Judgment no. 15/2021/DS-ST on dispute over reclaiming land use right, claim for annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay contract for transfer trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right and annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right certificates

THE PEOPLE'S COURT trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay CAN THO CITY

JUDGMENT NO. 15/2021/DS-ST DATED APRIL 26, 2021 ON DISPUTE OVER RECLAIMING LAND USE RIGHT, CLAIM FOR ANNULMENT trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay CONTRACT FOR TRANSFER trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay LAND USE RIGHT AND ANNULMENT trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay LAND USE RIGHT CERTIFICATES

On April 23 & 26, 2021 at the headquarters trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the People's Court trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Can Tho City, the first instance trial was conducted to hear the case No. 105/2020/TLST-DS dated April 27, 2020 in the matter trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay"Dispute over reclaiming land use right, claim for annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right transfer contract, annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right certificate”.

According to Decision to bring the case to first instance trial No. 29/2021/QD-ST dated March 30, 2021 between:

* Petitioner:Ms.Nguyen Thi Ngoc T., born in 1961; Address: 1 P.L. GDNS, T. on MSI OC4, Canada.

Temporary address: Next to No. 17B1 Residential area 923, Ward A, District N.K., Can Tho City.

Authorized representative: Mr.Ngo H.T..

Address: No. 206/12 T.P., Ward C., District N.K., Can Tho City.

Address: No. 58C H., T.B. ward, N.K. district, Can Tho city.

* Respondent:Ms.Tran Thi Ngoc Y., born in 1994; Address: No. 59 T.Đ.T., Ward 6, Soc Trang city, Soc Trang province.

* Persons with interests and obligations related to the case:

1. Ms.Pham Thi Hong D., born in 1995; address:  No. 59 T.Đ.T., Ward 6, Soc Trang city, Soc Trang province.

2. Ms.Nguyen Thi Hong T., born in 1969;

Residence: 17B1 Residential area 923, Ward A, District N.K., Can Tho City.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

According to the petition filed by the petitioner, Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T:Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T. is an overseas Vietnamese in Canada. With the future plan to return to Vietnam to live, from 2014 to 2016, Mrs. T. bought a land plot in Can Tho city and asked her niece (daughter trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Mrs. T’s sister), Pham Thi Hong D. (born in 1995, residing at 59 Ton Duc Thang, ward 6, Soc Trang city, Soc Trang province) to put the following 3 land plots in her name: Land plot No. 419, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2; Land plot No. 422, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2; Land plot No. 505, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2, all 03 land plots are located in Area 7, Ward A, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City and were granted certificates trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use rights under the name trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Pham Thi Hong D..

In 2017, Tran Thi Ngoc Y (Ms. T’s niece) needed property to complete procedures for traveling abroad, so Ms. T. asked Dao to carry out procedures to transfer the title trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay above 03 land plots to Yen in the form trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay a contract trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay transfer, without handover trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay money. On these 03 land plots, Ms. T. built a house to live in together with 10 rooms for rent.

Currently, Ms. T has repatriated to Vietnam and registered her permanent residence in Bac Dan hamlet, My Phu commune, My Tu district, Soc Trang province. Due to the need to use it, Ms. T asked Tran Thi Ngoc Y. to carry out the procedures for transferring the title trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the three land plots mentioned above to Ms. T. but Yen did not agree and said that this was Yen's land. So, Ms. T. sued Yen for:

1. Annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the contract trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right transfer dated September 26, 2017 between Pham Thi Hong D. and Tran Thi Ngoc Y.; notarization number 762 volume No. 01/2017/TP/CC-SCC/HDGD notarized by Ngo Hong Thanh Private Notary Office on September 26, 2017.

2. Annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right, ownership trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house and other property on land, number BT 377125, issued on May 5, 2014, with title transfer made to Tran Thi Ngoc Y. on November 2, 2017; certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay ownership trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house and other property on land No. BT 377126, issued on May 5, 2014, with title transfer made to Tran Thi Ngoc Y. on November 2, 2017; certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right, ownership trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house and other property on land, number CB 593518, issued on January 13, 2016, with title transfer made to Tran Thi Ngoc Y. on November 2, 2017.

3. Recognition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the following land plots: Land plot No. 419, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2; Land plot No. 422, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2; Land plot No. 505, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2, all 03 land plots are located in Area 7, Ward A, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City and under the legal use right trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T.

4. Recognition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the above-mentioned property on land, including houses and constructions on land with a total built-up area trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay ​​about 200m2, under the ownership trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T.

