Judgment no. 32/2022/DSPT date 23/02/2022 on dispute over xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay claim for performance of payment obligations

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay SUPERIOR PEOPLE’S COURT IN DA NANG

JUDGMENT NO. 32/2022/DSPT DATE 23/02/2022 ON DISPUTE OVER xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay CLAIM FOR PERFORMANCE OF PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS

On February 23, 2022, at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay head office of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Superior People's Court in Da Nang, a public appellate hearing was held to hear xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay civil case No. 12/2020/TLPT-DS dated October 27, 2020 on "Dispute over xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay claim for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay performance of payment obligations".

As xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance civil judgment No. 17/2020/DS-ST dated August 27, 2020 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province was appealed.

According to Decision to bring xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case to appellate trial No. 1017/QDXX-PT dated February 12, 2022 between:

- Petitioner:

Ms. Nguyen Thi H; residential address:  Karl Marx Str 34b-15859 Siorkow, Federal Republic of Germany; temporary residence address:  House No. 138A, N street, P ward, N1 city, Khanh Hoa province, not appeared in court.

Authorized representative (Power of attorney dated July 20, 2016):

Mr. Hoang Vinh Y, born in 1952, residential address:  House No. 04, T Street, L ward, N1 city, Khanh Hoa province, appeared in court.

Defender:

LawyerNguyen Dinh T1- Law Office Nguyen Dinh T1, under xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Bar Association of Khanh Hoa province; address: No. 119 N2 street, P1 ward, N1 city, Khanh Hoa province, appeared in court.

1 - Respondent:

1. Ms. Nguyen Thi T2, address:P3 Allee 103, 14532 Stahnsclort, Federal Republic of Germany, appeared in court.

Authorized representative (Power of attorney dated November 15, 2020):

Ms.Tang Thi Thuy, born in 1950; residential address:  No. 16, M street, P1 ward, N1 city, Khanh Hoa province, appeared in court.

2. Mr. Do Q; residential address:P3 Allee 103, 14532 Stahnsclort, Federal Republic of Germany, temporary residence address: NV16-03 Phuoc Long B Urban Area, Phuoc Long Ward, N1 City, Khanh Hoa Province, not appeared in court.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Ms. Nguyen Thi T, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner, presented:

On August 31, 2004, she transferred to her sister and brother-in-law, Nguyen Thi T2 and Do Q, a business store named "L-P" in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay city of P3, Federal Republic of Germany, with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of 72,000 Euro, but being afraid that Ms. T2 and her husband have to prove xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay origin of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase amount and have to pay high taxes, so when doing xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay procedure to change xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Business License, she and Mrs. T2 agreed to only write on paper 15,000 Euros and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay support of 500 Euro/month until xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay debt of 72,000 Euro is paid off (according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Certificate of Indebtedness dated September 1, 2004, signed by Ms. T2). In 2015, she asked Khanh Hoa Debt Recovery Joint Stock Company to collect this debt, but it has not been done.  Therefore, she filed a lawsuit asking xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province to force Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Mr. Do Q to pay her xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer amount of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay "L-P" store of 72,000 euros.

Respondent:

- Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 presented:

Ms. Nguyen Thi H suing her about xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay payment obligation is not true; furthermore, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province was incorrect when determining that Mr. Do Q was xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant; because xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay dispute between Ms. Nguyen Thi H and her was an event in 2004, but she and Mr. Do Q got married in 2010. In addition, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay dispute was a civil transaction occurring in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany, between people residing in Germany.  She did not agree with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court's acceptance and settlement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case, so she asked xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court to return xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition and suspend xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay settlement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case.

- Mr. Do Q presented:

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay dispute between Ms. Nguyen Thi H and Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 was an event in 2004, but he and Ms. T2 got married in 2010. So, he did not agree with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court's determination that he participated in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay proceedings as a respondent, and he asked xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court to return xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition and suspend xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay settlement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case

At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court hearing:

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner presented:

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province accepted and settled xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay civil case according to its jurisdiction and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's claim was grounded, because in fact, in 2004, Ms. Nguyen Thi H sold to Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and her husband xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay store “L-P”, for 72,000 Euro.  Due to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay fear of paying high taxes, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay two sides agreed to write down on paper only 15,000 Euros and Mrs. H agreed to let Mrs. T2 and her husband pay 500 Euros each month until xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay debt was discharged, but then xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant did not perform xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay debt obligation.  Therefore, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner filed a lawsuit and asked xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court to force xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent to pay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner 72,000 euros, equivalent to a value of 1,963,296,000 VND (with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay exchange rate of 1 Euro = 27,268 VND of Vietcombank on July 21, 2020); also, continued to apply temporary emergency measures to freeze xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house of Mr. Do Q and Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 at 72 Nguyen Thien Thuat, L ward, N1 city, Khanh Hoa province to secure xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment enforcement.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent presented:

