trực tiếp bóng đá k+Verdict No. 34/2018/HS-PT dated August 29, 2018 on deliberate infliction of bodily harm upon another person

PEOPLE'S COURT OF YEN BAI PROVINCE

VERDICT NO. 34/2018/HS-PT DATED AUGUST 29, 2018 ON DELIBERATE INFLICTION OF BODILY HARM UPON ANOTHER PERSON

On August 29, 2018, at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Office of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Court of Yen Bai province, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Court of Yen Bai province opened trực tiếp bóng đá k+ public appellate hearing of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ criminal case No. 52/2018/TLPT-HS dated June 29, 2018 for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants Dang Van T and Ha Van B due to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of Mrs. Do Thi L who is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance criminal verdict No.06/2018/HS-STdated May 23, 2018 of People’s Court of District Y, Yen Bai Province.

- Appellees:

1/ Defendant:Dang Van T– Other name: None - Date of birth: February 8, 1981 in District Y; Registered place of permanent residence and current residence: Village Y1, Commune H, District Y, Yen Bai Province; Occupation: freelance; Education level:  09/12; Ethnicity: Kinh people; Religion: None. His father: Dang Van Ch - born in 1956, his mother: Tran Thi M - born in 1959; his wife: Luong Thi H1, born in 1984 (divorced) and his two children: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ eldest child was born in 2004, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ younger child was born in 2007. Previous convictions or administrative violations: None. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant was arrested and detained from November 26, 2017, currently detained in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remand centre of Public Security of Yen Bai Province (present at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court hearing).

2/ Defendant:Ha Van B- Other name: None - Date of birth: July 23, 1990 in District Y; Registered place of permanent residence and current residence: Village N, Commune H, District Y, Yen Bai Province; Occupation: freelance; Education level: 12/12; Ethnicity: Tay people; Religion: None. His father: Ha Van N1 - born in 1966, his mother: Vu Thi Nh - born in 1968; his wife: Ha Thiet Th, born in 1994 and his two children: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ eldest child was born in 2013 and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ younger child was born in 2015. Previous convictions or administrative violations: None. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant was arrested and detained from November 26, 2017, currently detained in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remand centre of Public Security of Yen Bai Province (present at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court hearing).

- Aggrieved party:Mr. Bui Van A, born in 1981 (died)

Place of residence: Village E, Commune H, District Y, Yen Bai Province.

- Legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party who filed an appeal:Mrs. Do Thi L – born in 1093. Place of residence: Village E, Commune H, District Y, Yen Bai Province. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ wife of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party. (Present).

- Protector of legitimate rights and interests (hereinafter referred to as protector) of Mrs. Do Thi L:Mr. Dang Tat C - Lawyer of Dai An Law Office affiliated to Bar Association of Hanoi City. (Present).

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ CASE

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ documents contained in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case file and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ progress at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contents of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case are summarized as follows:

About 17 pm on November 25, 2017, Dang Van T was on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ way from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ wedding party at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house of Mr. Bui Van D to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house of his mother-in-law Ha Thi H2 in Village N, Commune H, District Y to pick up his son Dang Xuan Tr. On trực tiếp bóng đá k+ way home, T met trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cousin-in-law Ha Van B walking so he stopped to chat with him for a while before keep going home. When Dang Van T approached trực tiếp bóng đá k+ intersection next to Mr. Pham Van D’s house gate in Village N, Commune H, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ headlight of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ car with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ license plate No. 21A-033.61 owned by Mr. Bui Van A parked on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ street flashed on his face. Mr. A was out of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ car at that time but he had still used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ high beam headlight which projected trực tiếp bóng đá k+ light straight in Dang Van T. Being blinded by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ light, T parked trực tiếp bóng đá k+ motorbike in front of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ car of Mr. A and said “Why did you get off trực tiếp bóng đá k+ car without dimming trực tiếp bóng đá k+ high beam”, Mr. A answered “I will not dim, I dare you to do it”, leading to a quarrel between them. Hearing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ noise, Ha Van B returned and Mr. Pham Van D in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house near there dissuaded them from quarreling and pulled A into his house. Seeing T still cursing him, Mr. A returned and punched in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ left eye of T. Sitting on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ motorbike, T intended to jump off and hit Mr. A, then Mr. D pushed T in time. While Mr. D was pushing T, Ha Van B showed up, seeing T (his cousin) being beaten by Mr. A, B rushed to grab Mr. A’s collar and threw two consecutive punches on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ head and face of Mr. A by his right hand, making Mr. A dizzy and collapse. Seeing Mr. A being beaten, Mr. D helped him to sit up, Dang Van T moved forward and kept throwing 3 more punches on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ head and face of Mr. A. At that time, Mr. Pham Van D and his family tried to stop trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fighting. Sensing abnormal symptoms and unconsciousness of Mr. A, they rushed Mr. A to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Health Station of Commune H for first aid and then sent him to Polyclinic Hospital of Yen Bai Hospital for emergency aid but Mr. A died thereafter. Dang Van T and Ha Van B went home after beating Mr. A up and were arrested on November 26, 2017.

