xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cáiJudgment No.172/2018/DS-PT dated June 29, 2018 on dispute over housing ownership

HO CHI MINH CITY SUPERIOR PEOPLE’S COURT

JUDGMENT NO.172/2018/DS-PT DATED JUNE 29, 2018 ON DISPUTE OVER HOUSING OWNERSHIP

xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appellate trial court was conducted at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Office of Ho Chi Minh City Superior People's Court on June 29, 2018 to review xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái civil case No. 150/2016/TLPT-DS dated July 15, 2016 regarding “Housing ownership dispute” according to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái protest against xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái first-instance judgment No.424/2015/DSSTdated May 08, 2015 of Ho Chi Minh City People's Court, abiding by decision on hearing a case No. 545/2016/QĐXX-PT dated October 25, 2016. Parties concerned:

- Petitioner:Mrs. Luu Kim Y (Luu Thi Kim Y)

Residing at: 1304 Corte Maltera Costa Mesa, CA 92626, USA

Authorized representative: Mrs. Le Thi Thu H (Present)

Residing at: 204/8 DVB, Ward 14, District 4, Ho Chi Minh City

Contact address: 209/21B TTT Street, Ward 3, District 4, Ho Chi Minh City

- Respondents:Mr. Le Dinh D, Mrs. Le Ngoc B

Co-residing at: 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City

Authorized representative: Mrs. Le Ngoc B; Mr. Nguyen Th (Present)

Residing at: 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City

Defender of legitimate rights and benefits of Mr. Nguyen Th: Mr. Hoang Van M – lawyer of Ho Chi Minh City Bar Association (Present)

- Persons with relevant rights and obligations:

1/- Mrs. NLQ1 (Absent);

2/- Mr. Nguyen Th (Present);

3/- Mr. NLQ3 (Absent);

4/- Mrs. NLQ4 (Absent);

5/- Mr. NLQ5 (Absent);

6/- Mrs. NLQ6 (Absent);

7/- Mrs. NLQ7 (Absent);

Co-residing at: 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City

8/- Mrs. NLQ8 (Absent);

9/- Mrs. NLQ9 (Died in 2014)

Co-residing at: 111/9 HHT, Ward 13, TB District, Ho Chi Minh City

xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái person inheriting procedure rights and duties of Mrs. NLQ9: Mrs. NLQ8 (Absent)

10/- Mrs. NLQ10 residing at 1304 Corte Maltera Costa Mesa, CA 92626, USA (Absent);

Authorized representative: Mrs. Le Thi Thu H (Present)

Residing at: 204/8 DVB, Ward 14, District 4, Ho Chi Minh City

xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái CASE OF MRS. LUU KIM Y

Pursuant to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái lawsuit complaint dated January 21, 2010 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái petitioner-Mrs. Luu Kim y (Luu Thi Kim Y) and additional statement at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court by her representative - Mrs. Le Thi Thu H: xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house and land on LVS Street, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City (previously No.534C NVT (PMG), District 3, Sai Gon) (hereinafter referred to as “xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house”) is owned by parents of Mrs. Luu Kim Y - Mr. Luu D and Mrs. NLQ10. On October 01, 1975, Mrs. Y received xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house ownership transferred from her parents according to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái agreement on transfer of ownership notarized by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Resolution People’s Committee on October 07, 1975 and she also paid xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái registration fee for house ownership at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái city tax office on October 20, 1975.  In 1980, Mrs. Y's parents suffered from severe sickness so she was permitted to accompany them to France for medical treatment purpose. As for that reason, she asked her housekeeper – Mrs. NLQ1 to look after xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house for her and transferred all house documents to Mrs. NLQ1. She still kept in touch with Mrs. NLQ1 for a period of time after leaving but then she lost contact with her. When her parents got better, she returned to Vietnam and found out that Mr. Le Dinh D and Mrs. Le Ngoc B and their family members had been living in her house. Now, her representative - Mrs.H petitions xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Court to recognize that Mr. Y has legal ownership of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house located at 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City and request Mr. D and Mrs. B and all people living in that house to return xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to Mrs. Y right after xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái judgment takes effect.