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province’s acceptance and settlement of this case was not within its jurisdiction according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, so it proposed to suspend xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay settlement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case and return xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition.  In case xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court does not suspend xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay settlement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case but continues xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial, it is proposed not to accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit petition of Ms. Nguyen Thi H; and request xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court to annul xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay decision on adoption of temporary emergency measures to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house at 72 Nguyen Thien Thuat, ward L, city N1, Khanh Hoa province of Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Mr. Do Q.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent, Mr. Do Q, presented:

He and Mrs. Nguyen Thi T2 registered their marriage in 2010, but it was just because they want to reside for a long time in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany, each person must register their marriage with a person with German nationality. In fact, Mr. and Mrs. T2 have been living together as husband and wife in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany since 1999, having a child named Julia, born in 2002 and in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay same year 2002, both sides of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay family had an engagement ceremony for him and Mrs. T2, at No. 05A T Street, L ward, N1 city, Khanh Hoa province.  While he and Mrs. T2 lived and did business in Germany, in 2004, Ms. Nguyen Thi H transferred to him and Mrs. T2 xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay "L-P" store exactly as Ms. H presented.  Because xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay store was xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay real estate in Vietnam, he and his wife were allowed by Ms. H to buy on credit and pay monthly installments. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paperwork, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay person’s name registered in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay ownership certificate and payments were all done by Ms. T2, he did not know xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay specifics.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance civil judgment No. 17/2020/DS-ST dated August 27, 2020 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province states as follows:

Pursuant to Clause 469, Clause 3 Article 26, Clause 3 Article 35, Article 37 and Clause 11 Article 114 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code; Articles 2 and 438 ofxoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code 2005; Section 1 of Resolution No.vtv2 trực tiếp bóngdated June 14, 2005 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly; Clause 1 Article 27 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayPháp lệnh án phí, lệ phí xem; xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court judges as follows:

1. Turn down xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Nguyen Thi H's petition against Mr. Do Q.

2. Accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition of petitioner, Ms. Nguyen Thi H, against xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent, Ms. Nguyen Thi T2.

Force Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 to pay Ms. Nguyen Thi H an amount of VND 1,931,544,000 (one billion nine hundred and thirty one million five hundred and forty four thousand dong).

3. Affirm xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Decision on application of temporary emergency measures No. 05/2016/QD-DS dated October 12, 2016 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province to secure xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment enforcement.

In addition, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgments also held xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance court fee and notified xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to appeal in accordance with law.

- On September 1, 2021, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent, Mr. Tran Manh, appealed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay entire judgment.

- On September 3, 2021, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner, Mr. Hoang Vinh Y, appealed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay entire judgment.

Pursuant to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay documents contained in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file which have been examined at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing; based on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay results of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay litigation at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court hearing on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay basis of fully considering documents and evidence, presentations of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay involved parties, defenders of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay litigants' legitimate rights and interests, opinions of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Procurator.

JUDGEMENT OF xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay COURT

[1]. After xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance trial, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representatives of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent both appealed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment; xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeals of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay involved parties were filed within xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time limit specified in Article 273 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, so xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel decided to bring xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case to appellate trial.

At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court hearing, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner upheld xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal and suggested that Mr. Do Q be obliged together with Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 to pay Ms. Nguyen Thi H 72,000 Euros, because Mr. Q and Ms. T2 have been living together as husband and wife since 2001, both of them bought Ms. H's store to do business together and serve their common life.  xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent claimed that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment had not properly assessed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay nature of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case, has not objectively considered xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay evidence and did not comply with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of law, so it is recommended for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court to amend xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment and does not accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's claim.  Thus, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay litigants failed to agree on lawsuit settlement.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Superior People's Procuracy in Da Nang proposed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel, based on Clause 1, Article 308 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, to:

- Not accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner and xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent; affirm xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance civil judgment.