Respondent Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y. was duly summoned but did not appear in court, so she did not have any comments to present.

According to an independent petition, the person with related rights and obligations, Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. presented:Ms. D. is a niece trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T. (her sister’s daughter). Mrs. T. is an overseas Vietnamese who plans to return to Vietnam in the future, so she bought land in Can Tho and put the three land plots in the name trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. D: Land plot No. 419, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2; Land plot No. 422, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2; Land plot No. 505, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2, all 03 land plots are located in Area 7, Ward A, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City. Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. have been granted certificates trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the above land plots. In 2017, Tran Thi Ngoc Y. completed procedures to travel abroad and got the consent trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. T., so Ms. D. transferred the title trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the three land plots above to Yen (only completing paperwork for transfer contract, no money handover). Due to the need to use it, Ms. T asked Tran Thi Ngoc Y. to carry out the procedures for transferring the title trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the three land plots mentioned above to Ms. T. but Yen did not agree. So, Ms. D. petitioned to annul the contract trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right transfer dated September 26, 2017 between Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. and Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y., claiming for annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the land use right certificate in Ms. Y's name to return the property to Ms. T.; Ms. D. agreed to return the above property to Ms. T. and Ms. T. is entitled to carry out the procedures for registration trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the right to use and ownership in accordance with the law.

The person with related rights and obligations, Ms. Nguyen Thi Hong T presented:As for the three disputed land plots, the land plot on which Ms. T. built the house was the one Ms. T. directly sold to Ms. T. The other 2 land plots on which Ms. T. built 10 rooms for rent were bought by Ms. T on behalf trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. T. Because Ms. T is an overseas Vietnamese, she asked Pham Thi Hong D. to put the property in her name. Then, because Tran Thi Ngoc Y. needed property to complete the procedures to study abroad, Ms. T asked Pham Thi Hong D. to put the property in Yen’s name. Ms. T. planned to only sponsor Yen for one year's tuition, but Yen thought that Ms. T. would support the entire course. When the parties talked about the above misunderstanding, a conflict arose, so Yen refused to return the property to Ms.T.. Currently, Tran Thi Ngoc Y. has still registered her permanent residence at her address in Soc Trang, but because she has been busy working far away, she is not often at home.

The property built on the land were built by Ms. T. about 2-3 years ago. Ms. T. has registered for temporary residence in a house on the disputed land. Because Ms. T. had to go far away in the coming time and was unable to appear in court, she requested for trial in absentia.

At the court hearing:

The authorized representative trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the petitioner, Mr. Ngo Hong Thuy, presented:The petitioner upheld the lawsuit claim to force Ms. D., Ms. Y to return Ms. T. the land use rights in the land plots No. 419, 422 , 505 at Area 7, Ward A, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City, which are in the name trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Y., recognizing Ms. T.’s right to own the land plots and property on land, Ms. T. is entitled to carry out the procedures for granting the certificates trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay ownership according to regulations.

The representative trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the People’s Procuracy trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Can Tho city in the trial addressed:

- Regarding proceedings:Since accepting the case according to first-instance procedures and at today's court hearing, the litigants and the Judge, Reporter, and Trial Panel have strictly complied with the provisions trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the civil procedure law.

- Regarding the content trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the case:Through the events during the court hearing and based on documents in the case file, the procurator proposed to accept a part trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the lawsuit claim trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the petitioner, Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T., and recognize Ms. T.’s right to own land use rights and property on land. Accept the independent petition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. on the annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the land use right transfer contract dated September 26, 2017 between Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. and Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y. due to a false contract; to re-issue the certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right to Ms. T. Petition the competent authority to revoke the certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right in Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y.'s name.

JUDGEMENT trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay THE COURT

Pursuant to documents and evidence examined at the court hearing, the results trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the adversarial process at the court hearing; the Trial Panel found that:

[1] In terms trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court procedures:

- Regarding the disputed legal relationship:  Considering that in the Notice trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay acceptance trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the case No. 11/TB.TLVA dated May 3, 2019, the Court determined the case as "Dispute over the contract for the transfer trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use rights", but based on the documents and evidence in the case file and on the basis trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the petition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the petitioner, Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T., independent petition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the person with related rights and obligations, Ms. Pham Thi Hong D., the Trial Panel considered this to be the legal relationship "Dispute over reclaiming land use right, claim for annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right transfer contract, annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right certificates" according to Clause 9 Article 26 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Civil Procedure Code 2015.

