Judgment No. 727/2020/HNGD-ST dated june 29, 2020 on dispute over child custody trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cohabiting couple

THE PEOPLE’S COURT trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro BINH THANH DISTRICT, HO CHI MINH CITY

JUDGMENT NO. 727/2020/HNGD-ST DATED JUNE 29, 2020 ON DISPUTE OVER CHILD CUSTODY trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro COHABITING COUPLE

On June 22 and 29, 2020, at the headquarters trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the People's Court trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City, a public first-instance trial is conducted according to the normal procedures trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the case No. 2336/2019/TLST-HNGD dated December 13, 2019 on "Dispute over child custody trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro cohabiting couple" according to the Decision to Bring the Case to Trial No. 97/2020/QDXXST-HNGD dated May 21, 2020, among the involved parties:

1. Plaintiff:Mr.G.J.D.E., born in 1972, Address: City Garden, 59 Ngo Tat To, Ward 21, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City.

2. Respondent:Mrs. T.T.K.D., born in 1991, Address: City Garden, 59 Ngo Tat To, Ward 21, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City.

3. Interpreter:Mrs.H.T.B.D., born in 1967, Address: AA Street 2, Phuoc Thien Quarter, Long Binh Ward, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

* Representation trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the plaintiff, Mr. G.J.D.E., interpreted by Ms. H.T.B.D.:

The plaintiff wants to be the person who directly cares, nurtures and educates L.A.T.E. (the kid) in the present and in the future in the best way.  Currently, the child is suffering from psychological trauma, certified by a psychologist from Learning Strategies, at 70 Nguyen Cu Street, Thao Dien Ward, District 2, Ho Chi Minh City.  Earlier, the kid did not have symptoms trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro this disease until he witnessed his mother's violent acts.  In the letter sent by the psychologist, it was clearly stated that the kid should avoid acts trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro violence and aggression between the father and the mother.

For the care trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro L.A.T.E., the plaintiff has a maid, a driver and he also spends time on taking care trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the kid every day including:  chatting, reading, having dinner and helping the kid sleep every day.  The plaintiff has been taking care trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro L.A.T.E. from the time he was born so far, even when he was on a business trip abroad, he also took the baby with him.  During the cohabitation time, the defendant has repeatedly run away from home for many days and he was the one who directly took care trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the L.A.T.E. in that time.

He is the General Director in charge trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro seven different countries, so he has the right to decide whether or not to go on business because his work is mainly done on computers, each time he goes on business, he has staff to take care trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the kid. On average, he goes on business trips once or twice a month, 2 to 3 days per trip. So, in order to ensure the best interests trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the child, the plaintiff asks the Court to award him primary physical custody and give the kid’s mother rights trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro visitation.

* Representation trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Mrs. T.T.K.D:

In the voluntary statement dated February 21, 2020, Mrs. T.T.K.D. admitted she got into a courtship with Mr. G.J.D.E. in 2015 for a while, and then they had baby L.A.T.E. in later 2016. Since Mr. G.J.D.E. has an official wife and 03 daughters in Singapore and they have not been divorced, so Mr. G.J.D.E. and she cannot get a marriage certificate.  During their cohabitation time, they have got many conflicts and their relationship has irretrievably broken down, so she decided to leave and wanted the baby L.A.T.E. be at peace and will not witness the quarrel trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro parents anymore.  She agreed to let Mr. G.J.D.E. raise the kid with conditions: On Wednesday, she can pick up the kid to the draw class from 16:00 to 19:00; From 8:00 p.m. on Saturday to 7:00 p.m. on Sunday, the kid may stay with her and only two trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro them spend time together, not in the presence trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Mr. G.J.D.E. as well as the driver or the maid; Request the Court to allow her to take her child to visit her family in Da Lat and take the secondary custody trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro L.A.T.E .; she wants Mr. G.J.D.E. let her know when the baby is sick or only bring the baby abroad with her prior consent; she wants to be the one who takes care trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro L.A.T.E. when Mr. G.J.D.E. goes aboard.

In the record trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro reconciliation dated March 5, 2020, Mrs. T.T.K.D. changes her opinions as follows:  She opposes the plaintiff's petition. She wants the primary custody trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the child because she wants to bring the best to L.A.T.E.  Since the kid’s birth to his three years trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro age, she has physically taken care trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the kid from eating, bathing and other stuff, the maid only helps a bit. Because the child is a girl and she is the one who understands and takes care trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the child best, it is the best and most convenient to let her take care trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the child physically. For work, the plaintiff goes on business a lot, so it is not good to bring the child with him or leave the child with the maid.