In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ forensic examination findings of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ corpse No. 82/TT dated November 29, 2017 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Center for Forensic Medicine of Yen Bai Province:

+ Key signs found through examination:

-  Bruised upper lip and lower lip.

-  Subdural haemorrhage, haemorrhage + hematomas of ventricles of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ brain

-  Heart, liver, lung hyperemia.

+ Causes of death: Subdural hemorrhage, hemorrhage + hematomas of ventricles of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ brain.

+ Mechanism of formation of injuries:

-  Bruised upper and lower lips were caused by a blunt instrument with a strong and direct force.

-  Subdural hemorrhage, hemorrhage + hematomas of ventricles of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ brain caused by a blunt instrument with a strong and direct force on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ head and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ face.

First Instance Criminal Verdict No. 06/2018/HSST dated May 23, 2018 of People’s Court of District Y, Yen Bai Province judged:

Pursuant to Clause 3 Article 104; Points b, p Clause 1 Article 46 oftrực tiếp bóng đá k+ Criminal Code 1999 in Viet Nam.

1.Declare that Dang Van T and Ha Van B are guilty of “Deliberate infliction of bodily harm”.

2.Penalties:

2.1.)Dang Van T is sentenced to 5 years and 6 months in prison; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ imprisonment term commences from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date of arrest and detention November 26, 2017.

2.2.)Ha Van B is sentenced to 5 years and 6 months in prison; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ imprisonment term commences from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date of arrest and detention November 26, 2017.

3. Civil liability: Pursuant to Article 42 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Criminal Code 1999; Point c, Clause 1 of Article 591; Article 357; Clause 2 of Article 468 oftrực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code in Viet Nam:

3.1) Dang Van T is compelled to provide a regular child support to Bui Duc Q, who was born on October 17th, 2002 VND 350,000 per month. (Three hundred and fifty thousand dong) until Q becomes 18 years old or other changes; a regular child support to Bui Quang X, who was born on May 1, 2012 VND 350,000 per month.

(Three hundred and fifty thousand dong) until X becomes 18 years old or other changes. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ period of support commences from December 2017.

3.2) Ha Van B is compelled to provide regular child support to Bui Duc Q, who was born on December 17th, 2002 VND 350,000 per month. (Three hundred and fifty thousand dong) until Q becomes 18 years old or other changes; a regular child support to Bui Quang X, who was born on May 1, 2012 VND 350,000 per month. (Three hundred and fifty thousand dong) until X becomes 18 years old or other changes. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ period of support commences from December 2017.

In addition, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ First Instance Verdict also determines trực tiếp bóng đá k+ delayed interest rate, court fees and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to appeal to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party as prescribed by law.

On June 6, 2018, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party Mrs. Do Thi L filed an appeal, claiming increased sentences on defendants and regular child support for Bui Duc Q and Bui Quang X.

At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court hearing, Mrs. Do Thi L upheld trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal, claiming increased sentences imposed on defendants and an increase in child support by VND 1,600,000 per month. Furthermore, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel was asked to reconsider trực tiếp bóng đá k+ charge in order to lay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ charge of “murder” against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Procuracy of Yen Bai Province expressed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ views of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Procuracy on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawsuit settlement and proposed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel: Pursuant to Point b, Clause 1 of Article 355; Point b, Clause 2 of Article 357 oftrực tiếp bóng đá k+ Criminal Procedure Code in Viet Nam. Accept a partial appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party. Amend trực tiếp bóng đá k+ First Instance Criminal Verdict No. 06/2018/HSST dated May 23, 2018 of People’s Court of District Y, Yen Bai Province with an orientation as follows: Applying  extenuating circumstances under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Clause 2, Article 46 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Criminal Code to defendants: Upholding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ charge and sentences against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants. Increasing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil liability for child support in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ way that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants must support Bui Duc Q and Bui Quang X VND 800,000 to VND 1,000,000 per month. (Each defendant has to support from VND 400,000 to VND 500,000 for each child).

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representatives of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party did not present any further argument.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ protector of legitimate rights and interests of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party: Agreeing with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ charge and extenuating circumstances; requesting trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel to apply extra aggravating circumstances to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants: “trực tiếp bóng đá k+ offender is determined to commit trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ end” and “trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime is of a gangster-like nature”. Increase trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sentences against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants to 10 to 12 years in prison. With regard to civil liability, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants have to provide child support of VND 1,600,000 per month.