Because the petitioner, Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc T., has Vietnamese nationality but she has currently resided in Canada, according to Clause 3, Article 35, Point c, Clause 1, Article 37 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the Civil Procedure Code 2015, the case falls under the jurisdiction trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the People's Court trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Can Tho city.

The persons with related rights and obligations, Ms. Nguyen Thi Hong T. and Pham Thi Hong D. requested for trial in absentia. The respondent, Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y., was duly summoned by the Court but she did not appear in court for unknown reasons and the Court put up a notice for trial in the absence trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Y. Pursuant to Articles 227 and 228 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the Civil Procedure Code 2015, the Trial Panel conducted trial in the absence trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the involved parties in accordance with the law.

[2]. Regarding the content: Considering the petitioner's lawsuit claim, the independent petition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the person with related rights and obligations, Ms. Pham Thi Hong D.

Considering that:  land use right at plot No. 419, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2 with the certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right in the book No. CH 06593 issued on 05/5/2014; the land plot No. 422, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2 with the certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right in book No. CH 06592 issued on May 5, 2014; land plot No. 505, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2 with the land use right certificate in the book No. CH 09654 on January 13, 2014, were issued by the People's Committee trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ninh Kieu district to Ms. Pham Thi Hong D ., the land plots are located in Area 7, Ward A., Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City. On September 26, 2017, Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. signed a contract to transfer to Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y. three land plots mentioned above and the contract was notarized. The title trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay property was transferred to Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y. by the branch office trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land registration in Ninh Kieu district on November 2, 2017.

Although the land use rights trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plots 419, 422, 505 in the name trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y., the petitioner claimed that these land plots were purchased by the petitioner, but because she is an overseas Vietnamese, she asked Ms. D. to help receive the transfer and put the property in Ms. D’s name on her behalf; the petitioner then told Ms. D to transfer them to Ms. Y. for the purpose trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay carrying out procedures to go abroad. Due to the need to use it, Ms. T. asked Ms. Y to return the land use rights, but Ms. Y did not agree. Therefore, Ms. T sued Ms. D., Ms. Y, reclaiming the land use rights trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the land plots 419, 422, 505, claiming annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the land use right transfer contract between Ms. D. and Ms. Y., claiming annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the revised land use right certificate in the name trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Y.; requesting recognition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the right to use land plots and property on land plots for the petitioner.

In the commitment dated October 28, 2018 and the voluntary statement trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the person with related interests and obligations, Ms. Nguyen Thi Hong T, she confirmed that from 2014 to 2016, Ms. T. sent to Ms. T. the amount trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay VND 470,000,000 to buy the land plots No. 422, 419, 505 and asked Pham Thi Hong D. to put these land plots in her name on behalf trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. T.. Ms. T. knew that in 2017, Tran Thi Ngoc Y. borrowed Ms. T. the above three land plots to carry out the procedures to go abroad. Ms. T agreed, so she asked Pham Thi Hong D. to transfer ownership to the respondent's name.  When Ms. T asked for it back, the respondent rejected it.

In the commitment dated October 19, 2018 and the independent petition, Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. confirmed that from 2014 to 2016, Ms. T. asked Ms. D. to put three land plots No. 422, 419, 505 in Ms. D’s name. In 2017, at the request trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. T., Ms. D. transferred them to Ms. Y. in her name to go abroad and Ms. D. handed over the original certificates trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right to Ms. T. to keep. Now Ms. D. claimed annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the land use right transfer contract between Ms. D and Ms. Y. and annulment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use rights for the three land plots in the name trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Y., Ms. D. agreed to return this property to Ms. T..

Considering that the presentation trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. D. and Ms. T. were consistent with other evidence contained in the following documents: Land use right transfer contract dated December 10, 2015, representing Ms. Nguyen Thi Hong T. and Mr. Vo L.N. transferred to Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. the land plot No. 505; Two land use right transfer contracts on the same day on March 31, 2014, Ms. Tran Thi C.H. and Mr. Pham Dinh T. transferred to Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. the land plots No. 419, 422; according to the verification minutes dated May 15, 2020, Mr. Nguyen Van Hoang, the leader trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Group 2C, Residential Area 923, Ward A., provided information that the house and 10 rooms for rent on the disputed land were directly built by Ms. T. around 2018; according to the verification minutes at the Police Area 7, Ward A, Ms. T has registered temporary residence at house No. 17B1 residential area 923, ward A, Ninh Kieu district, Can Tho city, at the time when the rooms were put up for rent. Realizing that, the petitioner built a permanent house and 10 rooms for rent on the transferred land plots, she also had managed and used the land plots for a long time, but the respondent did not prevent or dispute. From the above evidence, it is grounded to determine that Ms. T was the one who paid to buy the land plots and asked Ms. D. to put the three land plots 419, 422, 505 in her name.