In the statement dated May 17, 2020 sent to the Court by postal service on May 19, 2020 and June 12, 2020, Ms. T.T.K.D. agreed to cede the right to bring up L.A.T.E. to Mr. G.J.D.E. because Mrs. T.T.K.D will no longer reside in Ho Chi Minh City for the job transfer, with the following conditions: Every Wednesday afternoon at 5:00 pm, he must let her meet and talk to L.A.T.E. via video call; Let L.A.T.E. celebrate Lunar New Year - Vietnamese traditional New Year in her hometown in two weeks if L.A.T.E. is not busy with class schedules; let L.A.T.E. meet her in two weeks during the summer break; when L.A.T.E. spends time with her, request Mr. G.J.D.E. not to be present, but just the time between two trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro them; every time she visits L.A.T.E., she will send an email in advance to Mr. G.J.D.E. from one to two weeks so as not to affect Mr. G.J.D.E.'s physical and primary child custody, request Mr. G.J.D.E. not to make it difficult and to enable her to be close to, indirectly teach and love her child.

* Opinion trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the representative trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the People's Procuracy trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City:

The plaintiff, Mr. G.J.D.E. sued the defendant, Ms. T.T.K.D., residing in Binh Thanh District over a child custody dispute, and Mr. G.J.D.E. and Ms. T.T.K.D. have cohabited as husband and wife without marriage registration, so it is right when the People's Court trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Binh Thanh District accepted and handled it under its jurisdiction. Since the acceptance to the trial today, the Judge, People's Jurors, and Court Clerk have complied with the provisions trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro law.  The involved parties received the court’s papers to exercise their rights and perform their obligations in accordance with the civil procedure law.  Regarding the content, the Procuracy proposes the Trial Panel to consider accepting the petition trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the plaintiff:  Grant the physical custody trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro L.A.T.E., born on September 18, 2016 to Mr. G.J.D.E.; the defendant must bear the court fee as provided for by law.

JUDGEMENT trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro THE COURT

After considering the documents contained in the case files which have been verified at the trial and based on the results trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the oral argument at the trial, the Trial Panel determines:

At the trial, the plaintiff, Mr. G.J.D.E. keeps the lawsuit against Mrs. T.T.K.D., applying for the physical custody trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro L.A.T.E., born on September 18, 2016, without asking Mrs. T.T.K.D. to provide child support.

[1] Regarding jurisdiction to resolve the case:

According to the affirmation trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the involved parties, Mr. G.J.D.E. and Mrs. T.T.K.D. have cohabited as husband and wife since 2015 but did not register their marriage and had a child named L.A.T.E., born on September 18, 2016, so there is no legal marriage between Mr. G.J.D.E. and Mrs. T.T.K.D., the Court resolves the dispute over child custody when there is a petition for lawsuit. Consider Mr. G.J.D.E. suing Mrs. T.T.K.D, whose address is located at Ward 21, Binh Thanh District, seeking the physical custody trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro L.A.T.E.  Pursuant to clause 7 Article 28, point b clause 1 Article 35, clause 1 Article 39 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the Civil Procedure Code, it is determined that this is a marriage and family dispute under the jurisdiction trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the People's Court trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City.

[2] Regarding the absence trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the defendant, Mrs. T.T.K.D .:

Considering the defendant’s request for trial in absentia dated May 17, 2020 because trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro her job transfer and her statement dated May 17, 2020, according to Clause 1 Article 228 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the Civil Procedure Code, the Court finds just cause to hear the case in her absence.

[3] Regarding the lawsuit petition trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the plaintiff:

According to the documents in the case file and the affirmation trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the involved parties, L.A.T.E., born on September 18, 2016, is the common child trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Mr. G.J.D.E. and Mrs. T.T.K.D ..

According to the parties' statements in the process trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro resolving the case and the plaintiff's affirmation at the trial, L.A.T.E. is living with Mr. G.J.D.E. at City Garden, 59 Ngo Tat To, Ward 21, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City; L.A.T.E. is studying at Aurora International Preschool trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro The Arts, at 13 Tran Ngoc Dien, Thao Dien Ward, District 2, Ho Chi Minh City.

In the statement dated May 17, 2020, the defendant Mrs. T.T.K.D. admits that she no longer lives in Ho Chi Minh City because trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro job transfer, so she agrees that Mr. G.J.D.E. may take the physical custody trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro L.A.T.E., but she still has the rights trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the non-custodial parent.

