Co., Ltd.; headquarters:  No. 1, Road No. 9, VSIP Hai Phong Township, Industrial & Service Park, D commune, C district, Hai Phong City.

Legal representative:  Mr. M Kiyosawa, born in 1962; position:  General Director; absent from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay trial.

Interpreter:  Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ha G, born in 1993; position:  Assistant to General Director; absent from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay trial.

CONTENTS OF trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay CASE

trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant Nguyen Van T is prosecuted by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay People’s Procuracy of Hai Phong City for trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay following crime:

Nguyen Van T is a worker of F Co., Ltd. or F company for short (a wholly foreign-owned enterprise), headquarters located at No. 1, Road No. 9, VSIP Hai Phong Township, Industrial & Service Park, D commune, C district, Hai Phong City. On July 03, 2017, Nguyen Van T worked trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay night shift.  About 02:00 AM, on July 04, 2017, T went to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay temporary warehouse space at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay company’s parking area and found some cardboard boxes containing components which are trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay company’s products at C6 block, and then he worked out a plan to steal such products.   T took a cardboard box and brought it to a place near to his working place. Then, he opened trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay box with a paper-knife and found that there were 50 printer hardware pieces of 320 GB type in trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay box.  T put all hardware pieces found into his backpack and threw trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay empty box away to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay cardboard box area.  About 06:00 AM on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay same day when his work shift ended, T concealed his backpack in trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay employee locker at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay company, and he took and put 06 hardware pieces inside his trouser pockets for bringing them home.   On July 04, 2017, when T came trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay company to work trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay night shift, he took a black backpack with him and put it in his employee locker.  About 06:00 AM on July 05, 2017 when his work shift ended, T took 16 hardware pieces into his backpack, concealed 06 hardware pieces inside 02 trouser back pockets and 07 others inside 02 trouser front pockets, and then he left trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay company through trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay gate No. 2. Because T showed abnormal behaviors, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay company’s guard requested him for physical examination. T threw 07 hardware pieces that he concealed inside his trouser front pockets into trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay garbage bin near trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay guard room.  trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay company’s guard coordinated with officers of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay police station of VSIP Industrial Park in carrying out trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay physical examination, and then detected and collected 29 hardware pieces. 15 other hardware pieces that T concealed in his employee locker were also collected.  By search of residence of Nguyen Van T, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay investigation authority affiliated to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Police Office of C district confiscated 06 hardware pieces that T brought from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay company to home on July 04, 2017.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay property valuation report made on July 10, 2017, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay valuation panel specializing in criminal procedures of C district concluded that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay value of 50 (fifty) printer hardware pieces is VND 37,059,950 (thirty seven million, zero hundred fifty nine thousand, nine hundred fifty dongs).

According to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Indictment No. 132/CT-P3 dated October 02, 2017, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay People’s Procuracy of Hai Phong City prosecuted Nguyen Van T for trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay “Theft of property” crime in accordance with Clause 1 Article 138 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Criminal Code.

At trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay procurator still keeps his/her decision to prosecute trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant unchanged as specified in trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay above-mentioned Indictment, and also requests trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Trial panel to impose a suspended imprisonment sentence of 12 – 18 months on Nguyen Van T and determine trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay probation period according to Clause 1 Article 138, Points g, h, p Clause 1, Clause 2 Article 46, Article 60 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Criminal Code.

Regarding civil compensation and handling of exhibits:  trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Trial panel is requested to return 50 printer hardware pieces to F Co., Ltd.

Based on evidences and documents investigated at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay trial,  Based on results of oral arguments at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay trial achieved on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay basis of full and thorough examination of evidences and standpoints of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay procurator, statements of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant and other procedural documents,

JUDGMENTS OF trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay TRIAL PANEL

At trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant Nguyen Van T has expressed his cooperative attitude and admitted his crime. His statements at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay trial are conformable with his statements provided at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay investigation authority, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay statements of witnesses and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay civil plaintiff, seized exhibits, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Record of crime in flagrante made by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay police station of VSIP Industrial Park, and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay property valuation report made by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay valuation panel specializing in criminal procedures. To be specific:

On July 04, 2017, by taking advantage of weaknesses in management of assets of F company (a wholly-foreign owned enterprise), Nguyen Van T, a company’s worker, has stolen 50 printer hardware pieces from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Company, worth VND 37,059,950.  Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant Nguyen Van T is considered to commit trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay “Theft of property” crime according to Article 138 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Criminal Code.

