trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayJudgment no. 344/2019/DS-PT dated august 14, 2019 on a dispute over land use right

  SUPERIOR PEOPLE’S COURT IN HO CHI MINH CITY

JUDGMENT NO. 344/2019/DS-PT DATED AUGUST 14, 2019 ON A DISPUTE OVER LAND USE RIGHT

On August 14, 2019,  trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City opens a public first-instance trial of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay civil case No. 140/2019/TLST-DS dated March 6, 2019 on "Dispute over land use right".

As trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first instance civil judgment No. 06/2018/DS-ST dated August 9, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Court of province T was appealed.

According to Decision to bring trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case to appellate trial No. 1480/2019/QDPT-DS dated July 12, 2019 between:

1. Petitioner:Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T, born in 1958 – not appearing in court;

Address: 448 Lac Long Quan, Neighborhood 4, Ward 4, City T, Province T;

Legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plaintiff:Legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay plaintiff: Mr. Nguyen Thanh H, born in 1959; Address:  62/1 Phan Dang Luu, Neighborhood 1, Hoa Thanh Town, District H, Province T (Letter of authorization letter dated June 20, 2019) – appearing in court.

2. Respondent:Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K, born in 1973 – not appearing in court;

Address: 446 Lac Long Quan, Neighborhood 4, Ward 4, City T, Province T;

Legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay respondent:Ms. Nguyen Van T1, born in 1953. Address: Address: No. 96 Nguyen Van Rop, Neighborhood 1, Ward IV, City T, Province T (Letter of authorization dated May 13, 2019) – appearing in court.

3. Persons with interests and obligations related to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case:

3.1. Ms. Le Thi Hue D, born in 1951 – appearing in court;

Address: Address: 509 Benj Creek Dr.Garland TX 75040 USA; Address (on appeal petition):  10547 Black Walnut Drive Dallas T 75243 USA.

3.2. Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H, born in 1976 - Not appearing in court;

Address: 446 Lac Long Quan, Neighborhood 4, Ward 4, City T, Province T;

Legal representatives of Ms. Le Thi Hue D and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H:Ms. Nguyen Van T1, born in 1953. Address: Address: No. 96 Nguyen Van Rop, Neighborhood 1, Ward IV, City T, Province T (Letter of authorization dated May 13, 2019) – appearing in court.

3.3. Tran Nguyen Le V, born on August 22, 1999 – not appearing in court;

3.4. Tran Nguyen Thao V1, born on September 13, 2001 – not appearing in court;

3.5. Tran Nguyen Anh D1, born on March 9, 2004 – not appearing in court;

They are all children of Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H and reside at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same address as Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H.

Legal representatives of Tran Nguyen Thao V1 and Tran Nguyen Anh D1: Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H – not appearing in court.

4. Appellants and protesters:

4.1. Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H.

4.2. Ms. Le Thi Hue D.

4.3. Chief Procurator of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Procuracy of Province T.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Representation of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay petitioner, Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T, in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay lawsuit petition dated July 12, 2016 and subsequent statements:

Mrs. Le Thi G, Mrs. Nguyen Kim H2 (Mrs. Nguyen Thi Thu T's mother) and Mrs. Nguyen Thi N (Mrs. Le Thi Hue D's mother) are siblings.

In 1983, Mrs. G made a will leaving trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land area of ​​5,000 m2 to Mrs. H2, but after making trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay will, Mr. G sold many parts of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land, leaving only an area of ​​1,722 m2. In 1985, Mr. G died. In 2002, Mr. H2 was granted a land use right certificate No. 02895 with an area of ​​1,722 m2. After Mr. H2 died, Mrs. T inherited trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land and was granted a land use right certificate No. CH 00348 dated December 10, 2010, plot No. 286, map sheet No. 15, area 1,722 m2, located in Neighborhood 4, Ward 4, City T, Province T.

At trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same time as making trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay will, Mr. G made a document, giving Mrs. Le Thi Hue D a free-rent shelter on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land area of ​​90.4 m2 in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay area of ​​land which Mr. G made a will leaving Mr. H2. Mrs. D built a temporary house, with 04 pillars, corrugated iron roof, and walls shared by two adjacent houses. She had lived here until 2007 when she moved to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay United States to settle down and handed over trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house to her son and daughter-in-law, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K, and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1 who have taken care and lived here so far.

