trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayJudgment no. 25/2020/HS-ST dated 13/08/2020 on obtaining property by fraud

PEOPLE’S COURT OF TUYEN HOA DISTRICT, QUANG BINH PROVINCE

JUDGMENT NO. 25/2020/HS-ST DATED 13/08/2020 ON OBTAINING PROPERTY BY FRAUD

On August 13, 2020, at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay office of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Court of Tuyen Hoa District, Quang Binh Province, a first-instance trial court is conducted to hear trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Case No. 21/2020/TLST-HS dated June 19, 2020 under trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Decision to Bring trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Case to Trial No. 21/2020/QDXXST-HS dated July 01, 2020 against:

Le Ngoc H, born on25/8/1985 in H District, Nghe An Province; permanent residence: D Village, S Commune, B District, Quang Binh Province; occupation: freelancer; education level: 12/12; ethnic group: Kinh; sex: male; religion: none; nationality: Vietnamese; father: Mr. Le Ngoc C, mother: Mrs. Duong Thi X (deceased); wife: Hoang Thi H, one child born in 2011; previous convictions and previous administrative violations: none; record: on 29/5/2020, imposed 18 months of community sentence by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Court of Bo Trach District, Quang Binh Province for obtaining property by fraud in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay First-Instance Criminal Judgment No. 29/2020/HS-ST, and starting to serve trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay community sentence since 14/7/2020. Present at trial.

- Aggrieved persons:

Mr. Pham Ngoc T, born in 1990, address: M Village, P Commune, T District, Quang Binh Province, absent. Mr. Doan Tien D, born in 1991, address: M Village, P Commune, T District, Quang Binh Province, absent. Mr. Nguyen Hai K, born in 1955, address: Subzone 2, D Town, T District, Quang Binh Province, absent.

- Persons with relevant rights and obligations: Mr. Cao Van T, born in 1972, address: Subzone 3, D Town, T District, Quang Binh Province, absent.

- Witnesses:

Mr. Pham Trung T, born in 1957, address: Subzone 2, Dong Le Town, Tuyen Hoa, Quang Binh, absent.

Mrs. Tran Thi Ai V, born in 1969, address: M Village, P Commune, T District, Quang Binh Province, present.

Mrs. Nguyen Thi M, born in 1967, address: M Village, P Commune, T District, Quang Binh Province, present.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay CASE

According to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay documents contained in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case file and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay progress at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay contents of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case are summarized as follows:

In early 2013, in Hanoi, Le Ngoc H met Mr. Nguyen Duc H, residing in C Commune, T District, Hai Duong Province, and gave him a letter of introduction containing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay signature and seal of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay director of Petromanning overseas working and service center - Vietnam oil and gas service and resource development joint-stock company branch to provide overseas working consultancy and brokerage services. Although he did not work for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay abovementioned company, H wrote his name on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay letter of introduction as an employee of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay company and provided overseas working brokerage services. In March 2013, via Mr. Pham Trung T, Le Ngoc H met and provided overseas working consultancy for Mr. Pham Ngoc T and Mr. Doan Tien D, who both lived in P Commune, T District. Hoa introduced himself as an overseas working broker of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay abovementioned company who directly recruited guest workers. Trusting H's introduction, Mr. T and Mr. D agreed to pay VND 35.000.000 each for Hoa to assist them with preparing documents for working in Saudi Arabia.

On 09/3/2013, Hoa phoned Mr. T and Mr. D to tell them to visit Hanoi for a health checkup and career orientation course, and request T and D to deposit VND 15.000.000 each on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay way. As they did not bring enough money, T phoned his mother, Mrs. Nguyen Thi M, and told her to bring VND 30.000.000 for both of them to Mr. Pham Trung T and ask him to send trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay money to H via Agribank - Tuyen Hoa District branch. During March - April 2013, H instructed T and D to visit Hanoi for health checkup, career orientation document preparation and other relevant procedures multiple times.

On 16/4/2013, at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay meeting point, T brought VND 15.000.000 and D brought VND 20.000.000 to D City to give to H. Here, H wrote receipts for both payments for T and D, each paying VND 35.000.000 (for VND 5.000.000 that T hadn’t paid, T and H agreed that T would pay H after leaving Vietnam). T and D signed agreements on working in Saudi Arabia presented by H and bearing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay name of Petromanning oil and gas service joint-stock company; according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay agreements, they would leave Vietnam on 05/7/2013 at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay latest. However, when trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay day arrived, T and D did not leave Vietnam as H had promised.

During trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same period and with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same method, by brokering overseas working document preparation, Hoa appropriated VND 20.000.000 from Mr. Nguyen Hai Khan, living in Subzone 2, Dong Le Town, Tuyen Hoa District, which was used to prepare documents for Mr. Khan’s son, Nguyen Van Hoa, to work abroad.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigating authority of Tuyen Hoa District Police issued a decision to bring trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case to Court on 22/12/2014 and a decision to press charges against Le Ngoc H for "obtaining property by fraud" on 23/12/2014. However, after committing his offences, H went to work in Germany from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay middle of 2014 to 17/01/2020, when H gave himself up to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigating authority of Tuyen Hoa District Police for his offences.

Besides trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay abovementioned offences, H also obtained property by fraud in B District. On 29/5/2020, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Court of B District imposed upon him 18 months of community sentence.

Conclusion No. 203/PC09 dated 13/3/2020 by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay forensic science office of Quang Binh Province Police concluded that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay writing in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay letter of introduction No. 07/GT by Petromanning overseas working and service center and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay writing in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay deposition of Le Ngoc H dated 04/02/2020 belonged to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same person.

Regarding exhibits: through investigation, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigating authority of Tuyen Hoa District Police seized trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay letter of introduction No. 07/GT of Petromanning overseas working and service center - Vietnam oil and gas service and resource development joint-stock company branch bearing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay name Le Ngoc H; seized and returned money to Mr. Pham Ngoc T and Mr. Doan Tien D, VND 15.000.000 each; these amounts were voluntarily returned by Le Ngoc H.

Regarding civil liabilities: during trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation, Le Ngoc H fully returned trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of money that he appropriated to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved persons.

In Indictment No. 26/CT-VKSTH-HS dated 18/6/2020 by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Procuracy of Tuyen Hoa District, Quang Binh Province, Le Ngoc H was prosecuted for “obtaining property by fraud" according to regulations in Point e Clause 2 Article 139 oftrực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 1999 Criminal Code, which was amended in 2009 of Viet Nam.

At trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay procurator upheld trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay prosecution decision and requested trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel to implement Point e Clause 2 Article 139; Points b, p and r Clause 1 Article 46; Clause 2 Article 46; Point g1 Clause 1 Article 48; Article 31; Article 47 and Article 51 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 1999 Criminal Code, which was amended in 2009, to impose 30-36 months of community sentence upon Le Ngoc H; not consider civil liabilities; and compel Le Ngoc H to pay trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance criminal court fee according to regulations.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant agreed with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay prosecution decision of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Procuracy of Tuyen Hoa District and arraignment of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay procurator at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial and requested trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel to consider reducing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant’s penalty.

JUDGMENT OF trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay COURT

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay contents of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case, documents in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case file which have been argued at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel finds that:

[1] Procedural acts and decisions of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigating authority, investigators, People’s Procuracy and procurator during trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation and prosecution are compliant with regulations of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayCriminal Procedure Code in Viet Nam. During trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation and prosecution and at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant and other procedural participants have no opinion or complaint. Thus, procedural acts and decisions of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay presiding agency and presiding officers are lawful.

[2] Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay offences: for profit, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant committed fraud via overseas working brokerage to appropriate property.

During trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation and at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant admitted to his offences. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant’s confession matched trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay statements of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved persons and persons with relevant rights and obligations as well as exhibits and documents collected and inspected at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial. Total value of property appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved persons is VND 85. 000. 000. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant committed his crime in March 2013, when trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 1999 Criminal Code, which was amended in 2009, was in effect, thus it was appropriate that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant be prosecuted according to regulations oftrực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 1999 Criminal Code in Viet Nam. Based on comprehensive and adequate consideration of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay exhibits in terms of time, location, type of property and value of property appropriated by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay procurator’s opinion, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel has sufficient grounds to confirm that Le Ngoc Hoa committed trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay crime of "obtaining property by fraud" provided in Point e Clause 2 Article 139 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 1999 Criminal Code, which was amended in 2009. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay prosecution decision of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Procuracy of Tuyen Hoa District and arraignment of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay procurator at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial regarding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant concern trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay right person and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay right crime and are lawful.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant’s acts deliberately appropriated property of Mr. Pham Ngoc T, Mr. Doan Tien D and Mr. Nguyen Hai K and violated ownership of property protected by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay law. Such acts posed a threat to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay society and must be strictly penalized. When trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant committed his offences, he was an educated young man with good health but refused to work to earn income lawfully; he disrespected trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay law and appropriated other people’s property. Therefore, it is necessary to decide a sentence appropriate to his offences according to regulations of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Code.

