trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay PEOPLE'S COURT OF QUANG BINH PROVINCE
VERDICT NO. 32/2018/HSPT DATED APRIL 12, 2018 ON ORGANIZING OTHERS TO FLEE ABROAD
On April 12, 2018, at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay head office of People’s Court of Quang Binh Province, a court hearing is conducted to hear trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Criminal Case No. 22/2018/HS-PT dated March 6, 2018 against trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H based on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal filed by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal filed by Chief Procurator of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Procuracy of Dong Hoi City against trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Criminal Verdict No. 09/2018/HS-ST dated January 31, 2018 of People’s Court of Dong Hoi City.
Appellant: Mai Thi H, date of birth: February 3, 1984, place of birth: Ward H, City D, Quang Binh Province.Registered permanent residence: Commune T, District B, Quang Binh Province; current residence: Neighborhood 1, Ward H, City D, Quang Binh Province; occupation: freelance; education level: 5/12; ethnicity: Kinh People; gender: female; religion: none; nationality: Vietnam; father: Mr. Mai L (dead) and Mrs. Vo Thi N; husband: Mr. Nguyen Thanh T (separated) and 2 children who were born in 2004 and 2006; previous convictions: none; previous administrative violation: none; criminal record: In 2002, she left Vietnam and entered Russia Federation, then she fled to Federal Republic of Germany to do business. In late 2007, she was arrested for “Assisting illegal emigration” offence and was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months in prison. In March 2010, she was deported back to Vietnam, then she had lived in Commune T, District B, Quang Binh Province. In October 2010, she illegally entered Kingdom of England, in March 2012, she was arrested by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay England Police for “Growing marijuana illegally” and was sentenced to 1 year in prison. In March, 2013 she was deported back to Vietnam and has been out on bail based on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Ban on Leaving trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Place of Residence. Present.
Persons considered as aggrieved parties in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Verdict including Mrs. Phan Thi G, Mr. Pham Anh T, Mr. Truong Van D, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Hoai T, Mrs. Nguyen Ngoc M; and persons with relevant rights and obligations including Mr. Mai Xuan H, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Thuy D, Mr. Nguyen Dang T, Mrs. Bui Thi T, Mr. Phan Thanh B, Mr. Phan Van T, Mr. Nguyen Tien D, Mrs. Nguyen Thi N, Mr. Nguyen Anh T have not filed any appeal or not involved in any appeal made by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Procuracy, thus, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court does not summon them to appear in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court hearing.
trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay CASE
According to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay documents contained in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay progress at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay contents of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case are summarized as follows:
Mai Xuan D and Mai Thi H have lived for many years in European countries by organizing illegal emigration rings. After returning to Vietnam, Mai Xuan D asked Mai Thi H (D’s older sister) to find people who wish to work in Federal Republic of Germany. They will be sent legally to Republic of Serbia and then cross trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border illegally to Federal Republic of Germany with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay assistance of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay emigration ring of D at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cost of USD 19,000 per person.
From July 2015 to March 2016, Mai Thi H acted as a broker, directly collected money and dossiers of workers sent to Mai Xuan D in order for D to organize them to flee abroad, in specific: In late 2015, Mr. Phan Thanh B in Farm Township V, District B who knew trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay emigration ring of Mai Thi H asked H to prepare paperwork for his son Phan Anh T to emigrate to Federal Republic of Germany at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cost of USD 19,000. Phan Anh T and his family completed trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paperwork and paid H trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cost. About early 2016, Mai Xuan D asked Mai Anh T to go to Hanoi to travel Asean countries by airplanes. On March 14, 2016, Phan Anh T and other people flied to Ho Chi Minh City. On March 15, 2016, Phan Anh T and other people flied to Serbia thanks to assistance of D. On arrival in Serbia, Phan Anh T was helped by D to flee across trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border illegally into Hungary 2 times but failed. In trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay third time, while Phan Anh T and other people were fleeing across trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border into Romania, they were arrested and returned to Vietnam.