Although this is a less serious crime but trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant's acts not only infringes trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay property ownership of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay enterprise but also causes adverse influence on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay public order, especially foreign-invested enterprises in Hai Phong City.  Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay case must be handled according to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay criminal code.

[1]Factors for determining trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay sentence: Total value of assets stolen by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant is VND 37,059,950. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant does not have other aggravating factors, so he should be sentenced according to Clause 1 Article 138 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Criminal Code.

[2]Regarding mitigating factors: trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant has expressed his cooperative attitude and contrition; all stolen assets have been found; trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay crime committed by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant leas to less serious consequences; trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant commits a less serious crime and does not have prior criminal record; trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant's paternal grandfather used to join trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Resistance and now is a veteran; these mitigating factors are specified in Points g, h, p Clause 1 and Clause 2 Article 46 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nayxem bóng đá trực tiếp trên.  

trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant has a clear residential address, it is not necessary to impose an imprisonment sentence on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant. Putting trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant on probation is suitable for education and crime prevention purposes according to Article 60 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Criminal Code.

Deeming that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant has a difficult family background and unstable income, it is not necessary to impose fines on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant.

Regarding civil liabilities:trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay civil plaintiff does not request trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant to make compensation, so trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Trial panel shall not make judgment on this matter.

Regarding exhibits:

- Regarding 50 printer hardware pieces:  Stolen assets are legal assets of F company and F company has submitted a petition for getting back such assets, so trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Trial panel decides to return such assets to F company.

- Regarding 02 backpacks; 01 knife; 01 cardboard box; 01 suit:  trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant has used these things to commit trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay crime, and they cannot be used anymore. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Trial panel decides to confiscate and destroy them.

Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay court fees:trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant is liable to pay trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay court fees in accordance with applicable regulations.

For trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay said reasons,

trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay COURT DECIDES

- To declare that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant Nguyen Van T committed trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay “Theft of property” crime.

1. Regarding punishment:Pursuant to Clause 1 Article 138, Points g, h, p Clause 1, Clause 2 Article 46, Article 60 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Criminal Code,  Nguyen Van T is sentenced to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay imprisonment of 15 (fifteen) months but is given trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay suspended sentence. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay probation period is 30 (thirty) months commencing from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay date of announcement of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance judgment.

trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant Nguyen Van T shall be supervised and educated by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay People’s Committee of B commune, C district, Hai Phong City during trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay probation period.

2. Regarding exhibits:Pursuant to Article 41 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Criminal Code, Article 76 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nayCriminal Procedure Code in Viet Nam;

02 (two) backpacks; 01 (one) knife; 01 (one) cardboard box; 01 (one) suit shall be confiscated and destroyed.

50 (fifty) printer hardware pieces of 2.5 SATA 320 GB 500 GPTO brand shall be returned to F Co., Ltd. (Details of exhibits are specified in trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Record of delivery of exhibits made on September 28, 2017 at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Department of Civil Judgment Enforcement of Hai Phong City).

3. Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay court fees:trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant Nguyen Van T must pay VND 200,000 (two hundred thousand) of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay court fees for handling trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance criminal case.

4. Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay rights to appeal against trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay judgment: trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant present at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay trial shall have trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay rights to appeal against trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay judgment within 15 (fifteen) days from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay date of judgment announcement. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay civil plaintiff is entitled to appeal against trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay judgment within 15 (fifteen) days from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay date of receipt of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay judgment or from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay date on which trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay judgment is publicly posted in local area.