[2]. Considering xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeals of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay litigants:

[2.1]. In terms of court procedures:

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner, Ms. Nguyen Thi H, sued Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Mr. Do Q to claim xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer amount of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay "L-P" store in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay city of P3, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany with a value of 72,000 Euros, equivalent to 1,963,296,000 VND.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province accepted and determined that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legal relationship settled in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case was "Dispute over xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay claim for performance of payment obligation". That was in accordance with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of Clause 3, Article 26 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code.

Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Mr. Do Q are Vietnamese, but have lived and worked in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany. Although xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay subject matter of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transaction is xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to manage and use property in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany, Ms. T2 and Mr. Q are both Vietnamese nationals and have real estate in Vietnam at 72 Nguyen. Thien Thuat, L ward, N1 city, Khanh Hoa province and real estate at NV16-03 Phuoc Long B urban area, Phuoc Long ward, N1 city, Khanh Hoa province.  Therefore, based on Clause 3, Article 35, Point a Clause 1, Article 37, and Point b, Clause 2, Article 469 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province accepted xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case within its jurisdiction.

During xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay settlement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case; on November 2, 2016, Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 gave up her Vietnamese nationality, but by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance trial (August 27, 2020), Ms. T2 had Vietnamese nationality and was living in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany. Thus, according to Article 471 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay jurisdiction to settle xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case does not change.

According to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay presentation of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay litigants (xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition - case file p. No. 01, 05, 06, 07 and 08; complaint - case file p.75), xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer of "L-P" store was carried out in 2004, Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 paid monthly installments of 500 Euro, starting in September 2004. Therefore, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province was right when it applied Article 2 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay 2005 Civil Code; Section 1 of Resolution No. 45/2005/NQ-QH11 dated June 14, 2005 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly to apply xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay 2005 Civil Code, to settle xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay dispute.

[2.2]. Regarding xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content:

[2.2.1]. For xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent:

To prove xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit claim, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner (Ms. Nguyen Thi H) provided xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay original of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay working minutes dated July 13, 2015 (case file p.325), between Khanh Hoa Debt Recovery Joint Stock Company and Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Ms. Nguyen Thi H, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content shows that Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 acknowledges that she owes Ms. Nguyen Thi H an amount of money from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase and sale of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay "L-P" store; photocopy of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay handwritten paper dated September 1, 2004, in a foreign language with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay signatures and full names of Ms. Nguyen Thi H, Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and a translation of this handwritten paper into Vietnamese dated August 20, 2015 (case file p.393, 394 and 395), showing xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content:“I am Nguyen Thi T2 acknowledges that I will pay my sister Nguyen Thi H 500-€ monthly to cover her living expenses.  Ms. Nguyen Thi H sells her store to me on August 31, 2004. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay price is 15,000€, I must pay monthly installments of 500-€ to her, starting in September 2004” - signed by interpreter Nguyen Van Nghia and stamped by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay company (certified/legalized by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Embassy of Vietnam in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany on July 11, 2016) and provide a photocopy of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay acknowledgement of indebtness dated June 10, 2016 of a person named Nguyen Thi Minh Hong (case file p.49), with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content that Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Mr. Do Q bought xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay store "L-P" of Ms. Nguyen Thi H. In addition, to prove xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal request, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner also said that at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court on August 26, 2020, Mr. Do Q acknowledged xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase of Ms. Nguyen Thi H's "L-P" store, but because Ms. H did not have a payroll, they wrote xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay price of 15,000 Euro to avoid having to prove it to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay host country agency.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent said that when he received xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorization, Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 confirmed that there was no purchase and sale of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay "L-P" store with Ms. Nguyen Thi H; Ms. T2 does not work and does not sign any documents with Khanh Hoa Debt Recovery Joint Stock Company.  If xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner asserted that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay working minutes dated July 13, 2015, between Khanh Hoa Debt Recovery Joint Stock Company and Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Ms. Nguyen Thi H was real true, it needs to be proved by requesting xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court to seek expert assessment of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay handwriting and signature of Ms. T2. If xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay handwriting and signature are from Ms. Nguyen Thi T2, whether there is any basis for considering xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase and sale of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay store; how xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay monthly installments were made. Therefore, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent did not accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's petition.