According to representation by Mr. Nguyen Th- xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái representative authorized by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái respondents - Mr. Le Dinh D and Mrs. Le Ngoc B: His parents – Mr. Le Dinh C and Mrs. NLQ4 have bought xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái housefor Mr. Le Dinh D. xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house was purchased under hand-written agreement but then such sales documents, including xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái original house documents, documents made by Mrs. NLQ1, Mrs. NLQ9 and Mrs. Nguyen Hoang Y1, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái declaration made in 1999 and annual land levy payment proof have been presented to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái People’s Committee of ward.  As xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái previous owner of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house (Mrs. Y) has gone abroad, her family members and her husband – Mr. Nguyen Th, who are people with meritorious services to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái revolution and have served for regulatory agencies but not granted any official residence, now do not accept xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái request of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái petitioner.

According to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái statement made by Mrs. Le Thi Thu H - representative of Mrs. NLQ10: Mrs. NLQ10 has given xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái houseto her daughter – Mrs. Y, so she concurs with xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái statement by Mrs. Y.

As stated by Mr. Nguyen Th: xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái previous owner of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái househas transferred xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house and original copies of house documents to Mrs. NLQ9, who died years ago. xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái residence of her family was notified to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái ward People's Committee since 1979. In 1990, Mrs. NLQ9 transferred xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái family of Mrs. Nguyen Hoang Y1 under xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái hand-written agreement; however; Mrs. Hoang Y1 still permitted Mrs. NLQ9 to use a room of area of about 30 m² on xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái third floor of such house. Then Mrs. Y transferred xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái whole fourth floor of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to Mr. Nguyen H1 who is a teacher coming from Hai Phong.  In 1933, his family found that xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house was offered for sale and its previous owner had left for overseas country and acquired a foreign nationality. For xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái purpose of giving an accommodation to his parents - Mr. Le Dinh C and Mrs.NLQ4, who are retired officials and people with meritorious services to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái revolution, Mr. D – a doctor working at Ho Chi Minh City Health Department has bought xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái price equal to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái market price and such sale has been notified to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái competent authority. His family members have served for regulatory agencies but not granted any official residence. Although his family is not xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái legal owner of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house but they have used and managed xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house for more than 30 years since such house was transferred to Mrs. NLQ9.  Pursuant to law provisions, any person managing a property for more than 30 years will be recognized as xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái legal owner of such property. Mrs. Y received xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house from her parents but she neither used nor managed xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house; moreover; she transferred xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house documents to Mrs. NLQ9. In addition, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái fact that Mrs. Y left Vietnam with her parents for France since 1975 for medical treatment purpose then going to America for work and permanently residing in America is against xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái law, so her property is supposed to be confiscated by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái State as regulated. Thus, she has no right to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house now. As for that reason, he and his family petitions for recognization of their legal ownership of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house.

His family has spent lots of money on repairing xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái shabby house and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house value defined at that moment is only 30% of its current value. And as there is no document on request for returning xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house given to his family, he does not accept Mrs. Y’s petition.

Mr. NLQ3, Mrs. NLQ4, Mr. NLQ5, Mrs. NLQ6, Mrs. NLQ7, Mrs. NLQ9 (died) and her inheritor of rights and duties for procedure – Mrs. NLQ8 (Mrs. Oanh), who have relevant rights and duties have been summoned to appear in xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court for statement making and conciliation but no one showed up.

According to first-instance civil judgment No.424/2015/DSST dated May 08, 2015 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Ho Chi Minh City People's Court:

Pursuant to Clause 2 Article 25, Article 34, 35, 131 and 245 ofxem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Code of Civil Procedure 2004 (amended in 2011) in Viet Nam, Article 164 and 169 ofxem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Civil Code 2005 in Viet Nam, Article 125 and 126 ofxem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Law on Housing 2005 in Viet Nam, Decree No.71/2010/ND-CP in Viet Namdated June 23, 2010 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Government on enforcement of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Housing Law andResolution No.01/2012/NQ-HDTP in Viet Namdated June 13, 2012 providing for guidance on implementation of a number of regulations on court fees and charges.

Hereby judges: Accept xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái lawsuit petition of Mrs. Luu Kim Y whose representative is Mrs. Le Thi Thu H

1) Accept that xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house located on LVS Street, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City (previously 534C NVT Street (PMG), cluster 4, Tran Quang Dieu ward, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City) belongs to Mrs. Luu Kim Y

2) Not accept xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái sales and transfers of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house among Mrs. NLQ9, Mrs. NLQ8 and Mrs. Nguyen Hoang Y1 under xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái agreement dated July 30, 1990 and between Mrs. NLQ9 and Mr. Le Dinh D under xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái agreement dated November 05, 1993.