Consider that L.A.T.E. has been living and studying in Ho Chi Minh City since birth until now and has been directly raised and taken care by Mr. G.J.D.E., and at the same time Mrs. T.T.K.D. no longer lives in Ho Chi Minh City due to her job change, and Mrs. T.T.K.D. agrees to give the child L.A.T.E. to Mr. G.J.D.E., the Trial Panel finds just cause to let L.A.T.E. continue to live with Mr. G.J.D.E. in Ho Chi Minh City for his life stability and normal development.

At the hearing, the plaintiff Mr. G.J.D.E. also agrees to facilitate the defendant Mrs. T.T.K.D.’s right trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro visitation, care giving and education trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the common child according to the provisions trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro law. This is suitable with request trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the defendant Mrs. T.T.K.D. In the statement dated May 17, 2020 regarding the guarantee trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the rights trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the non-custodial parent, the Trial Panel finds that: The rights trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro visitation, care giving and education trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the child trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Mrs. T.T.K.D will be respected without the interference trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Mr. G.J.D.E as prescribed in Article 82 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the Law on Marriage and Family. Therefore, the proposal trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the representative trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the People's Procuracy trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Binh Thanh District is grounded.

From the above analysis, the Trial Panel finds just cause to award trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro child physical custody to Mr. G.J.D.E.  Mrs. T.T.K.D. has the rights trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro visitation, care giving and education without any interference; in the case where Mrs. T.T.K.D. misuses this right to interfere or adversely affect Mr. G.J.D.E.’s physical custody, he or any individual or organization defined in Article 86 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the Law on Marriage and Family has the right to request the Court to restrict the defendant’s right trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro visitation trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro minor child.

Considering throughout the process trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro resolving the case and at the trial, the plaintiff Mr. G.J.D.E. is voluntary not to ask the defendant Mrs. T.T.K.D. to provide child support, in accordance with the provisions trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the law, so the Trial Panel recognizes this voluntariness trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the plaintiff.

[4] Regarding first instance civil fee:

Pursuant to Clause 1, Article 147 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the Civil Procedure Code and Clause 1, Article 26 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Resolution No. 326/2016/UBTVQH14 dated December 30, 2016, the defendant Mrs. T.T.K.D. must bear the first instance court fee trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro VND 300,000 (Three hundred thousand dong).

Therefore,

DISPOSITION

Pursuant to Clause 7 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Article 28, Clause 1 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Article 35, Article 39, Article 63, Article 147, Article 227, Article 266, Article 271 and Article 273 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro theCivil Procedure Code in Viet Nam;

Pursuant to Articles 81, 82, 83 and 84 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro thetrực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Hôn nhân và gia;

Pursuant to theLaw on Fees and Charges No. 97/2015/QH13 in Viet Namdated November 25, 2015; theNghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quy định về mứcdated December 30, 2016 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the National Assembly Standing Committee, stipulating the court fees and charges, collection, exemption, reduction, management, and use thereof;

Declare:

1. Accept the petition trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Mr. G.J.D.E ..

Award Mr. G.J.D.E the physical custody trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro L.A.T.E., born on September 18, 2016.

Recognize Mr. G.J.D.E.'s voluntary consent not to ask Mrs. T.T.K.D. to provide child support.

The non-custodial parent has the rights trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro visitation, care giving and education trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the common child without any interference. In the case where Mrs. T.T.K.D. misuses this right to interfere or adversely affect Mr. G.J.D.E.’s physical custody, the custodial parent or any individual or organization defined in Article 86 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the Law on Marriage and Family has the right to request the Court to restrict the defendant’s right trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro visitation trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro minor child.

For the benefit trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the child, either party has the right to ask the Court to change the custodial parent or child support level.

2. Regarding first instance civil fee:

Mrs. T.T.K.D. has to pay the court fee trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro marriage and family case trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro VND 300,000 (Three hundred thousand dong).

Reimburse to Mr. G.J.D.E. the paid advance court fee amount trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro VND 300,000 according to the receipt No. 0017355 dated December 11, 2019 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the Civil Judgment Enforcement Department trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro Binh Thanh District.

3. Regarding the right to request judgment enforcement:

In case the judgment or court decision is enforced as per regulations in Article 2 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro theLaw on enforcements trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro civil judgments in Viet Nam, the judgment creditor and judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 6, 7 and 9 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the Law on enforcement trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro civil judgments, and the effective period trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro judgment enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro the Law on enforcement trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro civil judgments.

4. With reference to right to appeal:

The litigants are entitled to appeal this judgment within 15 days from the date trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay euro pronouncement. For the absent involved party, the time limit for the appeal is counted from the date on which the judgment is duly served.