Dang Van T and Ha Van B declared their entire offense as declared at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ investigating body and at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial of first instance. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants did not argue with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Procuracy. They disagreed with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ protector of aggrieved party because: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants had committed crime after trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party initiated trực tiếp bóng đá k+ attack in advance; prior to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ attack, there was no feeling of hatred between them, so trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants were not intentional to take trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim’s life. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel is requested to consider compensation levels for civil liability because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants have low income and no stable sources of income. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants do not agree to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ claim for support as required by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party.

JUDGMENT OF TRIAL PANEL

On trực tiếp bóng đá k+ basis of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ content of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case, based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ documents available in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case file, which have been litigated at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel shall determine as follows:

[1] Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legality of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party was submitted within trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statutory and valid time limit, so it was accepted by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel to hear under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate process.

[2] Regarding offenses: At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate hearing, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants pleaded guilty. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ depositions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate trial shall be consistent with their depositions at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ investigating bodies and at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance court hearing, in conformity with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ evidences and documents available in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case file and testimonies of witnesses. Therefore, there are substantial grounds for determining that: On November 25, 2017, being flashed by Bui Van A's car light in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ face, Dang Van T had quarrels, scolded Bui Van A and was beaten by Bui Van A. Seeing cousin Dang Van T being beaten by Bui Van A, Ha Van B used his right hand to grab A's collar and used his right hand to throw two punches on A’s head and face. When A collapsed, Dang Van T continued to throw 3 more punches on his head and face, making A comatose and he died on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ way to emergency.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants have full capacity for criminal responsibility and know that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ act of beating someone is a violation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law and are fully aware that punching in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ face and on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ head of another person with their fists will result in serious injury. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ acts of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants were highly dangerous to society, directly infringed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lives and health of other people protected by law.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ acts of defendants are proximate cause that took trực tiếp bóng đá k+ life of Bui Van A. However trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party have not had any grudge or conflict, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ acts of defendants were spontaneous, triggered by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ attack of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants’ objectives were to inflict injuries to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim only, so trực tiếp bóng đá k+ death of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party was beyond trực tiếp bóng đá k+ subjective consciousness and intention of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants. Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of First Instance’s adjudicating and declaring trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants guilty of "deliberate infliction of bodily harm" as stipulated in Clause 3, Article 104 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Criminal Code 1999 is appropriate, guilty person was rightly convicted.

[3] With regard to sentences: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of First Instance was right when applying Clause 3 Article 104; Points b, p Clause 1 Article 46 of Criminal Code 1999 to consider trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sentences to defendants according to their acts of throwing many punches in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's face and on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's head, causing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ death of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party due to subdural hemorrhage, hemorrhage and hematomas of ventricles of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ brain and application of extenuating circumstances “trực tiếp bóng đá k+ offender expresses cooperative attitude or contrition” and “trực tiếp bóng đá k+ offender pays damages or relieves trực tiếp bóng đá k+ consequences”. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants deliberately committed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same offense, but they have not discussed with each other and only received each other’s will to hit Mr. Bui Van A, so, it is considered as simple complicity, in which both of them are perpetrators who have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same role in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ offence. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same sentence was given to both defendants is appropriate.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ First Instance Judgment and documents available all substantiate that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party has had fault, but trực tiếp bóng đá k+ First Instance Judgment has not applied extenuating circumstances as prescribed in Clause 2 Article 46 of Criminal Code 1999, so it is necessary to apply them. Although trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants may benefit extenuating circumstances, but such a sentence of 5 years and 6 months seems to be corresponding to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ nature and extent of dangerous act committed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant. Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Appellate Trial Panel will not consider a decrease in sentence to defendants.

[4] Considering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal for increase in sentence and child support filed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party:

When deciding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sentences to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of First Instance considered aggravating circumstances and extenuating circumstances, faults and nature and extent of dangerous acts committed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants, and nature and roles of defendants in complicity to @ trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sentences. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court hearing, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants may benefit additional extenuating circumstances as prescribed in Clause 2 Article 46 of Criminal Code 1999, and incur no more aggravating circumstances. So, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel finds no ground to increase trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sentences to defendants. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ proposal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People’s Procuracy of Yen Bai Province at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ trial to uphold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sentences indicated in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ First Instance Verdict No. 06/2018/HS-ST dated May 23, 2018 of People’s Court of District Y, Yen Bai Province.

With regard to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ claim for increase in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ child support: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of First Instance’s decision to compel trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants to provide support is in accordance with Point c Clause 1 Article 591 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code. However, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ decision on a minimum support equal to a half of statutory pay rate pursuant to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Official Dispatch No. 24/1999/KHXX dated March 1999 is not appropriate. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ monthly support must be based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ needs of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ beneficiaries and financial capacity of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ obligee.

