vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayJudgment no. 528/2018/DS-ST dated november 6, 2018 on claim for property

vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay PEOPLE’S COURT OF TAN PHU DISTRICT OF HO CHI MINH CITY

JUDGMENT NO. 528/2018/DS-ST DATED NOVEMBER 6, 2018 ON CLAIM FOR PROPERTY

On November 1 and 6, 2018, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance trial court was conducted at vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay office of People’s Court of Tan Phu District to hear vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay civil case No. 317/2017/TLST-DS dated October 5, 2017 regarding claim for property according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Decision to Bring vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Case to Trial No.276/2018/QDXXST-DS dated October 10, 2018 between vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay following litigants:

Petitioner:  Mrs. Le Thi Lan, born in 1976; address: 539/23 Luy Ban Bich, Phu Thanh Ward, Tan Phu District, Ho Chi Minh City.

Authorized representative of Mrs. Lan: Mr. Nguyen Minh Hien, born in 1988; residing in: 27-29 T3 Ky Con, Nguyen Thai Binh Ward, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City (present)

Protector of legitimate rights and interests of Mrs. Le Thi Lan: Mr. Tran Van Hop -  Lawyer of Sai Gon Tre Lawyer’s Office, a member of Bar Association of Ho Chi Minh City. (present).

Respondent:  Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien, born in 1973; address: 40A Street 29, Ward 6, Go Vap District, Ho Chi Minh City.

Authorized representative of Mrs. Lien: Mr. Cao Thanh Tuyen, born in 1960; residing in: 563/25 Nguyen Dinh Chieu, Ward 2, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City. (Letter of Authorization No. 010456, volume No. 01 TP/CC-SCC/HDGD dated September 1, 2017) (present)

Person with relevant rights and obligations: (absent)

Mrs. Duong Thi Bach Phuong - born in 1968

Address: 416 Le Duc Tho, Ward 6, Go Vap District

Mr. Le Thanh Qui - born in 1984

Address: 43/16/10 Do Thua Luong, Tan Quy Ward, Tan Phu District.

vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay CASE

Representation of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit petition dated September 26, 2017 and depositions during vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case settlement of Mr. Cao Thanh Tuyen, representative of Mrs. Lien:

In late 2015, wishing to buy a house for her child, Mrs. Le Thi Lan agreed with Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house No. 10 Hard Catstle Avenue, Landsdale 6065 WA Perth Australia for AUD 700,000, equivalent to VND 11 billion, Vietnamese currency applied to money transfer and advance deposit is VND 2 billion.

At that time, Mrs. Lan was abroad so her younger brother Mr. Qui gave VND 2 billion of advance deposit to Mrs. Duong Thi Bach Phuong - a friend who Mrs. Lien asked to receive vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay advance deposit. On December 11, 2015, Mrs. Phuong and Mr. Qui made a note of deposit receipt. Mrs. Phuong forwarded all this sum of money to Mrs. Lien. Mrs. Lien and Mrs. Lan engaged in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sale of above house without any deposit contract or house purchase contract, only with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay said notice of deposit receipt.

Mrs. Lien constantly urged Mrs. Lan to complete vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house transfer paperwork, but until now, Mrs. Lan still has not completed so Mrs. Lien initiates a lawsuit on a dispute on house deposit contract.

Now that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay two parties do not continue to perform vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house purchase contract, Mrs. Lien agrees to return Mrs. Lan VND 2 billion.  However, because she did not have money to pay immediately, Mrs. Lien offered to sell vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in Australia and get to repay Mrs. Lan immediately

Mrs. Lan's claim for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay repayment of VND 110,500,000 which was transferred to Mrs. Lien as vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount Mrs. Lan asked Mrs. Lien to buy a car for Mrs. Lan’s son in Australia.  Mrs. Lien confirmed that she received this sum of money. Mrs. Lien agreed to repay Mrs. Lan VND 110,500,000 but because she did not have money to pay immediately, Mrs. Lien offered to sell vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in Australia and get money to repay Mrs. Lan immediately.

Representation in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay counterclaim dated July 30, 2018 and depositions during vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case settlement of Mr. Nguyen Minh Hien, representative of Mrs. Lan:

Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien and Mrs. Le Thi Lan are previously acquainted with each other. From 2014, Mrs. Lien persuaded Mrs. Lan to send her child to Australia to study abroad under vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sponsorship of Mrs. Lien, all costs of living and studying would be covered by periodical sum of money sent by Mrs. Lan. After Mrs. Lien's child studying in Australia for a while, Mrs. Lien proposed Mrs. Lan to engage into a fake marriage and complete vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay marriage paperwork to be eligible for legal residency and have good conditions to take care of her child. In addition, Mrs. Lien also recommended Mrs. Lan to buy a house in Australia to qualify for immigration under Australian law, and buy a car for her child to prove her financial situation in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay host country.

On December 11, 2015, Mrs. Lien asked Mrs. Lan to give Mrs. Duong Thi Bach Phuong VND 2 billion, as orally agreed by them to complete vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay fake marriage paperwork for Mrs. Lan.

