trực tiếp bóng đá k+Judgment No. 244/2019/DS-PT dated august 21, 2019 on a dispute over land use right

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ PEOPLE’S COURT OF BEN TRE PROVINCE

JUDGMENT NO. 244/2019/DS-PT DATED AUGUST 21, 2019 ON A DISPUTE OVER LAND USE RIGHT

On August 21, 2019, at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ headquarters of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Court of Ben Tre province, a appellate trial is conducted to hear case No.  234/2019/TLPT-DS dated July 26, 2019 on a dispute over land use right.

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ First Instance Civil Judgment No. 44/2019/DS-ST dated June 7, 2019 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of district L which was appealed.

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Decision to Bring trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Case to Appellate Trial No. 195/2019/QDPT-DS of July 31, 2019, among trực tiếp bóng đá k+ involved parties:

- Plaintiff:Ms. Bach Ngoc B, born in 1942, residing at: No. 07, street H, ward 1, city M1, Tien Giang province.

Legal representative authorized by plaintiff:Mr. Bach Ngoc N3, born in 1978, residing at: Village N4, commune N5, district M4, Ben Tre province (under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ letter of authorization dated July 11, 2019).

- Respondent:Mrs. Pham Thi K, born in 1916, residing at: Village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province (died on September 20, 2018).

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successor of litigation rights and obligations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent:

1. Ms. Bach Ngoc B, born in 1942, residing at: No. 07, street H, ward 1, city M1, Tien Giang province.

2. Ms. Bach Ngoc H3, born in 1946, residing at: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province.

3. Mr. Tran Van M, born in 1950, residing at: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province.

4. Ms. Tran Thi S, born in 1955, residing at: No. 239/37, street K2, ward P, district P1, Ho Chi Minh City.

Authorized representative of Mr. Tran Van M and Ms. Tran Thi S:Mr. Tran Van N1 (under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ letter of authorizations dated August 1, 2019 and August 5, 2019).

5. Ms. Bach Ngoc A, born in 1943, residing at: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province (died).

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successor of litigation rights and obligations of Ms. Bach Ngoc A: 

5.1. Mr. Nguyen Ngoc T, born in 1935, residing at: village H1, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province.

5.2. Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T1, born in 1981, residing at: village Y, commune T5, district L, Ben Tre province.

5.3. Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T2, born in 1984, residing at: village Q, commune T5, district L, Ben Tre province.

5.4. Ms. Nguyen Thi Hanh D, born in 1987, residing at: village P2, commune T5, district L, Ben Tre province.

Authorized representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successor of litigation rights and obligations of Ms. Bach Ngoc A:Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T1 (under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ letter of authorization dated April 18, 2019).

Ms. Nguyen Thi Ngoc T1 filed a request trial in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ absentia to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court.

- Persons with interests and obligations related to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case:

1. Mr. Tran Van M, born in 1950;

2. Ms. Nguyen Thi M3, born in 1954;

3. Mr. Tran Van N1, born in 1985;

Co-residing at: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province.

Defense lawyer of Mr. Tran Van M, Ms. Nguyen Thi M3, Mr. Tran Van N1:Mr. Nguyen Hoang V1, lawyer of Nguyen Hoang V1 Law Office, affiliated to Bar Association of Ben Tre province.

4. Ms. Tran Ngoc H2, born in 1977, residing at: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province.

Authorized representative of Ms. Nguyen Thi M3, Ms. Tran Ngoc H2:

Mr. Tran Van N1 (under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ letter of authorization dated August 1, 2019).

5. Mr. Tran Van B1, born in 1967, residing at: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province.

6. Ms. Nguyen Thi T3, born in 1980, residing at: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province.

Mr. Tran Van B1, Ms. Nguyen Thi T3 filed a request trial in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ absentia to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court.

7. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of district L, Ben Tre province.

Legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of district L:Mr. Tran Van D - position: President.

Authorized representative of Mr. Nguyen Van D:Mr. Pham Van R – position: Deputy Manager of Division of Natural Resources and Environment of district L.

- Appellant:Ms. Bach Ngoc B who is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, Mr. Tran Van M who is both trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successor of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigation rights and obligations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related rights and obligations.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ CASE

Representation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, Ms. Bach Ngoc B, in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit petition and statements during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit settlement:

In 1972, Ms. Bach Ngoc B bought a piece of land of 3,900m2, covering land plots No. 1848 and 1849, map sheet No. 02, located in: Dong Nam village, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province (now is land plots No. 05 and 41, map sheet No. 16, located in: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province). Back to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ day when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land was bought, she lived abroad, so under applicable Vietnamese law at that time, she was not eligible for putting her name in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificate, after that she asked her mother, Mrs. Pham Thi K, to do so and also become a custodian of that piece of land. They also agreed that, in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ course of custody, Mrs. K may earn yield from that piece of land. In 1990, Mrs. Pham Thi K was issued with a land use right certificate by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of district T, Ben Tre province.