[3] trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant committed his crime multiple times, which constitutes aggravating circumstances according to regulations in Point g1 Clause 1 Article 48 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayCriminal Code in Viet Nam. However, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel also considers how trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant confessed earnestly and showed remorse during trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation and at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial; trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant did not use trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay money appropriated from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved persons directly but gave it to Mr. H and earned only trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay commission; trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant fully compensated trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved persons; while living at home, in July 2020, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant cooperated and provided valuable information for Bo Trach District Police to detect, capture and bring trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay “harboring prostitutes” case in P Town, B District to Court, which was confirmed by B District Police. In addition, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant's parents are people with meritorious services to revolutions; after making a getaway, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant gave himself up to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay police and confessed his crime; trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay aggrieved persons asked for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant's sentence to be reduced in writing; trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant's family is facing hardship as they live together with their father, who is older than 80, and his wife is pregnant. Therefore, it is necessary to consider reducing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant's sentence according to Points b, p and r Clause 1 Article 46 and Clause 2 Article 46 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 1999 Criminal Code, which was amended in 2009. Deeming that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant has multiple mitigating circumstances according to regulations in Clause 1 Article 46 and has a specific and stable place of residence, it is necessary to implement Article 31 and Article 47 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 1999 Criminal Code, which was amended in 2009, to impose a sentence lighter than trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay minimum sentence upon trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant and allow trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant to serve his community sentence in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay area where he resides, which are sufficiently strict and show leniency of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay law.

As trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant has no stable job and low income, he may be exempt from income deduction while serving his sentence.

[4] Regarding exhibits: considering that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay letter of introduction No. 07/GT of Petromanning overseas working and service center - Vietnam oil and gas service and resource development joint-stock company branch bearing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay name Le Ngoc H collected by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigating authority is a document related to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant’s offences, add it to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case file.

[5] Regarding civil liabilities: during trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation, Pham Ngoc T, Doan Tien D and Nguyen Hai K were fully compensated by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant and had no request at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial, thus, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel does not consider civil liabilities.

[6] In this case, Mr. Cao Van filed a denunciation accusing Le Ngoc H of appropriating VND 15.000.000 from him via fraud in overseas working consultancy and brokerage. However, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation could not find sufficient grounds for handling and Mr. Truong made no request.

In addition, according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant’s statement, Nguyen Duc H introduced and gave trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay letter of introduction of Petromanning overseas working and service center - Vietnam oil and gas service and resource development joint-stock company branch to Le Ngoc H for him to fill in and provide overseas working consultancy and brokerage. However, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation could not identify H’s residence, thus, there are insufficient grounds for handling.

Regarding use of a counterfeited letter of introduction bearing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay name of Petromanning overseas working and service center - Vietnam oil and gas service and resource development joint-stock company branch by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay investigation reveals that this name does not exist; on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay other hand, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay letter of introduction was given to H by Nguyen Duc H, thus, there are insufficient grounds for handling trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant for use of counterfeited documents/seals of regulatory bodies/organizations.

[7] Regarding court fees: Le Ngoc H must pay first-instance criminal court fee to state budget.

Based on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay abovementioned facts and matters,

HEREBY DECIDES

Pursuant to Point e Clause 2 Article 139; Points b, p and r Clause 1 Article 46; Clause 2 Article 46; Article 31; Article 47; Point g1 Clause 1 Article 48; and Article 51 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 1999 Criminal Code, which was amended in 2009; Article 136 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 2015 Criminal Procedure Code andNghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quy định về mứcby trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay National Assembly on rates, exemption, reduction, collection, payment, management and use of Court fees and charges.

1. Regarding offence title: declare Le Ngoc H guilty of “Obtaining property by fraud”.

2. Regarding penalties: impose upon Le Ngoc H 30 (thirty) months of community sentence. Adding 18 months of community sentence imposed in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay First-Instance Criminal Judgment No. 29/2020/HS-ST dated 29/5/2020 by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Court of Bo Trach District, total penalty incurred by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant shall be 36 (thirty-six) months of community sentence. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay penalty starts from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date upon which trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant starts serving trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay sentence of Judgment No. 29/2020/HS-ST dated 29/5/2020 by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Court of Bo Trach District, which is 14/7/2020.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant may be exempt from income deduction while serving his sentence.

Assign Le Ngoc H to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Committee of S Commune, B District, Quang Binh Province, which shall cooperate with his family in supervising and educating him while he serves his sentence.

3. Regarding exhibit handling: add trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay letter of introduction No. 07/GT of Petromanning overseas working and service center - Vietnam oil and gas service and resource development joint-stock company branch bearing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay name Le Ngoc H to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case file.

4. Not consider civil liabilities.

5. Regarding court fees: compel Le Ngoc H to pay a first-instance criminal court fee of VND 200.000.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay defendant, aggrieved persons and persons with relevant rights and obligations have trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay right to appeal against this Judgment within 15 days starting from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date of pronouncement (for those present at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial) or trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date this Judgment is duly served (for those absent from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay trial)./.