At this time, Mrs. Lan was not present in Vietnam, so she asked her younger brother named Qui to give Phuong VND 2 billion. In order to confirm vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt of money, Mrs. Phuong took a note with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content “receiving deposit for house purchase”. In fact, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay two parties did not have any deposit contract or house purchase contract in Australia and Mrs. Lan did not have a need to buy a house in Australia. On vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay other hand, Mrs. Lien does not have vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to own or right to use vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in question under Australian law.  Information about vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house is unidentified.

In addition, Mrs. Lien also asked Mrs. Lan to transfer a sum of money to buy a car for Mrs. Lan's child, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transferred amount was VND 110,500,000.  So far, Mrs. Lien still does not buy a car and does not return vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay money to Mrs. Lan (enclosed with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay payment slip dated September 8, 2015 at ACB Bank, amount of VND 110,500,000)

As for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit request of Mrs. Lien, Mrs. Lan has vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay following opinions:

+ Force Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien to pay Mrs. Le Thi Lan VND 2 billion according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt dated December 11, 2015 and VND 110,500,000 transferred to buy a car in Australia. Total: VND 2,110,500,000. Such amount of money must be paid in lump sum no later than vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay effective date of this Judgment.

Person with relevant rights and obligations:

Representation of Mrs. Duong Thi Bach Phuong:  She and Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien have knew each other before.  Mrs. Lan agreed to buy Mrs. Lien's house in Australia to enable Lan's child to go to school more conveniently.  At that time, Mrs. Lan was not in Vietnam, so she asked Mr. Qui (Lan's younger brother) to give Mrs. Phuong VND 2,000,000,000 deposit on Mrs. Lien’s house in Australia.  When she received this money, she gave it all to Mrs. Lien.  Now vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit between Mrs. Lien and Mrs. Lan is not related to her, so she asks to be absent from all court sessions.

Representation of Mr. Le Van Qui: at vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay time of Mrs. Le Thi Lan was abroad, she asked him to give Mrs. Duong Thi Bach Phuong VND 2,000,000,000.  After receiving vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay full amount of VND 2,000,000,000, Mrs. Phuong took a note of receipt dated December 11, 2015. He was only asked by Mrs. Lan to hand over vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay money so he did not know vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purpose of money transfer and did not care about vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contents of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt, he only knew that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay actual amount of transfer was 2 billion.  Due to busy work, he asked to be absent from all court sessions.

At today's trial:

Mrs. Lien's representative withdrew all lawsuit requests and other requests, agreed to return vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 2,000,000,000 which Mrs. Lien deposited to buy vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 110,500,000 that Mrs. Lan had paid to Mrs. Lien's account but Mrs. Lien offered to sell vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in Australia and get money to pay Mrs. Lan immediately.

Mrs. Lan's representative still maintained vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above opinion, claiming that there was no purchase of house between vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay two parties. Requesting Mrs. Lien to pay immediately vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 2,000,000,000 and VND 110,500,000.  Totaling VND 2,110,500,000, repayment no later than December 15, 2018.

Representation of protector of legitimate rights and interests of Mrs. Le Thi Lan: Since Mrs. Lien withdrew all vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay lawsuit requests, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay protector proposes vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel to consider changing vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay positions of litigants in accordance with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.  Mrs. Lien and Mrs. Lan do not have a deposit contract to sell house, there is no information about vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house, no payment method for selling house and does not meet vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay format of a deposit contract or house purchase contract, it is recommended for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel to accept all of Mrs. Lan's request because Mrs. Lan's request is in accordance with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.

* Representative of Tan Phu District People's Procuracy participated in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial express opinions as follows:

+ Regarding proceedings:  During vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case settlement, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Judge, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel, and procedural participants have complied with regulations of law on procedures from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay acceptance of case time until vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay deliberation time as per vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.

+ With reference to content: Accept vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request of Mrs. Le Thi Lan.  Force Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien to pay Mrs. Le Thi Lan vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 2,000,000,000 (according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt dated December 11, 2015) and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 110,500,000 (according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay payment slip dated September 8, 2015 at ACB Bank) no later than December 15, 2018.

JUDGEMENT OF vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay COURT

After studying vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay documents in vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file that were verified at vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial and based on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay results of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay arguments at vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial, after hearing vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay opinions of representative of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Procuracy of Tan Phu District, after deliberating, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel judges:

1. With reference to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay proceedings:  Considering vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petition of Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien and petition for counterclaim of Mrs. Le Thi Lan.  vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel finds that:

+ Mrs. Lien's representative said that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 2,000,000,000 that Mrs. Lien had received from Mrs. Lan was vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay deposit on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in Australia according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt dated December 11, 2015, showing vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer of house deposit to Mrs. Lien.  vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel finds that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay transfer of deposit on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house does not specify house’s address, location, payment period and method, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant also does not confirm vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay purchase of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in Australia. So, there are no valid grounds for determining that this is a deposit contract to buy vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house at 10 Hard Catstle Avenue, Landsdale 6065 WA Perth Australia in Australia.

+ vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant’s representative said that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 2,000,000,000 was given to Mrs. Lien to complete fake marriage paperwork for Mrs. Lan to settle in Australia.  vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel shall base on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay notice of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay results of settling vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay source of information on crime No. 987 / TB-ANDT-D9 on May 18, 2018 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Public Security of.  Ho Chi Minh City, which express that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay documents provided by Lan are not grounded enough to prove that vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay act of "Obtaining property by fraud and organizing others to flee abroad illegally"

From vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above judgments, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel determines that this is a case of "claim for property" under vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of Clause 3, Article 26 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay 2015 Civil Procedure Code and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case under vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay jurisdiction of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court in Tan Phu District, Ho Chi Minh City as prescribed in Article 39 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code 2015.

At today's trial, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner’s representative withdraws all lawsuit requests so vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay protector of legitimate rights and interests of Mrs. regarding vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay change positions of litigants is accordant with Article 245 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Code of Law Civil litigation and it should be accepted. Mrs. Nguyen Thi Lan is vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner; Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien is vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant;

Regarding vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial of absentia:  Mrs. Duong Thi Bach Phuong and Mr. Nguyen Thanh Qui asked for absence.  vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel shall decide to adjudicate without vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay litigants in accordance with vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay provisions of Clause 2 of Article 227; Article 228 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code.

2. About vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay requests of litigants:

Representatives of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay petitioner and defendant agree on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay VND 2,000,000,000 transferred according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt dated December 11, 2015 and VND 110,500,000 according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay payment slip dated September 8, 2015 at ACB Bank and Mrs. Lien agrees to pay this amount to Mrs. Lan, so vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel recognizes it.

Payment deadline:

Mrs. Lan’s representative denied Mrs. Lien's representative request that Mrs. Lien will pay Mrs. Lan when she may sell vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay house in Australia, so vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel had no basis to consider.  Mrs. Lan's representative request vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay payment no later than December 15, 2018, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel considers that this request is grounded to accept.

First instance civil court fee: Pursuant to Article 147 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Procedure Code; pursuant to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Resolution No. 326/2016/UBTVQH14 dated December 30, 2016 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Standing Committee of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly.  Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien has to pay a court fee of VND 74,210,000, deducted from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paid advance payment of court fee according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt slip No. 0009852 dated October 5, 2017 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Judgment Enforcement Sub-Department of Tan Phu District.  Mrs. Lien has to pay an additional fee of VND 73,910,000

Refund all court fee advances to Mrs. Le Thi Lan

Based on vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay above-mentioned facts and matters,

HEREBY DECIDES

- Pursuant to Article 26, Article 39, Article 245, Article 227, Article 228 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayCivil Procedure Code;

- Pursuant to Article 116, Article 131, Article 166 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayCivil Code 2015;

- Pursuant to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayNghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quydated December 30, 2016 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly Standing Committee.

Hereby judges:

1 / Suspension of all lawsuit requests of Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien.

Accept vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay independent request of Mrs. Le Thi Lan.

- Force Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien to pay Mrs. Le Thi Lan vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 2,110,500,000 (including VND 2,000,000,000 according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt dated December 11, 2015 and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount of VND 110,500,000 according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay payment slip dated September 8, 2015 at ACB Bank).

Term and method of payment:  Lump sum payment, no later than December 15, 2018.

2/ First instance civil court fee: Mrs. Phan Thi Kim Lien has to pay a court fee of VND 74,210,000, deducted from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paid advance payment of court fee Mrs. Lien according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt slip No. 0009852 dated October 5, 2017 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Judgment Enforcement Sub-Department of Tan Phu District.  Mrs. Lien has to pay an additional fee of VND 73,910,000

Refund all advance payment of VND 37,105,000 to Mrs. Le Thi Lan according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay receipt slip No. 0011745 dated August 28, 2018 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Judgment Enforcement Sub-department of Tan Phu District.

Enforce at vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay competent civil judgment enforcement agency.

3- With reference to right to appeal: Litigants may rightfully appeal this Judgment within 15 days from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment announcement. vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay parties who are absent may appeal vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Judgment within 15 days from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date on which vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Judgment is received or posted up.

4/ Regarding vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay rights and obligations of judgment enforcement:

From vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay effective date of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Judgment (for cases where vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment enforcement agency has vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to take initiative in issuing a judgment enforcement decision) or from vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date on which vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay request for judgment enforcement made by judgment creditor is received (for vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amounts payable to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment creditor) until vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment enforcement is completed, all vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay monthly sums of money to be paid by vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment debtor shall incur interest of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay money amounts still payable according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay enforcement decision according to vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay interest rates stipulated in Clause 2 Article 468 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code 2015.

In case vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment or court decision is enforced as per regulations in Article 2 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nayLaw on Enforcements of Civil Judgments, vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay judgment creditor and judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 6, 7, 9 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on enforcement of civil judgments, and vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay effective period of judgment enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 of vtv5 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Law on Enforcement of Civil Judgments.