According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ minutes of income verification, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants earn an average of VND 150,000 per day, equivalent to VND 4,500,000 per month. It is beyond trực tiếp bóng đá k+ financial capacity of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant to provide monthly support of VND 1,600,000 for a child. Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel decides to establish a fixed monthly support of VND 1,000,000 for Bui Duc Q and Bui Quang X liable by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants (each defendant must provide a monthly support of VND 500,000) until trực tiếp bóng đá k+ children reach 18 years old or otherwise.

From trực tiếp bóng đá k+ foregoing consideration, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel deems it necessary to accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party to raise trực tiếp bóng đá k+ amount of support and change trực tiếp bóng đá k+ support method to amend trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil liability in terms of support of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ First Instance Verdict No. 06/2018/HS-ST dated May 23, 2018 of People’s Court of District Y, Yen Bai Province.

[5] At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court hearing, Mrs. Do Thi L made a further request in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal, proposing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel to consider changing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ charge to “Murder”. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ further appeal filed by Mrs. L is not accepted by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel because it worsens trực tiếp bóng đá k+ situation of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants and has no justifiable ground.

Opinions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of Mrs. Do Thi L on application of criminal liability as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ result of “trực tiếp bóng đá k+ offender is determined to commit trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ end” and “trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime is of a gangster-like nature has no justifiable ground because: According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ testimonies of witnesses and defendants, Mr. Pham Van D dissuaded T and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim from fighting when they had not picked a fight. When Mr. D was dissuading, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party hit T in advance (case file p.2002-203).  So, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant T’s reattacking trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party does not fall under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ offender deliberately commits trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime despite being dissuaded. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant Ha Van B’s attacking trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party when seeing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party hitting T (his cousin) in advance to save T from being attacked, so it cannot be considered as a gangster-like nature act. Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ protector of rights and legitimate interests of Mrs. Do Thi L is rejected by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel.

[6] trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants and legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party are not liable to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate criminal court fees. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party is not liable to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate civil court fees.

Other decisions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ First Instance Verdict do not have any appeal, so trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Panel disregards them and they remain legally effective from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ expiry of time limit for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal.

Pursuant to documents and evidence mentioned above:

HEREBY DECIDES

Pursuant to Point b, Clause 1 of Article 355; Point b, Clause 2 of Article 357 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Criminal Procedure Code;

Accept partial appeal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party, Mrs. Do Thi L. Amend trực tiếp bóng đá k+ decision on amount and method of child support in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ First Instance Verdict No. 06/2018/HS-ST dated May 23, 2018 of People’s Court of District Y, Yen Bai Province as follows:

1.With regard to crime:Declare that Dang Van T and Ha Van B are guilty of “Deliberate infliction of bodily harm”.

2.With regard to sentences:

- Pursuant to Clause 3, Article 104; Points b, p Clause 1, Clause 2 Article 46; Article 53 of Criminal Code 1999, Dang Van T is sentenced to 5 years and 6 months in prison. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ prison term commences from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date of arrest and detention on November 26, 2017.

- Pursuant to Clause 3, Article 104; Points b, p Clause 1, Clause 2 Article 46; Article 53 of Criminal Code 1999, Ha Van B is sentenced to 5 years and 6 months in prison. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ prison term commences from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date of arrest and detention on November 26, 2017.

3.With regard to civil liability:Pursuant to Article 42 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Criminal Code 1999; Point c, Clause 1 of Article 591; Article 357; Clause 2 of Article 468; Article 578 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code.

Dang Van T and Ha Van B each is compelled to provide a support for Bui Duc Q, born on October 17, 2002, VND 500,000 per month and a support for Bui Quang X, born on May 1, 2012, VND 500,000 per month. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ support duration commences from December 2017 until they reach 18 years old or otherwise.

After trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Verdict takes legal effect, from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ day on which trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party, Mrs. Do Thi L requests to execute trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sentence, if defendants Dang Van T, Ha Van B have not provided trực tiếp bóng đá k+ supports as mentioned above, they shall also be liable to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ interest amount of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ judgment debt with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ interest rate specified in Clause 2 of Article 468 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code.

4.With regard to court fees: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendants Dang Van T, Ha Van B and legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party are not liable to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate criminal court fees. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal representative of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggrieved party is not liable to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate civil court fees.

Other decisions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ First Instance Verdict which do not have any appeal will remain legally effective from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ expiry of time limit for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil judgment creditor and civil judgment debtor are lawfully allowed to reach an agreement on judgment enforcement, request judgment enforcement, be subject to voluntary execution or coercive judgment enforcement in compliance with regulations in Article 6, 7 and 9 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on enforcement of civil judgments, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effective period of judgment enforcement shall comply within provisions in Article 30 oftrực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law on enforcement of civil judgments in Viet Nam.