Thereafter, when she came back to Vietnam, Mrs. K agreed to return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land to her. On December 8, 2005, Mrs. Pham Thi K made a letter of authorization stating that Ms. Bach Ngoc B has trực tiếp bóng đá k+ exclusive right to take care of this piece of land and also gave trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificate to Ms. B. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ record of reconciliation dated February 11, 2006 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reconciliation board of Dong Nam village, commune V and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ record of reconciliation dated May 8, 2013 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of commune V, district L indicate that Ms. B, Mrs. K and Mr. M came into arrangement that Mr. M would receive an area of 1.300m2 in this piece of land, and Ms. B would receive trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining area. However, Mr. M and family have refused to return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land and have prevented her from visiting Mrs. K, thus, she requests Mrs. K to return her trực tiếp bóng đá k+ area of 2,600m2, a part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plots 1848 and 1849, map sheet No. 02, located in: Dong Nam village, commune V, district L.

Representation of Mr. Tran Van M, Ms. Tran Thi S, Ms. Nguyen Thi M3 in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statements and during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit settlement:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land in dispute was previously bought by Mrs. K from Mr. Nguyen Van P2 and Mr. Nguyen Van T4 in May 1975. After trực tiếp bóng đá k+ purchase, Mrs. K cultivated this piece of land and was issued with a land use right certificate by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of district L, Ben Tre province. Back to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ days when this piece of land was bought, it was just for growing miscellaneous crops, after that, Mrs. K, Mr. M and Ms. M3 have made land improvement. Around 1980, Mr. M and family moved to live together with Mrs. K and have cultivated this piece of land. Currently, Mr. M and family built 2 houses on this piece of land, 1 house for Mr. M, Ms. M3, Mr. N1 and Mrs. K to live (land plot No. 05, map sheet No. 16) and 1 house for Ms. H2 to build a beauty salon (land plot No. 41, map sheet No. 02).

With respect to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ letter of authorization dated December 8, 2005 supplied by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, he agrees with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ content of authorization and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ authorizing person. However, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ validity period of authorization is only 1 year. After December 8, 2006, that letter of authorization ceases to be valid. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ record of reconciliation dated February 11, 2006 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reconciliation board of Dong Nam village, commune V supplied by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ record of reconciliation dated May 8, 2013 have similar content. Nevertheless, after trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reconciliation, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ involved parties did not follow trực tiếp bóng đá k+ agreement in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reconciliation, so Mr. M changed his mind. As custodians of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land in dispute, Mr. M and Ms. M3 reject trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request of Ms. Bach Ngoc B. Ms. S, despite not a custodian of this piece of land, also agrees with Mr. M about that.

Representation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successor of litigation rights and obligations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent, Ms Bach Ngoc H3:

She agrees with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, Ms. Bach Ngoc B. She requests trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court to hold that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land must be returned to its owner.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successor of litigation rights and obligations of Ms. Bach Ngoc A:

Agree with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representation of Ms. Bach Ngoc H3 and have no further comment.

Representation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related rights and obligations, Mr. Tran Van N1 and authorized representative of Ms. Tran Ngoc H2:

Mr. Tran Van N1 agrees with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representation of Mr. Tran Van M.

Representation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related rights and obligations, Mr. Tran Van B1 and Ms. Nguyen Thi T3:

Mr. B1 and Ms. T3 built a house on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land in dispute (it is located in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ back side of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land). When trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house was built, there was no dispute between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties. Since trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties do not argue about trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house in which they are living, he gives no further request. Where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court determines that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land on which they built trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house belongs to Ms. B or Mrs. K, they agree to relocate upon trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land owner.

Representation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related rights and obligations, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of district L:trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land in dispute with area of 3,900m2 now covers trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plots No. 05 and 41, map sheet No. 16 and is located in: Village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificate thereof is in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ name of Mrs. Pham Thi K. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificate was issued to Ms. K with due process.

In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance civil judgment No. 44/2019/DS-ST dated June 7, 2019, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of district L held that:

Accept partial lawsuit petition of Ms. Bach Ngoc B concerning trực tiếp bóng đá k+ dispute over trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent Mrs. Pham Thi K.