About December 2015, Phan Thi G in Village 1, Commune B, District B was introduced by a friend in Federal Republic of Germany an emigration ring to Europe of Mai Thi H. Then, Phan Thi G called H and H agreed and told Phan Thi G to prepare USD 19,000 and a dossier. In January 2016, H called Phan Thi G informing that there would be a trip to Germany and H gave trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay phone number of Mai Xuan D in Hanoi to Phan Thi G to contact. After that, Phan Thi G submitted relevant documents to D. She transferred USD 19,000 multiple times to D and H. On April 16, 2016, Phan Thi G was assisted by D to fly to Serbia. From April 2016 to September 2016, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay ring of H sent Phan Thi G and other people multiple times to Federal Republic of Germany by road through neighbor countries but failed. In October 2016, Phan Thi G was assisted to cross trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border to Romany and then flee to Federal Republic of Germany but she was arrested by Romania Police. On December 23, 2016 Phan Thi G was deported back to Vietnam.
About July 2015, Mai Thi H directly received dossier and VND 400,000,000 from Truong Van D in Commune T, District B for illegal emigration but failed. Until March 2016, Mai Xuan D sent Truong Van D to Serbia and trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay ring of D organized Truong Van D to cross trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border to Federal Republic of Germany multiple times but failed. Until October 2016, Truong Van D was deported back to Vietnam.
Through introduction of a friend in Federal Republic of Germany, Nguyen Thi Hoa T in Village 5, Commune B, District B knew trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay emigration ring of Mai Thi H. About September 2015, Nguyen Thi Hoai T asked H to meet in City D and H agreed receiving trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay dossier and completing trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay paperwork to send Nguyen Thi Hoai T to Federal Republic of Germany at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cost of USD 19,000 and H transferred such dossier to Mai Xuan D. After that, H gave Nguyen Thi Hoai T trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay phone number of Mai Xuan D to contact. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay family of Nguyen Thi Hoai T paid H such amount of money. On March 11, 2016, Nguyen Thi Hoai T and other people were assisted to fly from Hanoi to Sai Gon and then fly to Turkey and then Serbia. In September 2016, D organized Nguyen Thi Hoai T and 5 other people to cross trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border to Serbia and to Hungary but failed. After that, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay ring of D hired a Swiss to take Nguyen Thi Hoai T and other people to cross trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border to Serbia and to Rumania, however, they were arrested by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Rumania Border Police. On December 13, 2016, Nguyen Thi Hoai T and other people were deported back to Vietnam using trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay laissez-passers issued by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Embassy of Vietnam.
Through a friend who has worked in Federal Republic of Germany, Nguyen Ngoc M in Village 6, Commune B, District B knew trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay illegal emigration ring of Mai Thi H. Nguyen Ngoc M contacted H and H agreed at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay cost of USD 19,000. Nguyen Ngoc M and family submitted trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay dossier and paid money to H. In December 2015, H gave Nguyen Ngoc M trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay phone number of Mai Xuan D to contact. On March 12, 2016, D assisted Nguyen Ngoc M and other people to fly to Ho Chi Minh City, and fly to Turkey 3 days later and to Serbia. In September 2016, D organized Nguyen Ngoc M and other people to cross trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border to Hungary but failed. About 2 weeks later, when Nguyen Ngoc M and other people were being led to cross trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border to Rumania by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay gang member, they were arrested. On December 12, 2016, Nguyen Ngoc M was issued with a laissez-passer by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Embassy of Vietnam in Rumania to return to Vietnam.
Apart from above people, Mai Xuan D collected money and received dossiers in person and organized other people to flee abroad, in specific: D collected money and dossier of Mrs. Nguyen Thi Thuy D in Neighborhood 2, Ward B, Town B, Quang Binh Province; Mai Xuan H who is D's older brother in Neighborhood 1, Ward H, City D, Nguyen Dang T in District V, Quang Tri Province, Bui Thi T in District V, Vinh Phuc Province. After collecting money and receiving their dossiers, D organized them to cross trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay border to Federal Republic of Germany multiple times but failed, until December 12, 2016 they were deported back to Vietnam. During trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay investigation process, Mai Xuan D made a getaway, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Investigation Security Agency of Quang Binh Public Security issued a Wanted Decision and an Investigation Suspension Decision against Mai Xuan D.
Mai Thi H received dossier and money in person from Mrs. P in Commune T, District B, Quang Binh Province to help Mrs. P emigrate illegally but failed. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay place of residence of Mrs. P cannot be identified during trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay investigation process, in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay other hand, Mrs. P does not make a denunciation of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay offense committed by Mai Thi H.