Mr. K has his own house and recently Mr. K has repaired and built a permanent house on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land in question, so Ms. T filed a lawsuit to request trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Court to force Mr. K to dismantle trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay works on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land and return trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay above-mentioned land because Mr. only allowed Mrs. D to live rent-free on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land, now that Mrs. D is no longer in Vietnam, he has to demolish his house and return trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land to Mrs. T.

Representation of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay respondent, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay legal representative of Mr. K:

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land in dispute was left by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay great-grandparents, looked after by Mrs. G. In 1983, Mrs. G made a will leaving it to Mr. H2, but at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same time, she also made a handwritten note leaving it to his mother, Mrs. D, a part of land area of ​​more than 100 m2 to build a house, not to be sold to other people. When Mrs. G gave her land, Mrs. D did not apply for a land use right certificate, until it was discovered that Mrs. H2 had been granted a land use right certificate for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay entire land, and then Mrs. D filed a lawsuit to ask Mrs. H2 to carry out trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay procedures for transferring trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land. Mrs. H2 agreed, but she died thereafter due to poor health, while trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land transfer had not been done Mrs. D asked Mrs. T to complete trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land transfer, but Ms. T did not agree.

His family lived on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land from 1982 to 2007. When Mrs. D went abroad, she made a power of attorney for him to look after and keep trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay above mentioned land. Currently, he is living with his wife and three children and has no other place to live. Through trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay time, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house has been damaged, so he asked Mrs. T to let him repair it. When he raised trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay floor, Mrs. T did not agree and reclaimed trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land.

He does not agree to return trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land to Mrs. T because that is Mrs. D's house and land, he is only trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay person authorized by Mrs. D to look after and keep trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house, and land and he will not transfer it to other people.

Representation of person with related rights and obligations, Mrs. Le Thi Hue D, in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay voluntary statement dated February 5, 2018:

Her maternal grandparents, Nguyen Van L and Nguyen Thi M, had a plot of land facing Ngo Tung Chau street (now Lac Long Quan), 54 meters wide. They had 6 children, including: Nguyen Thi T2 (Mr. Dang Van R's mother), Nguyen Thi K1, Nguyen Thi A (Mrs. Nguyen Thi Xuan M1's mother), Nguyen Thi G, Nguyen Thi Kim H2 (Mrs T's mother). ) and Nguyen Thi N (Mrs. D and Mrs. H3's mother,). While they were alive, they left a part of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay church land to Mrs. G to look after and worship ancestors; trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay middle of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land was intended for a burial place for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay family, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay rest was divided equally to 6 children. As for Mr. N's portion, deeming that her grandparents suffered financial hardship, she paid for it as if she bought trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land. Therefore, in 1971, Mrs. G let Mrs. H3 build a house on church land. Mrs. H2 brought her son, Mrs. T, to live with Mr. G in 1958.

In 1975, Mr. G sold all trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land and church to Mrs. Xuan M1 (A's son), Mrs. M1 lived here until 1978, when she crossed trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay border and left many property to Mr. G, and Mrs. H2 for keeping on her behalf. Therefore, Mr. G and Mrs. H2 still lived on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land in question. In 1981, Mrs. G let her build a house next to Mrs. H3's to return her mother's portion. n 1983, Mr. G made a will leaving all her property to Mrs. H2 and made a document leaving two sisters, including her and Mrs. H3, a part of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land, 11.2 m top wide, 9.2 m bottom wide, and 17 m long. In 1991, Mrs. H3 immigrated to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay United States. She told Mrs. H2 to leave her land to Mrs. D, but Mrs. H2 did not agree, so Mrs. H3 sold her land to Mrs. H2 for 06 maces of gold. In 1994, Mrs. H2 applied for a certificate of land use right, inclusive of her land, so she complained to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Committee of Ward 4, City T. When Mrs. H2 promised to make a will to adjust it, she withdrew trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay complaint. Mrs. H2 died before she could transfer ownership of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land to her, while trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay will in question states that all trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land is left to Mrs. T. In 2007, she was sponsored by Mrs. H3 to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay US, so she authorized her son, Mr. K, to take care of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house and land mentioned above. Therefore, she did not agree with Ms. T's lawsuit petition because Mr. G sold trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land to Ms. Xuan M1; Mrs. G gave her land to live in, not a free shelter on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land of Mrs. H2 and Mrs. T; she does not reside in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay US, currently she still holds Vietnamese nationality and household registration in Vietnam and will return to Vietnam in December 2019; it is reasonable that she authorizes her children to stay here while she is away.

In trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first instance civil judgment No. 06/2018/DSST dated August 9, 2018, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People’s Court of Province T held that:

Pursuant to Article 228; Point a, Clause 5, Article 477 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayCivil Procedure Code in Viet Nam; Article 166 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay 2015trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay; Article 105 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayLand Law 2003 in Viet Nam; Article 203 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayLand Law 2013 in Viet Nam; Clause 2, Article 27 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nayOrdinance on Court fees and charges in Viet Nam;

Accepting trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay petition of Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T against Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K about trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay "Civil dispute over trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay return of land use right"; forcing Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K, Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1 and their children, including Tran Nguyen Le V, Tran Nguyen Thao V1, Tran Nguyen Anh D1 to hand over to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Thu T trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right with an area of ​​110.2 m2 in land plot No. 286, map sheet No. 15 belonging to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay certificate of land use right No. CH 00348 issued by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Committee of Town T (now City T) dated December 10, 2010 to Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T (with attached diagram).

Ms. T is entitled to own a house of grade 4C on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land, with a corrugated iron roof, no ceiling, partitions to build walls, walls on both sides are borrowed walls, ceramic tile floor, iron doors; Ms. T is obliged to pay Ms. Le Thi Hue D trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of VND 22,109,109 (twenty-two million, one hundred and nine thousand, one hundred and nine dong).

It is noted that Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T voluntarily supported trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay relocation costs for Mr. K and Ms. H1 with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay amount of VND 100,000,000 (One hundred million VND).

Mr. K, Ms. H1, Le V, Thao V1, and Mr. D1 are entitled to stay for a period of 04 (four) months from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay judgment takes legal effect.

In addition, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment also decides first-instance civil court costs; other procedural costs; liability for delayed judgment enforcement; trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay obligation to enforce trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay judgment and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay right to appeal according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay provisions of law.

On August 16, 2018, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1 filed a co-appeal requesting trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Court of Appeal to change trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment; refusing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay lawsuit petition on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay grounds that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay supplement to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Mr. G's will states that Mrs. D is also allowed to build a house and is prohibited from selling it; Mrs. D has authorized Mr. K to take care of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house and in coming time, Mrs. D will return to live and Mrs. D will not sell it to anyone, so Ms. T is not entitled to reclaim trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land.

On November 27, 2018, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K filed with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance court an appeal dated October 2, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay person with related interests and obligations, Ms. Le Thi Hue D (bearing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay consular authorization No. 2536 dated October 23, 2018) requesting trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay dismissal of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay lawsuit petition filed by Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T.

In trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Appeal Decision No. 13/2018/KNPT-DS dated August 23, 2018, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Chief Procurator of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Procuracy of province T proposed trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Court of Appeal to reverse trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment and remand trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case file to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court of first instance to re-try trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case because it was inappropriate to force Mr. K and his wife and children to return trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land use right; and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court’s failure take evidence to fully bring relevant persons in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay proceedings is a serious procedural error; and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court’s failure to impose Mrs. D's obligations will make trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay judgment enforcement difficult; and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay judgment also lacked trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay procurator's opinion as required in Form No. 52 issued together withNghị quyết 01/2017/NQ-HĐTP biểu mẫu trong tốdated January 13, 2017 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Supreme People's Court.

At today’s appellate court hearing:

Mr. Nguyen Van T1 sustains trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay appeal of Ms. Le Thi Hue D, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1, proposing to modify trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment, rejecting trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay petitioner's entire claim and recognizing trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay area of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land in question for Ms. Le Thi Hue D. During trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance trial, Mrs. D and Mr. K did not file a counterclaim and did not carry out counterclaim procedures requesting recognition of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay disputed land area for Ms. Le Thi Hue D.

Ms. Le Thi Hue D proposes to turn down trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay petitioner's lawsuit petition.