Ms. Bach Ngoc B may receive:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land with area of 1,192.5m2, in land plot No. 41 of map sheet No. 16, located in: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province and all crops and facilities thereon.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land with area of 500m2, in land plot No. 05 of map sheet No. 16, located in: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province and all crops and facilities thereon.

(attached map).

Ms. Bach Ngoc B is obliged to complete trực tiếp bóng đá k+ paperwork for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer of ownership, split of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ said piece of land with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ competent authorities as per trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law.

Force Ms. Bach Ngoc B to refund Mr. Tran Van N1, Ms. Tran Thi H2 VND 45,198,000 (forty five million one hundred ninety eight thousand dong).

Force Ms. Bach Ngoc B to refund Mr. Tran Van M and Ms. Nguyen Thi M3 VND 43,000,000 (forty three million dong).

Recognize that Mr. M and Ms. M had made contribution to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land with area of 1,964.6m2 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land plot No. 05, map 16, located in: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificate thereof is in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ name of Mrs. Pham Thi K. In which, Mr. M and Ms. M3 has trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right of 982.3m2 and Mrs. K has trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right of 982.3m2.

Mr. M and Ms. M3 is obliged to complete trực tiếp bóng đá k+ paperwork for necessary adjustment associated with this piece of land with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ competent authorities as per trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law.

In addition, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment also pronounced trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court fee, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cost of proceedings, appeal right and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request for judgment enforcement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigants.

After trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance trial, on June 19, 2019, Mr. Tran Van M made an appeal, requesting to correct trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance civil judgment No. 44/2019/DS-ST dated June 7, 2019 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of district L and refuse trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire lawsuit petition of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff.

On June 20, 2019, Ms. Bach Ngoc B made an appeal, requesting to correct partial first instance civil judgment and accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ entire lawsuit petition of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, and she refused to refund trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of facilities and crops on land to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent and persons with related rights and obligations.

At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate trial, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff Ms. Bach Ngoc B and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successor of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigation rights and obligations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related rights and obligations, Mr. Tran Van M still uphold their appeals. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigants fail to agree on lawsuit settlement.

Defense of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defense lawyer of Mr. Tran Van M, Ms. Nguyen Thi M3, Mr. Tran Van N1:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff stated that she had bought trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land in 1972 for VND 2,500,000 but she emigrated to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ foreign country in 1979. So her statement claiming that she must ask Mrs. K to put her name in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificate because she has held foreign nationality is ungrounded. Mrs. K also did not confirm this event. Mrs. K had taken care and used this piece of land continuously, had registered and was issued a land use right certificate as per trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law. Request trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court refuse trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent, correct trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance civil judgment, and refuse trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit petition of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff.

Opinions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Procuracy in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial: In terms of procedural matter: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ participant in proceedings, presiding authorities or officers have complied with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Procedure Code; in terms of content matter: request trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance court neither accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff nor accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent, and uphold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance civil judgment.

After taking account of all documents and evidences available in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case file, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigants and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ adversarial process at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial;

JUDGEMENT OF trực tiếp bóng đá k+ COURT

[1] trực tiếp bóng đá k+ actual area of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land in dispute is 1,192.5m2, in land plot No. 41 and 1,164.5m2, in partial land plot No. 05, map sheet No. 16, located in: village N, commune V, district L, Ben Tre province. Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ origin of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff claims that she received transfer of it from Ms. Pham Thi K1 in 1972, and then, because of her foreign nationality, she asked her mother, Mrs. Pham Thi K, to put her name in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificate. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent Mrs. Pham Thi K and Mr. Tran Van M claim that this piece of land was transferred from Mr. Nguyen Van P2, Mr. Nguyen Van T4 in 1975, was used continuously and she was issued with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificate by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of district L.

[2] According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ written undertaking dated February 16, 2016 of Ms. Pham Thi K1, in 1972, she transferred trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land in dispute to Ms. B for VND 2,500,000. In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request for confirmation dated July 12, 2018, Ms. B states that she was allowed to emigrate to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ USA on May 23, 1979. So her statement claiming that she must ask Mrs. K to put her name in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificate because she has held foreign nationality is ungrounded. Mrs. K also did not confirm this event. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate trial, Ms. B also confirms that when emigrating to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ USA, she had no house or land left and she did not declare trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land in dispute as her asset with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ competent authorities when living abroad.