Exhibits of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case: During trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay investigation process, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Investigation Security Agency of Quang Binh Public Security seized 3 handwritten documents of Mai Thi H in form of a lending money document (enclosed with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file).
With regard to civil liability: During trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay investigation process, Mai Thi H reimbursed trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay family of Phan Anh T USD 19,000 in full; reimbursed VND 50,000,000 to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay family of Phan Thi G; reimbursed VND 400,000,000 to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay family of Nguyen Thi Hoai T and Nguyen Ngoc M. Mai Thi H was also required to repay trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay remaining amount that she received.
trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Indictment No. 87/THQCT-KSDT-TA dated November 30, 2017 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Procuracy of Dong Hoi City prosecuted trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H for "Organizing other people to flee abroad" under Clause 2, Article 275 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999.
trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Criminal Case No. 09/2018/HS-ST dated January 31, 2018 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People's Court of Dong Hoi District pronounced trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H guilty of "Organizing others to flee abroad".
Pursuant to Clause 2 Article 275; Points b, p Clause 1, Clause 2 Article 46; Article 47; Article 33 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H was sentenced to 4 years 6 months in prison, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay prison term commences from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date of arrest for verdict enforcement.
Pursuant to Article 42 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999; Article 584; 585 oftrực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Civil Code 2015 in Viet Nam; trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H was compelled to reimburse VND 245,000,000 to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Hoai T; reimburse VND 245,000,000 to Mrs. Nguyen Ngoc M, reimburse VND 431,000,000 to Mrs. Phan Thi G.
Mai Thi H was compelled to pay VND 200,000 of first instance criminal court fee and VND 39,630,000 of first instance civil court fee to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay state fund.
trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay court also declared trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay right to appeal trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Verdict of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H and aggrieved parties, and person with relevant rights and obligations.
Within trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay statutory time limit, on December 7, 2018, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H filed an appeal as follows: Request trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court of Appeal to consider imposing Mai Thi H a suspended sentence.
On December 12, 2018, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Chief Procurator of People’s Procuracy of Dong Hoi City issued an Appeal Decision No. 02/KHPT-HS against trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sentence section of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Criminal Verdict No. 09/2018/HS-ST dated January 31, 2018 of People’s Court of Dong Hoi City, requesting trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay People’s Court of Quang Binh Province to conduct trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate trial and increase trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sentence imposed on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H.
At trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court hearing, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H pleads guilty of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay same offence as stated in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Indictment and in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Verdict, she upholds trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal for a suspended sentence or commutation.
trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay procurator who is in charge of bringing appellate prosecution upholds trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal and requests trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel not to accept trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal filed by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H; to accept trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Chief Procurator of People’s Procuracy of Dong Hoi City to revise trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Verdict and increase trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sentence against Mai Thi H from 6 to 9 months in prison.
JUDGEMENT OF trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay COURT
On trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay basis of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay content of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case, based on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay documents available in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file, which have been litigated at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay trial, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel shall determine as follows:
Considering that trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay confession made by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court hearing in conformity with her depositions and depositions of those who paid Mai Thi H to organize them to flee abroad during trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay investigation process and at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay first instance court hearing, in conformity with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay testimonies of persons with relevant rights and obligations, evidence and documents available in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case file, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel considers that trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Criminal Verdict No. 09/2018/HS-ST dated January 31, 2018 of People’s Court of Dong Hoi City pronouncing trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H guilty of “Organizing others to flee abroad” is considered as guilty person is rightly convicted as per trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay law.