Considering xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay documents and evidence provided by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel found that:

- For xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay working minutes dated 13-7-2015, between Khanh Hoa Debt Recovery Joint Stock Company and Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Ms. Nguyen Thi H:

(1) With reference to methods:xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay front side of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay working minutes says that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay representatives of Khanh Hoa Debt Collection Joint Stock Company are Mr. Do Hoang V and Mr. Nguyen Minh D, but xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay back of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay working minutes is signed by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay person who represents xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Company, Mr. Nguyen Huu Tri.(2).Regarding xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content:on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay front, it says:"Ms. T2 said that Ms. H's purchase was 72,000 Euros, Ms. T2 paid it all for Ms. H, for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay reason of trusting her siblings, so when giving money there was no paper", but there is no signature to confirm this content of Ms. Nguyen Thi T2.

Thus, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay form and content of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay working minutes dated July 13, 2015 are not in accordance with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law on debt acknowledgement, because:  At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay section stating xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay debt acknowledgement, there is no signature of Ms. Nguyen Thi T2; on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay other hand, if there is a signature and full name of Nguyen Thi T2, it is not enough ground to confirm that it is xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay signature and handwriting of Ms. Nguyen Thi T2. In addition, in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay voluntary statement dated March 3, 2020 (case file p.325), Mr. Do Hoang V confirmed:"In 2015, Khanh Hoa Debt Recovery Joint Stock Company received authorization to recover debts from Ms. Nguyen Thi. H. After many times of working, she found that Ms. H's file had many disputes between xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay two parties, so xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay company returned xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay file and canceled xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contract with Ms. Nguyen Thi H”.This confirmation does not show whether xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay representative of Khanh Hoa Debt Collection Joint Stock Company, Mr. Do Hoang V, worked directly with Ms. Nguyen Thi T2.  Therefore, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent’s claim that they did not work and sign any documents with Khanh Hoa Debt Recovery Joint Stock Company is grounded.

- For a handwritten paper dated September 1, 2004 in a foreign language signed by Ms. Nguyen Thi H and Ms. Nguyen Thi T2:

Attached with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay handwritten note dated September 1, 2004 is a translation into Vietnamese, with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content showing that Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 bought Ms. Nguyen Thi H's store for 15,000 Euros (certified/legalized by consular July 11, 2016).

In Clause 3, Article 96 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code on handing over documents and evidence, it is stipulated that:“3) xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay involved parties hand over to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court documents and evidence in ethnic minority languages ​​and foreign languages must be accompanied by a translation into Vietnamese, which is legally notarized and authenticated”; Points a, b, Clause 2, Article 478 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code on recognition of papers and documents sent to Vietnamese courts by foreign agencies, organizations and individuals stipulates that: “2) Vietnamese courts recognize papers and documents made by individuals residing abroad in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay following cases:

a) Papers and documents made in foreign countries are notarized and authenticated in accordance with foreign laws and have been consularly legalized;

b) Papers and documents made in Vietnamese by Vietnamese citizens abroad, signed by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay maker of such papers and documents, and notarized and authenticated in accordance with Vietnamese law” and Article 3 of Decree No. 111/2011/ND-CP dated August 24, 2010 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Government on consular certification and legalization stipulates that: “Consular certification and legalization is certification of seals, signatures, titles on papers, excluding certification of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content and form of papers and documents”.

Thus, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay translation (typed), was signed and stamped by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay interpreter Nguyen Van Nghia, but this document was not notarized or authenticated according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay host country. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay consular legalization at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay document only means certifying xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay seal, signature and title of Mr. Nguyen Van Nghia, not implying certification of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content of this document.  In addition, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay document that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner provided and confirmed as xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay debt acknowledgement letter of Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 is just a photocopy; during xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay settlement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner said that due to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay long time, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay original was lost, so it could not be handed over to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court for assessment. However, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance Court used this document to settle xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case, which was erroneous in its assessment of evidence.

- For xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Confirmation dated June 10, 2016:

Clause 1, Article 95 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code stipulates:“A readable document shall be considered as evidence if it is an original or a copy that is notarized or legally authenticated or provided or confirmed by a competent agency or organization”.

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay confirmation dated June 10, 2016, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay person named Nguyen Thi Minh Hong states that:“Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Mr. Do Q bought Ms. Nguyen Thi H's L-P store for 72,000 Euros, but because of short of money and tax declaration reasons, Ms. T2 wrote a promissory note for Ms. H with a debt of only €15,000”.However, this document is only a photocopy and is not notarized or authenticated according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay regulations of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay host country, not consular legalized or notarized or authenticated according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of Vietnamese law. Therefore, according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of Clause 1, Article 95 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, this document is not considered as evidence.