[3] trực tiếp bóng đá k+ letter of authorization dated May 18, 2005 and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ record of reconciliation dated February 11, 2006 dated May 8, 2013 do not stated that Mrs. K confirmed that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land in dispute was previously transferred from Ms. K1 to Ms. B and Ms. B asked her to put her name in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificate as well as Mrs. K agreed to return it to Ms. B. Mrs. K only authorized Ms. B to take care and use this piece of land and agreed to gift Ms. B trực tiếp bóng đá k+ area of about 2,000m2 and gift Mr. Tran Van M trực tiếp bóng đá k+ area of about 1,300m2.

[4] Accordingly, although Ms. B received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ piece of land in 1972, she did not emigrated to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ USA until 1979; furthermore, she did not take care or use this piece of land. Therefore, based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fact that Mrs. K had used this piece of land for a long time and continuously, had fulfilled all rights and obligations of a land user, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right certificated issued by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Committee of district L to Mrs. K is deemed legal.

From trực tiếp bóng đá k+ foregoing consideration, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court does not accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successor of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigation rights and obligations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related rights and obligations, Mr. Tran Van M, correct trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance civil judgment No. 44/2019/DS-ST dated June 7, 2019 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of district L.

[5] Regarding VND 2,230,000 charged for measurement and valuation of assets and taking of evidence which Ms. Bach Ngoc B is obliged to pay, she paid it already.

[6] Regarding court fees:

- First instance civil fee: Pursuant to point dd clause 1 Article 12, Article 26 ofNghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quy định về mứcdated December 30, 2016 of Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly, as a senior citizen, Ms. B is exempt from such fee.

Refund Ms. Bach Ngoc B trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court fee advance of VND 10,840,000 according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ receipt No. 0023840 dated October 18, 2017 of Sub-Department of Civil Judgment Enforcement of district L, Ben Tre province.

- Regarding appellate civil fee: Pursuant to point dd clause 1 Article 12, Article 29 of Resolution No. 326/2016/UBTVQH14 dated December 30, 2016 of Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly, as a senior citizen, Ms. B is exempt from such fee.

Refund Mr. Tran Van M trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court fee advance of VND 300,000 according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ receipt No. 0004369 dated June 25, 2019 of Sub-Department of Civil Judgment Enforcement of district L, Ben Tre province.

Therefore;

HEREBY DECIDE

Pursuant to Article 2 and Article 308, Article 309 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Criminal Procedure Code 2015 in Viet Nam;

Refuse trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff, Ms. Bach Ngoc B;

Accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of Mr. Tran Van M who is both trực tiếp bóng đá k+ successor of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigation rights and obligations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person with related rights and obligations.

Correct trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance civil judgment No. 44/2019/DS-ST dated June 7, 2019 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Court of district L, Ben Tre province.

Pursuant to Articles 166, 168 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Civil Code in Viet Nam; Articles 166, 170, 203 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Land Law in Viet Nam; Resolution No. Resolution No. 326/2016/UBTVQH14 dated December 30, 2016 of Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ National Assembly.

Declare:

Refuse lawsuit petition of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff Ms. Bach Ngoc B concerning trực tiếp bóng đá k+ dispute over trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use right against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ respondent Mrs. Pham Thi K.

Regarding VND 2,230,000 charged for measurement and valuation of assets and taking of evidence which Ms. Bach Ngoc B is obliged to pay, she paid it already.

With reference to court fees:

- First instance civil fee: As a senior citizen, Ms. Bach Ngoc B is exempt from this fee. Refund Ms. Bach Ngoc B trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court fee advance of VND 10,840,000 according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ receipt No. 0023840 dated October 18, 2017 of Sub-Department of Civil Judgment Enforcement of district L, Ben Tre province.

- Regarding appellate civil fee: As a senior citizen, Ms. Bach Ngoc B is exempt from this fee.

Refund Mr. Tran Van M trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court fee advance of VND 300,000 according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ receipt No. 0004369 dated June 25, 2019 of Sub-Department of Civil Judgment Enforcement of district L, Ben Tre province.

In case trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment is enforced as per regulations in Article 2 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Luật thi đá bóng trực tiếp dân sự 2008 Số hiệu 26/2008/QH12, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment creditor and judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 6, 7 and 9 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on enforcement of civil judgments, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effective period of judgment enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on enforcement of civil judgments.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate judgment takes legal effect from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date of pronouncement.