3) Compel Mr. Le Dinh D and his family, who reside at 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City and Mr. Nguyen Th, and Mrs. Le Ngoc B and their family, who reside at 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City and Mrs. NLQ3, Mrs. NLQ5, Mrs. NLQ6 and Mrs. NLQ7 to return xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái entire house to Mrs. Luu Kim Y within 3 months from xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái effective date of this judgment.

4) Recognize that Mrs. Luu Kim Y is willing to give Mr. Le Dinh D and his family an assistance of VND 840 million.

xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái money and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house shall be given at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái same time under surveillance of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái enforcement body.

5) After giving xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái money to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái family of Mr. D and Mrs. B, as decided in this judgment, Mrs. Luu Kim Y is entitled to contact xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái competent authority to go through xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái paperwork for house ownership and land use rights and fulfill financial obligations as regulated by laws.

In addition, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái judgment stipulates court fees during xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái enforcement of this judgment as prescribed in Article 2, 6, 7 and 9 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Law on Judgment Enforcement and right of appeal of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái parties concerned.

On May 18, 2015, Mr. Nguyen Th, who has relevant rights and duties and is xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái authorized representative of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái respondent - Mr. Le Dinh D and Mrs. Le Ngoc B appealed against xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái whole first-instance judgment No.424/2015/DSST dated May 08, 2015 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court.

On May 21, 2015, Mrs. Le Thi Thu H, who is xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái authorized representative of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái petitioner – Mrs. Luu Kim Y appealed to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Court that xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái assistance of VND 840 million will be given only if Mr. D and Mrs. B willingly return xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái money must be given at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái same time.

At xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appellate court hearing, Mr. Nguyen Th and Mrs. Le Thi Thu H did not change their appeal; xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái parties concerned have failed to solve xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái dispute and request for settlement of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Court as per law provisions.

Mr. Nguyen Th and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái defender of his legitimate rights and benefits deem that xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái act in which Mrs. Luu Kim Y went abroad is against xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái law and she has no right to ask him to return xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house as regulated inResolution No.1037/2006/UBTVQH11 in Viet Nam.  As a result, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái first-instance judgment which recognizes that Mrs. Luu Kim Y has legal ownership of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house is not conformable to law provisions.

xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái representative of Ho Chi Minh City People's Supreme Procuracy who has analyzed all items of evidence concerned believes that xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái first-instance judgment that recognizes xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Mrs. Luu Kim Y has legal ownership of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house and does not accept xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái sales and transfers of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house among Mrs. NLQ9, Mrs. NLQ8 and Mrs. Nguyen Hoang Y1 under xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái agreement dated July 30, 1990 and between Mrs. NLQ9 and Mr. Le Dinh D under xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái agreement dated November 05, 1993 is based on legal documents.  xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái money amount of VND 840 million given to Mr. Le Dinh D and his family is recognized as xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái willing assistance offered by Mrs. Luu Kim Y according to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái first-instance judgment. Hence, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appeals of Mr. Nguyen Th and Mrs. Le Thi Thu H cannot be accepted as there is not legal base provided and they should be rejected, and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái first-instance judgment shall be upheld.

JUDGMENT OF xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái COURT

Upon consideration of all documents and evidence provided in xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái case profile which is verified at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái result of discussion at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court and recommendation of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái representative procurator, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Court finds that:

Mrs. Le Thi Thu H said that xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house originally owned by Mr. Luu D and Mrs. NLQ10 was transferred to Mrs. Luu Kim Y in 1975 and she also paid xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house ownership registration fee on July 20, 1975. By 1980, Mrs. Luu Kim Y, as permitted by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái State, accompanied Mr. Luu D and Mrs. NLQ10 to France for medical treatment purpose and transferred all original copies of house documents to her housekeeper - Mrs. NLQ1 and asked Mrs. NLQ1 to look after xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house for her. After returning to Vietnam, Mrs. Luu Kim Y found out that Mr. D and Mrs. B and their family and other people had been living in xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house. As for that reason, Mrs. Luu Kim Y filed a lawsuit to ask Mr. D and Mrs. B and other peoples who had been living in xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to return such house to her. On xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái other hand, Mr. Nguyen Th - xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái authorized representative of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái respondents - Mr. D and Mrs. B refused xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái request by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái petitioner and said that Mrs. Y had gone abroad so she had no right to ask them to return xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house.