Mr. Nguyen Thanh H proposes to reject trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay appeal of Mr. K, Ms. H1, Mrs. D and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Chief Procurator of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Procuracy of Province T, upholding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay representative of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Procuracy states that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay proceeding participants strictly have complied with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay civil procedure law; and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay appeal is valid. Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay content, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment’s acceptance of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay petitioner's lawsuit petition is an error. However, because trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment was wrong when determining that Mr. K was trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay respondent instead of Ms. D. From trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay wrong identification of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay participant in proceedings, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment forced Mr. K and Ms. H1 to return trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land without forcing Mrs. D to return trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land which leads trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay judgment unenforceable. So it is recommended to reverse trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment and remand trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case file to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance court for re-trial of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay case.

JUDGEMENT OF trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay COURT

Pursuant to documents and evidences examined at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court hearing, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay results of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay adversarial process at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court hearing; trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel judges as follows:

[1] trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay appeal of Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K, Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1 and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Chief Procurator of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Procuracy of province T were made in proper form and within trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay statutory period. So these are eligible for settlement according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay appellate procedures.

Ms. Le Thi Hue D did not appear in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance court hearing, so Ms. Le Thi Hue D's appeal dated October 2, 2018 is still within trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay statutory period specified in Clause 3, Article 479 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Civil Procedure Code, and is fully qualified for settlement according to appellate procedures.

By trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance trial, Tran Nguyen Le V was an adult who is entitled to participate in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay proceedings himself/herself and Tran Nguyen Le V also did not have a written authorization, but trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment determined that Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K, Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1 are natural representatives of Tran Nguyen Le V. That was not correct. However, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay legitimate rights and interests of Tran Nguyen Le V do not conflict with trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay legitimate rights and interests of Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1, so this error did not affect trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay rights and obligations of Tran Nguyen Le V, so it is not necessary to reverse trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment.

Ms. Le Thi Hue D is trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay true owner of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house located on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land in dispute, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court should have instructed trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay petitioner to amend and supplement trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay petition to determine Ms. D as trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay respondent, but trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment determined Mr. K as trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay respondent. That was incorrect. However, Mrs. D has no complaints about this and Mrs. D is still allowed to participate in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay proceedings, so Ms. D's procedural rights and obligations are still respected, so it should stop as a lesson learned for trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court of first instance.

trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment did not state trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay procurator's opinion in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment as required in a judgment form. But this error does not affect trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay legitimate interests of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay involved parties, so it is not necessary to reverse trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment.

[2] trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay litigants all acknowledge that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land area in dispute originates from Mrs. Nguyen Thi G. On July 13, 1983, Mrs. Nguyen Thi G made a will, leaving trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay entire house and land to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim H2, but at trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same time, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay supplement to this Will also shows that Mrs. G agreed to let Ms. Le Thi Hue D build a house on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land with a condition not to transfer it to other people, and then Mrs. D built trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house thereon. Until 2007, Ms. D authorized her son, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K, to take care of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house for her to leave trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay country.

In 1985, Mr. G died. In 2002, Mr. H2 was granted a land use right certificate No. 02895 with an area of ​​1,722 m2. After Mr. H2 died, Mrs. T inherited trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land and was granted a land use right certificate No. CH 00348 dated December 10, 2010, plot No. 286, map sheet No. 15, area 1,722 m2, located in Neighborhood 4, Ward 4, City T, Province T.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay existing condition of land use map No. 11/TDMN-2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Southern Geodetic and Mapping Company Limited, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Land Registration Office of Province T, City T branch which was signed on May 9, 2018, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay disputed land with an area of ​​​​110.2 m2 belongs to a part of land plot No. 286, map sheet No. 15 located in Neighborhood 4, Ward IV, town (now city) T, province T by Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T who was granted a certificate of land use right No. BD 901226, register No. CH 00348 dated December 10, 2010. On trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land, there is a class-4C house of Ms. Le Thi Hue D, which was built according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay will of Mrs. Nguyen Thi G. In 2007, Ms. D authorized her son, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K, to take care of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house for Mrs. D to leave trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay country.

[3] Ms. Le Thi Hue D is an overseas Vietnamese who is allowed to enter Vietnam, so according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay provisions of Clause 1, Article 8 ofvtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Nhà ở 2014 Số hiệu 65/2014/QH13 -, Ms. Le Thi Hue D is eligible for owning a house in Vietnam.