As for the land use right transfer contract dated September 26, 2017, signed between Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. and Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y.. The transfer trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land plots 419, 422, 505 in fact only expressed on paper because the transfer value trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay all three plots 419, 505, 422 in the contract was 100,000,000 VND, no actual money handover. The transfer amount in the contract has an inappropriate difference compared to the time trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 2014, Ms. T. sent VND 470,000,000to Ms. T. to buy three land plots. According to the price appraisal results on September 20, 2019, the market price at the time trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the dispute in the locality was VND 9,000,000 to VND 13,000,000/m2. At the trial, the petitioner's representative confirmed the signing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the contract between Ms. and Ms. Y was just on paper, in fact the two parties did not have the real purpose trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay transferring, there was no handover trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay money between the parties.

As for the signing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land transfer contract between Mrs. and Tran Thi Ngoc Y., although the petitioner could not provide a written agreement for putting the property in the respondent’s name, but through the testimony trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. D., Ms. T. proves that the transfer contract signed on September 26, 2017 between Mrs. and Ms. Y. was only a false contract, just on the paper.

In addition, according to Official Letter No. 210/STP-HCTP dated January 22, 2021 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the Department trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Justice trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Can Tho city, according to Vietnam Passport No. N172613 issued on January 9, 2014 to the petitioner, it is determined that the petitioner still holds Vietnamese nationality; the petitioner also still owns property which is other house and land at 10/2 Tam Vu Street, Hung Loi Ward, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City, according to the certificate number CA 348277 issued by the Department trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Natural Resources and Environment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Can Tho city on February 24, 2016. Therefore, the handover trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use rights and property on land; recognition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the property’s title trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the petitioner was grounded.

Pursuant to Clause 1, Article 166 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the Civil Code 2015, it was found that the petitioner's lawsuit claim has grounds to accept a part trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the petition for reclaiming the land use rights trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay three land plots 419, 422, 505 and recognizing the property’s title trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the petitioner. Pursuant to Clause 1, Article 124 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the Civil Code 2015, the independent petition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the person with related interests and obligations, Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. There are grounds to declare the contract dated September 26, 2017 signed between Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y. and Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. invalid due to falsification; propose the competent authority to revoke the certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right No. CH 06593 issued on May 5, 2014; certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right in the book No. CH 06592 issued on 5/5/2014; certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right in book No. CH 09654 issued on January 13, 2016, issued by the People's Committee trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ninh Kieu district, Can Tho city to Ms. Pham Thi Hong D., with title transferred to Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y . on the same day November 2, 2017.

According to the independent petition, Ms. D agreed to return all three land plots above to Ms. T. and Ms. T. is entitled to put property in her name as per the law. Pursuant to Clause 2, Article 221 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the Civil Code, Ms. D voluntarily transferred ownership trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the three land plots mentioned above to Ms. T.. Therefore, Ms. T. is entitled to carry out the procedures for transferring ownership in accordance with the law.

[3] When declaring the contract dated June 29, 2017 invalid, the interests trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the parties related to the signed contracts must be resolved. Realizing that, the person with related rights and obligations, Ms. D., Ms. T. admitted that Ms. D., Ms. Y. just signed the land transfer contract on paper and put the property on her name on paper, while the land plots and other expenses were paid by Ms. T. Deeming that this case does not cause damage when the contract is invalidated, so it is not necessary to determine the fault trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the parties causing the contract to be invalid to deal with the consequences.

[4] Regarding the effort to take care trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the property when putting the name under someone else’s property: At the trial, the authorized representative trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the petitioner determined that the disputed property had been managed and built by the petitioner; Ms. D., Ms. Y. only had her name on the papers and did not make any contributions during the time trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay putting property in their name. This testimony trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the representative was consistent with the testimony trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Nguyen Thi Hong T. in the record trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay declaration dated May 22, 2020. Therefore, there is no basis to consider the efforts trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. D., Ms. Y in this case.

[5] From the above analysis, it was found that the judgment trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the trial panel was consistent with the proposal trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the Procuracy at the trial.

[6] Regarding first instance civil court fee: Ms. T., Ms. D. received a refund trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the paid court fee advance.