[2] Pursuant to consistent statements provided by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái litigants and housing declaration dated December 17, 1977, Official Dispatch No.1016/QLDT-CS of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Urban Management Office affiliated to People’s Committee of District 3, Ho Chi Minh City regarding response to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Ho Chi Minh City People's Court and written response given to Mrs. Luu Kim Y on January 25, 2010 by People's Committee of District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, there are enough grounds for defining that xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house located at 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3 (previously 534C NVT, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City) is owned by Mr. Luu D and Mrs. NLQ10. And by October 1975, Mr. Du transferred such house to her daughter - Mrs. Luu Kim Y.

According to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái written response by People’s Committee of District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, there has been no State's decision on house expropriation issued so far.  Moreover, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái act in which Mr. Luu D, Mrs. NLQ10 and Mrs. Luu Kim Y went abroad is permitted by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái State, not illegal evacuation or exit.  Hence, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house mentioned above is not under xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái State's management as requested by Mr. Nguyen Th.

[3] Regarding xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái statement of Mrs. Luu Kim Y which is, when going abroad, she had Mrs. NLQ1 to look after xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house for her.  Pursuant to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái copy of house receipt document presented at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái first instance trial court by Mr. Nguyen Th on April 27, 2015, such receipt document was written by Mrs. NLQ9 on March 05, 1996 which proves that Mrs. NLQ1 is only xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house-keeper and there is no house sale or transfer between Mrs. Y and Mrs. NLQ1 as stated by Mr. Thanh.  As for that reason, there are grounds to claim that Mrs. NLQ1 is only xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái housekeeper and all house documents are transferred to Mrs. NLQ9, which is consistent to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái statement provided by Mrs. Luu Kim Y.

[4] Mr. Nguyen Th also deems that Mrs. NLQ10 transferred xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to Mrs. NLQ9, and such transfer is recorded in xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái hand-written document dated March 05, 1996. However, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appellate trial panel for civil cases finds that such document fails to prove that Mrs. NLQ10 (Mrs. Y's mother) permits Mrs. NLQ9 to own xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house.  Moreover, this document was written by Mrs. NLQ9 herself without verification of Mrs. NLQ10 and Mrs. Y. As a result, there is no ground to accept xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái statement by Mr. Nguyen Th, which claims that Mrs. NLQ10 gave xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to Mrs. NLQ9.

[5] Upon consideration of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái agreement dated July 30, 1990 (xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái copy) among Mrs. NLQ9, Mr. Pham Van Vinh. Mrs. NLQ8 and Mrs. Nguyen Hoang Y1, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái agreement dated November 05, 1993 between Mrs. NLQ9 and Mr. Le Dinh D and other agreements presented by Mr. Nguyen Th during xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appellate trial court, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái sales and transfers of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house among xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái parties were based only on hand-written agreement.   xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house was sold and transferred in presence of neither Mrs. NLQ10 nor Mrs. Y- xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái owner of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house and there was no consent to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái aforesaid agreements by Mrs. NLQ10 and Mrs. Y.  As Mrs. NLQ9 and Mrs. Nguyen Hoang Y1 have no legal ownership of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house but sold such house to Mr. D without permission of Mrs. Luu Kim Y, such sale is considered against xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái law and cannot be accepted.

[6] Mrs. Luu Kim Y went abroad in 1980 and had Mrs. NLQ1 to look after xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house for her. By 1996, Mrs. NLQ1 left for an overseas country then xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house was transferred to Mr. D and his family in 1999 by Mrs. NLQ9. As for that reason, such transfer is not considered housing transfer before July 01, 1991 and this case is about dispute over ownership of house and land for residence.