Ms. Le Thi Hue D's house still exists on trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay disputed land area of ​​110.2 m 2 in part of land plot No. 286. Ms. Le Thi Hue D does not transfer trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay ownership of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house to another person, but she assigned it her biological son, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K, with his wife and son K, to take care and use trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house during Mrs. Le Thi Hue D's departure. That is, Ms. Le Thi Hue D is still exercising trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay rights of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay home owner by assigning her children to manage and use trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house. Therefore, Ms. Le Thi Hue D is still trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay owner of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and his wife and children are only custodians and occupants of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay house, not trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay owner. So, Ms. Le Thi Hue D does not breach trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay condition stated in trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay supplement to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay will dated July 13, 1983 of Mrs. Nguyen Thi G. At trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay same time, Mrs. D returned to Vietnam to live here. Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay representative of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Procuracy holds that trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay refusal of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay petition of Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T about reclaiming trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay land is grounded, so this opinion should be accepted. Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Trial Panel accepts trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay appeal of Ms. Le Thi Hue D, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1, to change trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance judgment and reject trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay petition of Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T.

[4] Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay cost of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay proceedings, it is re-determined as follows:  Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T has to bear trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay entire measurement cost of 15,000,000 VND and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay cost of judicial assistance abroad of 150,000 VND.

5] trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance civil court fee is re-defined as follows:  Nguyen Thi Thu T must bear trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance civil court fee unrelated to monetary claim. Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K does not have to bear trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance civil court fee.

[6] Ms. Le Thi Hue D, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1 are not subject to appellate civil court fee.

For trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay foregoing reasons,

DISPOSITION

1. Pursuant to clause 2 Article 308 and Article 309 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Criminal Procedure Code 2015; Article 48 of Resolution No. 326/2016/UBTVQH14 dated December 30, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay National Assembly Standing Committee, stipulating trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court fees and charges, collection, exemption, reduction, management, and use thereof: Article 30 of Ordinance on Court Fees and Charges;

2. Accept trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay entire appeal of Ms. Le Thi Hue D, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1, accept partial appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Chief Procurator of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Provincial People's Procuracy T. Modify trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance civil judgment No. 06/2018/DSST dated August 9, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay People's Court of province T as follows:

2.1. Reject trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay petition of Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T asking Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1 to relocate Ms. Le Thi Hue D's house to return to Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T an area of ​​110.2. m2 which belongs to a part of land plot No. 286, map sheet No. 15 located in Neighborhood 4, Ward IV, City T, province T (according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay existing condition land use map No. 11/TDMN-2018 of Southern Geodetic and Mapping Company Limited, signed by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Land Registration Office of Province T, City Branch of T on May 9, 2018).

2.2. Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay cost of proceedings:

Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T has to bear trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay entire measurement cost of 15,000,000 VND (Fifteen million VND) and trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay cost of judicial assistance abroad of 150,000 VND (One hundred and fifty thousand VND). These costs have been paid by Mrs. Nguyen Thi Thu T, so she does not have to pay more.

2.3. Regarding first instance civil court fee:

- Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu T must pay trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay first-instance civil court fee unrelated to monetary claim of 200,000 VND (Two hundred thousand VND) which is deducted from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay paid court fee advance 200,000 VND (Two hundred thousand VND) according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay receipt No. 0003064 dated 22/7/2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Sub-Department of civil judgment enforcement of City T, Province T, so no additional payment is required.

Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1 are not subject to first instance civil court fee.

3. Regarding appellate civil fee: Ms. Le Thi Hue D, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K and Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1 are not subject to appellate civil court fee.

Reimburse Ms. Le Thi Hue D, Mr. Tran Thai Thuy K, Ms. Nguyen Le Thi H1 trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay court fee advance of 300,000 VND (Three hundred thousand VND)/person according to trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay receipts No. 0000741 dated November 28, 2018; No. 0000652 dated August 23, 2018; No. 0000840 dated February 28, 2019 made by trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay Department of Civil judgment enforcement of Province T.

4. trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay judgment takes legal effect from trực tiếp bóng đá việt nam hôm nay date of pronouncement./