Ms. Y must pay a court fee trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay VND 300,000

[7] Regarding the cost trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay on-site appraisal and first-instance property valuation: The total amount was VND 3,700,000.

The petitioner accepted and made the full payment.

For the foregoing reasons;

DISPOSITION

Pursuant to Article 26, Article 35, Article 37, Article 147, Article 227, Article 228, Article 271, Article 273 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay theCivil Procedure Code 2015

Pursuant to Clause 1, Article 124, Clause 1, Article 166, and Clause 2, Article 221 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay thetrực tiếp bóng đá

Pursuant to Clause 3, Article 100, Clause 1, Article 166, and Clause 1, Article 203 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay thetrực tiếp bóng.

Pursuant to Resolution No.Nghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14dated December 30, 2016 stipulating the court fees and charges, collection, exemption, reduction, management, and use thereof.

Declare:

1. Accept a part trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the lawsuit claim trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the petitioner, Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T.

Recognition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T’s ownership trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use rights in the land plot No. 419, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2; land plot No. 422, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2; land plot No.505, map sheet No.86, area 70m2, all located in Area 7, Ward A, Ninh Kieu district, Can Tho city that are all in the name trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the respondent Tran Thi Ngoc Y. according to the land use right in the book No. CH 06593; certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right in book No. CH 06592; certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right in the book No. CH 09654 issued by the People's Committee trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ninh Kieu district, Can Tho city on the same day trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay November 2, 2017.

Recognition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the above-mentioned property on land including: 1. Main house 01 ground floor, 01 first floor, reinforced concrete columns, 60 x 60 ceramic tiled floor, tin-roofed, steel beam trusses, plaster ceiling, construction area 88.63m2, usable area 177.26m2, remaining quality 94%. 2. Row trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay rooms for rent (10 rooms), reinforced concrete columns, 50 x 50 ceramic tile floors, tin-roofed, plaster ceilings, box steel trusses, 1.7m high ceramic tiled walls, usable area 158.4m2, the remaining quality is 94%, (according to the record trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay appraisal and review dated September 20, 2019) owned by Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T..

2. Accept the independent petition trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ms. Pham Thi Hong D.

- Declare the land use right transfer contract made on September 26, 2017 between Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. and Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y. invalid.

- Recognize that Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. voluntarily transfers the ownership trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the land plot No. 419, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2; land plot No. 422, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2; land plot No. 505, map sheet No. 86, area 70m2, all 03 land plots are located in Area 7, Ward A, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City to Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T.

- Propose the People's Committee trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Ninh Kieu district, Can Tho city to revoke the certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right, ownership trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house and other property on land, number CH 06593, issued on May 5, 2014; certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right, ownership trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house and other property on land in book No. CH 06592 issued on 5/5/2014; certificate trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right, ownership trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house and other property on land in book No. CH 09654 issued on January 13, 2016 to Ms. Pham Thi Hong D., with title changed to Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y. on November 2, 2017, in order for issuing new certificates to Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T. in accordance with the law.

Ms. T. has the right to register the land use rights with the competent authorities as per the law.

3. As for other matters:

- Regarding the cost trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance appraisal trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay assets: The total amount was VND 3,700,000. The petitioner accepted and made the full payment.

4. First instance civil fee:

- The petitioner may be reimbursed an amount trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay VND 300,000 (three hundred thousand dong) according to the receipt trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court fee advance No. 001034 dated April 24, 2019 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Department trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Civil Judgment Enforcement trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Can Tho City.

- The person with related rights and obligations, Ms. Pham Thi Hong D. received a refund trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the independent petition court fee advance trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay VND 300,000 according to receipt No. 000036 dated August 5, 2020 at the Civil Judgment Enforcement Department trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Can Tho city.

- Respondent Ms. Tran Thi Ngoc Y. must pay VND 300,000.

5. In case the court verdict or decision is enforced as per regulations in Article 2 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay theLaw on enforcements trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay civil judgments, the judgment creditor and judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 6, 7, 7a, 7b and 9 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the Law on enforcement trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay civil judgments, and the effective period trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay judgment enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the Law on enforcement trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay civil judgments.

6. Within 15 days from the date trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay judgment pronouncement, the petitioner is entitled to appeal; the respondent and person with related interests and obligations in absentia are entitled to appeal within 15 days from the date trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay receipt trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay the judgment or the judgment is posted up