[7] Pursuant to Article 125 and 127 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Housing Law No.56/2005/QH11 dated November 29, 2005, Article 126 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Law on amendments to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Housing Law No.34/2009/QH12 of National Assembly, Article 121 ofLuật sửa đổi Điều 126 trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay(which comes into force on September 01, 2009), Article 65, 66 and 67 of Decree No.71/2010/ND-CP dated June 23, 2010 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Government providing for enforcement of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Housing Law, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái ownership of people who are living abroad and permitted to stay within such country for at least 3 months is accepted by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái State.  According to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái record of temporary residence at 215A Hoang Van Thu, Ward 8, Phu Nhuan District, Mrs. Luu Kim Y has returned to Vietnam three times and her latest return lasts from November 06, 2009 to February 06, 2010. Therefore, upon consideration of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái aforesaid information, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái act in which Mrs. Luu Kim Y petitions for recognization of her ownership of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house located 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City is based on legal documents and conformable to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái law.

[8] Regarding sales and transfers of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house among Mrs. NLQ9, Mrs. Nguyen Hoang Y1 and Mr. Le Dinh D: During xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái case settlement, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court of first instance has duly summoned xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái respondents and persons with relevant rights and duties many times but none of them showed up for evidence and statement provision or conciliation. xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court of first instance has even issued decision No.2218/QD-CCCC and duly requested them to provide evidence for consideration but they failed to comply with such request.  On xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái other hand, during xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái first trial of first instance court, Mr. Nguyen Th failed to present xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái original copy of documents on house sale and transfer among Mrs. NLQ9, Mrs. Nguyen Hoang Y1 and Mr. Le Dinh D, so xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Court of first instance must temporarily suspend xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái trial and post up an announcement of request for submission of original version of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái aforesaid documents. However, Mr. Nguyen Th still failed to provide xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái original documents as required at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái second court hearing on April 27, 2015 and he neither asked for consideration nor settlement of such documents. As for that reason, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái act in which xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court of first instance did not take such documents into account is not against xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái laws.

[9] Furthermore, as specified in Article 91 and 96 ofxem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Code of Civil Procedure 2015 in Viet Nam, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái party involved in a lawsuit must provide evidence as obliged. Hence, Mr. Nguyen Th and other parties concerned must face xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái consequence if failing to provide evidence or providing insufficient evidence.  Therefore, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Mrs. Luu Kim Y has justifiable grounds to petition for recognization of house ownership and request Mr. D and Mrs. B and their family as well as people living in xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to return such house to her as accepted by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court of first instance.  Consequently, if there is any dispute about xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house sale agreement or house transfer agreement arising among Mrs. NLQ9, Mrs. Nguyen Hoang Y1 and Mr. Le Dinh D and request for settlement of contract consequence, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái parties concerned may file another civil lawsuit.

[10] Regarding repair of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house: Mr. Nguyen Th said that he had spent totally VND 2,500 million on repairing xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house; however; he neither presented evidence for such repair nor requested for settlement during xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court hearing.

[11] As persons permanently or temporarily living at 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City failed to be present at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court and Mr. Nguyen Th failed to provide xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái evidence for xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái number of family members recorded in his family household book and information on persons temporarily living in xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court of first instance has legitimate grounds to conclude that persons living in xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house including Mr. NLQ5, Mrs. NLQ6, Mrs. NLQ7, Mrs. Le Ngoc B, Mr. Nguyen Th, Mr. Le Dinh D and Mr. NLQ3 and compel such persons to return xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to Mrs. Luu Kim Y.  Although Mr. Nguyen Th presented xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái original family household record at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái first instance trial court, he refused to provide xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái copy of such family household record as required and said that his two daughters - Nguyen Le Van and Nguyen Le Hang had gone abroad for 7 years and Mrs. Nhi- xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái wife of Mr. D was no longer living in xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house.  As for that reason, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái act in which xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court of first instance did not compel xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái aforesaid persons to return xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to Mrs. Luu Kim Y is proper. Other people who stay in such house during xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái judgment enforcement must return xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to Mrs. Luu Kim Y as obliged.

[12] Regarding xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appeal of Mrs. Le Thi Thu H, which specifies that an assistance of VND 840 million will be given only if Mr. D and Mrs. B and their family move out and return xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house to Mrs. Luu Kim Y: xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appellate trial panel for civil cases finds that Mrs. Luu Kim Y is willing to offer such assistance and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái money will be returned and received, respectively, during xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái judgment enforcement.

[13] As analyzed above, as Mr. Nguyen Th and Mrs. Le Thi Thu H fail to provide any additional document or new evidence at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appellate court, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appellate trial panel for civil cases has no ground for accepting their appeals and preserve all decisions stated in xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái first-instance judgment as recommended by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái representative procurator.