- For xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay testimony of Mr. Do Q confirming xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase of "Late Shop" from Ms. Nguyen Thi H:

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court determined that:“…At xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court, Mr. Do Q determined that in 1998, when he first came to Germany to do business, he knew Ms. Hoa and Ms. Tam.  When I and Ms. Tam got married, my wife and I bought from Ms. Hoa a stall for trading, worth 72,000 Euros.  Due to fear of paying high taxes, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay two sides agreed to only write 15,000 Euros.  Later we (Tam - Quang) divorced, I don't know if Ms. Tam paid Ms. Hoa yet, but xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase of Ms. Hoa's stall was real”.Through checking xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay minutes of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance court hearing in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file, there was no testimony that Mr. Do Q identified xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content as xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment cited above.  In xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay minutes of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance court hearing dated March 5, 2020, Mr. Do Q stated, "I have lived as husband and wife with Ms. Nguyen Thi T2, have lived in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay same house and have 04 children, but xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay fact that I do not know if Ms. T2 bought xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay shop from Ms. H", "I do not agree with Ms. Nguyen Thi H's petition, because I do not know anything about xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase " and in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court Minutes dated August 26, 2020, Mr. Do Q declared:"In 2004, Ms. T2 and I bought xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay L-P store from Ms. H, I did not ask or know anything about xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase contract, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay payment, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay register of store ownership with authorities. All xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay things were done by Ms. T2 and Ms. H".Thus, Mr. Do Q has many testimonies and these testimonies contradict each other.  There is a testimony that Mr. Q asserts that he does not buy xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay store or does not know about buying xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay store, there is a testimony that Mr. Q says that he buys xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay shop, but he does not know xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay procedure for buying and paying money.  Although, at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court on August 26, 2020, Mr. Do Q stated that he had a shop purchase, but this testimony was at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time when Mr. Q and Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 were divorced and there was a dispute about xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and land at 72 Nguyen Thien Thuat, ward L, city N1, Khanh Hoa province, so this statement is not valid enough to prove.

Based on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above analyzed evidence and documents, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel has sufficient grounds to assert that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay documents provided by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner are not valid enough to be used as evidence for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay resolution of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case.  xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance court used these documents as evidence and determined that Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 bought xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay "L-P" store in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany from Ms. Nguyen Thi H, and:“Accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition of Ms. Nguyen Thi H; force Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 to pay Ms. Nguyen Thi H an amount of VND1,931,544,000”. This decision was made on a non-solid basis, seriously affected xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legitimate rights and interests of Ms. Nguyen Thi T2.

Thus, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay evidence provided by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner has no legal value to prove xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay legitimacy, so it cannot be used by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel as evidence in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay settlement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case; therefore, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent to refuse to accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's petition is grounded and should be accepted by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel.

[2.2.2]. For xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner:

xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner suggested that Mr. Do Q be obliged together with Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 to pay Ms. Nguyen Thi H 72,000 Euros, because Mr. Q and Ms. T2 have been living together as husband and wife since 2001, both of them bought Ms. H's store to do business together and serve their common life.  However, because xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent's appeal is well-founded, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel did not accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's appeal.  In case, if xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's appeal is considered, there is no basis to force Mr. Do Q to be obliged to pay for xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase of "L-P" store together with Ms. Nguyen Thi H, because:  Although at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court on August 26, 2020, Mr. Do Q admitted that in 2004, he and Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 lived together as husband and wife, but because they had not yet acquired citizenship in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany, they had not completed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay procedures for marriage registration.  In 2011, Mr. Q and Ms. T2 registered their marriage and were granted xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Marriage Certificate No. 165/2011/CNKH, Volume 17 dated September 22, 2011 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Embassy of Vietnam in xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Federal Republic of Germany (case file p.72). In 2016, Mr. Q and Mrs. T2 divorced and were resolved by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Berlin State Court, Federal Republic of Germany.  Therefore, according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of Vietnamese law, in 2004, Mr. Do Q and Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 were not husband and wife, so there were no obligations of husband and wife under xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on Marriage and Family in 2000; therefore, Mr. Do Q is not obliged to join Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 to pay xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of 72,000 Euro to Ms. Nguyen Thi H (if there is a purchase and sale of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay "L-P" store).

Thus, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner has been considered by xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel, but there is no basis for acceptance.