[1] Deeming trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal made by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Chief Procurator of People’s Procuracy of Dong Hoi City requesting People’s Court of Quang Binh Province to conduct an appellate court hearing to increase trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sentence imposed on trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel considers that: Those who paid Mai Thi H money to organize them to flee to Federal Republic of Germany all know that Mai Thi H is not permitted to organize them to work abroad; all know that Mai Thi H cannot send them to Federal Republic of Germany legally but send them abroad and hire a guide to lead them to immigrate illegally to Federal Republic of Germany and then attempt to stay in Federal Republic of Germany in search of work; however, they still accepted Mai Thi H’s offer, thus, they are not aggrieved parties in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay case. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court of Instance was not right when determining those who paid Mai Thi H money to organize them to flee abroad are aggrieved parties and apply trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay mitigating circumstances according to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay amount that Mai Thi H reimbursed them as prescribed in Point b Clause 1 Article 46 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999. trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H committed trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay offence “Organizing others to flee abroad” multiple times, thus, she is supposed to be prosecuted and tried as prescribed in Clause 2 Article 275 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999 with trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sentence bracket of 5 years to 12 years, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant’s offence directly infringed trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay state management order in terms of entry and exit, disturbed trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay peace and security, and compromised trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay foreign affairs of Vietnam and countries to which Vietnamese people illegally emigrated. Although trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant committed a serious offence and have bad criminal record, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court of First Instance imposed her a sentence of 4 years 6 months pursuant to Article 47 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999, less than trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay level of Clause 2 Article 275 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999, which is considered a light sentence against trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant. According to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay nature and severity of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay offence committed by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Trial Panel considers that it is essential to accept trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal made by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Chief Procurator of People Procuracy of Dong Hoi City to increase trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay sentence imposed on Mai Thi H as requested by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay procurator at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court hearing.
[2] With regard to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal for suspended sentence or commutation filed by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Trial Panel considers that although trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant committed a serious offence and has bad criminal record, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court of First Instance imposed her a sentence of 4 years 6 months pursuant to Article 47 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999, less than trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay starting level of Clause 2 Article 275 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999, to which was appealed for an increase in sentence by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Chief Procurator of People’s Procuracy of Dong Hoi City. Therefore, it is impossible to accept trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant to revise trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Verdict towards granting a commutation or suspended sentence as stated in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant’s appeal and opinions given at trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate court hearing.
[3]. With regard to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate criminal court fee payable by Mai Thi H.
Because Mai Thi H’s appeal is not accepted, she has to incur trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate criminal court fee as prescribed in Clause 2 Article 135, Clause 2 Article 136 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Procedure Code 2015; Point b Clause 2 Article 23 of Resolution No. 326/2016/Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly 14 dated December 30, 2016 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Standing Committee of National Assembly on court fees and charges.
trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court of First Instance was not right when determining procedural capacity of those who were organized to flee abroad illegally and considering trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant’s reimbursement to them as a mitigating circumstance as prescribed in Point b Clause 2 Article 46 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999. However, this part of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Verdict is not appealed so trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court of Appeal does not revise it but point out that mistake for trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Court of First Instance to learn from.
Other decisions made in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Verdict regarding compelling Mai Thi H to reimburse money to those who were organized to flee abroad, to pay VND 200,000 of first instance criminal court fee and VND 39,630,000 of first instance civil court fee to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay state fund which are not appealed will take effect from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay deadline for appeal.
Pursuant to documents and evidence mentioned above:
HEREBY DECIDES
Pursuant to Point b Clause 1 Article 355, Point a Clause 2 Article 357, Clause 2, Articles 135, 136 oftrực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Procedure Code 2015 in Viet Nam; Point b Clause 2 Article 23 ofNghị quyết 326/2016/UBTVQH14 quy định về mứcdated December 30, 2016 of Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay National Assembly on appellate court fees and charges;
1. Accept trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal made by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Chief Procurator of People’s Procuracy of Dong Hoi City to revise trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Verdict.
Pursuant to Clause 2 Article 275; Points b, p Clause 1, Clause 2 Article 46; Article 33; Article 33 oftrực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Criminal Code 1999 in Viet Nam, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H is sentenced to 5 years in prison for “Organizing others to flee abroad”, trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay prison term commences from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date of arrest for verdict enforcement.
2. Refuse trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appeal for suspended sentence or commutation filed by trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H.
3. With regard to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate criminal court fee payable by Mai Thi H:
trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay defendant Mai Thi H has to pay VND 200,000 of trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay appellate criminal court fee.
Other decisions made in trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay First Instance Verdict regarding compelling Mai Thi H to reimburse VND 245,000,000 to Mrs. Nguyen Thi Hoai T; VND 245,000,000 to Mrs. Nguyen Ngoc M, VND 431,000,000 to Mrs. Phan Thi G; to pay VND 200,000 of first instance criminal court fee and VND 39,630,000 of first instance civil court fee to trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay state fund which are not appealed will take effect from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay deadline for appeal
trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay Appellate Verdict takes effect from trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay date of pronouncement (April 12, 2018).