[14] As xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appeal is rejected, Mr. Nguyen Th and Mrs. Luu Kim Y must pay xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appellate court fee for civil cases as regulated.

[15] Other decisions stated in first-instance judgment No.424/2015/DSST dated May 08, 2015 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court shall remain as there is no appeal against them.

Pursuant to documents and evidence mentioned above;

HEREBY DECIDES:

Pursuant to Clause 1 Article 308, Article 27, 147, 148 and 273 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Code of Civil Procedure 2015, Article 164 and 169 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Civil Law 2005, Decree No.71/2010/ND-CP dated June 23, 2010 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Government on enforcement of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Housing Law;Nghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quy định về mứcdated December 30, 2012 providing for guidelines on court fees and charges;

Not accept xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái written appeal of Mr. Nguyen Th and Mrs. Le Thi Thu H, and uphold decisions specified in first-instance judgment No.424/2015/DSST dated May 08, 2015 of Ho Chi Minh City People's Court.

* Hereby judges: Accept xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái petition of Mrs. Luu Kim Y whose representative is Mrs. Le Thi Thu H.

1/ Recognize that xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house located on LVS Street, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City (previously 534C NVT Street NVT (PMG), cluster 4, Tran Quang Dieu ward, district 3, Ho Chi Minh City) is legally owned by Mrs. Luu Kim Y.

2/ Not accept sales and transfers of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house among Mrs. NLQ9, Mrs. NLQ8, Mrs. Nguyen Hoang Y1 under xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái agreement dated July 30, 1990 and between Mrs. NLQ9 and Mr. Le Dinh D under xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái agreement dated November 05, 1993.

3/ Compel Mr. Le Dinh D and his family, who permanently reside at 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City and Mr. Nguyen Th, Mrs. Le Ngoc B and their family, who reside at 534C LVS, Ward 14, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City and Mrs. NLQ3, Mrs. NLQ5, Mrs. NLQ6 and Mrs. NLQ7 to return xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái entire house to Mrs. Luu Kim Y within 3 months from xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái effective date of this judgment.

4/ Recognize that Mrs. Luu Kim Y is willing to give Mr. Le Dinh D and his family an assistance of VND 840 million.

xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái money and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái house shall be given at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái same time under surveillance of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái enforcement body.

5/ After giving xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái money to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái family of Mr. D and Mrs. B, Mrs. Luu Kim Y, as specified in this judgment, is entitled to contact xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái competent authority to carry out xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái procedure for house ownership and land use rights and fulfill financial obligations as regulated by laws.

6/ In terms of court fees:

Mr. Le Dinh D and Mrs. Le Ngoc B shall pay xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái first instance civil court fee of VND 200,000.

Mrs. Luu Kim Y is not required to pay xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái ad valorem civil court fee and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái money amount of VND 56 million paid in advance according to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái payment receipt No.014139 dated March 09, 2010 issued by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Ho Chi Minh City Department of enforcements of civil judgments will be refunded to her

xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appellate civil court fee of VND 200,000 shall be paid by Mr. Nguyen Th and Mrs. Luu Kim Y each; it shall be deducted from xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái court fee paid in advance by Mr. Nguyen Th and Mrs. Luu Kim Y according to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái payment receipt No.08669 and 08670 issued by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Ho Chi Minh City Department of enforcements of civil judgments.

xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái judgment debtor shall pay monthly interest for xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái lateness of court fee payment calculated based upon xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái money unpaid according to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái basic interest determined corresponding to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái time of failing to enforce xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái judgment published by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái State Bank under regulations in Clause 2 Article 305 ofxem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Civil Code in Viet Namfrom xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái day on which xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái request for judgment enforcement is issued by xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái enforcement creditor to xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái day xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái enforcement debtor fully pays all xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái money required.

In case xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái judgment or court decision is enforced as per regulations in Article 2 ofxem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Law on enforcements of civil judgments in Viet Nam, xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái judgment creditor and judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 6, 7 and 9 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Law on enforcement of civil judgments, and xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái effective period of judgment enforcement shall comply with provisions in Article 30 of xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái Law on enforcement of civil judgments

xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái judgment made at xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái appellate open court for civil case comes into force from xem bóng đá trực tiếp nhà cái day on which it is passed.