[2.2.3]. For xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay application of temporary emergency measures:

Pursuant to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay "Application for prohibition of property transfer" dated August 8, 2016 by Ms. Nguyen Thi H (case file p.47); on October 12, 2016, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province issued xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Decision to apply temporary emergency measures No. 05/2016/QD-DS to freeze xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay property, which is xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 72 Nguyen Thien Thuat, Ward L, N1 city, Khanh Hoa province of Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Mr. Do Q (case file p.55) and to secure xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay enforcement of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment, at xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance civil judgment No. 17/2020/DS-ST dated August 27, 2020, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province affirmed xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay decision to apply temporary emergency measures to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay (above) house and land.  However, because xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent was accepted, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel decided to annul xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay decision on temporary emergency measures so that xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay involved parties can exercise their right to possession, use and disposition of this property.

[3] Regarding court fees:

- Since xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance judgment is corrected not to accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner's lawsuit, Ms. Nguyen Thi H must bear xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance civil court fee with related to monetary claim as prescribed by law; and because xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal is not accepted, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner must bear xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate civil court fee.

- Since xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal is accepted, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent shall not be liable to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate civil court fee.

For xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foregoing reasons;

DISPOSITION

1. Pursuant to clause 2 Article 308 and Article 309 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code.

- Do not accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner, Mr. Hoang Vinh Y.

- Accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay authorized representative of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent, Mr. Tran Manh.

- Correct xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first-instance civil judgment No. 17/2021/DS-ST dated August 27, 2021 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province.

2. Pursuant to Clause 3 Article 26, Clause 1 Article 95, Clause 3 Article 96, Point g Clause 1 and Clause 2 Article 138, Points a and b Clause 2 Article 478, Point c Clause 1 Article 469 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay; Articles 116, 119 and 122 ofxoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code, judge as follows:

2.1. Do not accept xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition of Ms. Nguyen Thi H against Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Mr. Do Q about "forcing Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 and Mr. Do Q to pay Ms. Nguyen Thi H 72,000 Euros, equivalent to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay value of 1,963,296,000 VND”.

2.2. Annul xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay decision on temporary emergency measures No. 05/2016/QD-DS dated October 12, 2016 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Khanh Hoa province (with xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay decision attached to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate judgment).

2.3. Return Mr. Hoang Vinh Y; Residential address:House No. 04 T Street, L Ward, N1 City, Khanh Hoa Province, xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 80,000,000 (eighty million VND) deposited at a Term Savings Card No. PK 4935468 on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay day of issue October 13, 2016 of Vietnam Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade (Vietinbank) - Khanh Hoa Branch.

3. Regarding court fee:

Pursuant to Clause 1, Article 147, Clauses 1 and 2, Article 148 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayCode Civil Procedure; Clause 3, Article 26, Clause 1 and Clause 2, Article 29 of Resolution No.Nghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly Standing Committee dated December 30, 2016 on xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amounts of collection and exemption, reduction, collection, payment, management and use of court fees and charges.

3.1. Regarding first-instance civil court fee:

- Ms. Nguyen Thi H must bear VND 74,411,754 for first-instance civil court fee related to monetary claim, but this will be deducted from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paid court fee advance of VND 16,366,500 according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt of court fee advance No. AA/2016/0000038 dated August 2, 2016 of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Judgment Execution Department of Khanh Hoa province; Ms. Nguyen Thi H also has to bear 58,045,254 VND (fifty eight million zero hundred forty-five thousand two hundred and fifty four dong) of first-instance civil court fee.

- Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 is not liable for a civil first instance fee.

3.2. Regarding appellate civil fee:

- xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner, Ms. Nguyen Thi H, must bear 300,000 VND (three hundred thousand dong) of appellate civil court fee, but this will be deducted from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paid appellate court fee advance of 300,000 VND (three hundred thousand dong) according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt of court fee advance No. AA/2016/0001322 dated September 25, 2020 (paid on behalf of Mr. Hoang Vinh Y) of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Judgment Enforcement Department of Khanh Hoa province, now converted into court fee; Ms. H has fully paid xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate civil court fee.

- xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay respondent, Ms. Nguyen Thi T2 is not subject to appellate civil court fee; return Ms. T2 xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paid appellate court fee advance of 300,000 VND (three hundred thousand VND) according to xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court fee advance receipt No. AA/2016/0001326 dated October 1, 2020 (paid by Mr. Tran Manh) of xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Judgment Enforcement Department of Khanh Hoa province.

4. xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate judgment takes legal effect from xoilac tv trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date of pronouncement.