According to Article 260 đá bóng trực tiếp theCriminal Code 2015(amended by Clause 72 Article 1 đá bóng trực tiếp theLaw amending the Criminal Code 2017), the crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating regulations on road traffic participation is as follows:
Crime đá bóng trực tiếp Violating Regulations on Road Traffic Participation
1. Anyone participating in road traffic who violates regulations on road traffic safety causing damage to another person in one đá bóng trực tiếp the following cases shall be fined from 30,000,000 VND to 100,000,000 VND, subject to non-custodial reform for up to 03 years, or imprisoned from 01 year to 05 years:
a) Causing death;
b) Causing injury or harm to the health đá bóng trực tiếp one person with a bodily injury rate đá bóng trực tiếp 61% or more;
c) Causing injury or harm to the health đá bóng trực tiếp two or more people with a total bodily injury rate đá bóng trực tiếp 61% to 121%;
d) Causing damage to property from 100,000,000 VND to less than 500,000,000 VND.
2. Committing the crime in one đá bóng trực tiếp the following cases shall be punishable by imprisonment from 03 years to 10 years:
a) Without a valid driver's license as prescribed;
b) Under the influence đá bóng trực tiếp alcohol with blood or breath alcohol concentration exceeding the prescribed limits, or using drugs or other strong stimulants;
c) Fleeing to evade responsibility or intentionally not helping victims;
d) Disobeying traffic controller or guide signals;
dd) Causing the death đá bóng trực tiếp 02 people;
e) Causing injury or harm to the health đá bóng trực tiếp two or more people with a total bodily injury rate đá bóng trực tiếp 122% to 200%;
g) Causing damage to property from 500,000,000 VND to less than 1,500,000,000 VND.
3. Committing the crime in one đá bóng trực tiếp the following cases shall be punishable by imprisonment from 07 years to 15 years:
a) Causing the death đá bóng trực tiếp 03 or more people;
b) Causing injury or harm to the health đá bóng trực tiếp three or more people with a total bodily injury rate đá bóng trực tiếp 201% or more;
c) Causing property damage đá bóng trực tiếp 1,500,000,000 VND or more.
4. Violating road traffic participation regulations in cases where actual potential exists for the consequences prescribed in points a, b, and c đá bóng trực tiếp clause 3 đá bóng trực tiếp this Article, if not promptly prevented, shall be fined from 10,000,000 VND to 50,000,000 VND, subject to non-custodial reform up to 01 year, or imprisonment from 03 months to 01 year.
5. The offender may also be banned from holding certain positions or practicing certain professions or doing certain jobs for 01 to 05 years.
Thus, anyone who runs a red light and causes a traffic accident that results in damage to another person, falling into one đá bóng trực tiếp the cases mentioned above, shall be prosecuted for criminal liability on the charge đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations, with a penalty ranging from 01 year to 15 years in prison.
In addition, the offender may also be prohibited from holding certain positions, practicing a certain profession, or doing certain jobs for 01 to 05 years.
Below is a compilation đá bóng trực tiếp judgments on acts đá bóng trực tiếp running a red light causing traffic accidents classified as crimes đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations:
No. | Judgment Name | Issued Date | Court |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Judgment 489/2023/HS-PT on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | June 13, 2023 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp District D, Hanoi City |
2 | Judgment 80/2022/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | September 29, 2022 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp District H, Thai Binh Province |
3 | Judgment 65/2022/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | September 14, 2022 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp District-level Town Hoa Thanh, Tay Ninh Province |
4 | Judgment 336/2022/HS-PT on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | August 16, 2022 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Ho Chi Minh City |
5 | Judgment 58/2022/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | August 08, 2022 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp District Th - Province B |
6 | Judgment 124/2022/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | July 29, 2022 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp District-level Town P, Province B |
7 | Judgment 121/2022/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | July 29, 2022 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp District G, Hanoi City |
8 | Judgment 47/2022/HS-PT on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | May 30, 2022 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Can Tho City |
9 | Judgment 53/2022/HS-PT on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | April 04, 2022 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Long An Province |
10 | Judgment 213/2021/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | October 26, 2021 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Ha Dong District, Hanoi City |
11 | Judgment 35/2021/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating regulations on road traffic participation | September 14, 2021 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Hoi An City, Quang Nam Province |
12 | Judgment 27/2021/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | June 28, 2021 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Hoa Vang District, Da Nang City |
13 | Judgment 16/2024/HS-PT on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | January 03, 2024 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Dak Lak Province |
14 | Judgment 55/2023/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | September 28, 2023 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Thach Ha District, Ha Tinh Province |
15 | Judgment 43/2021/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | April 29, 2021 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Ba Vi District, Hanoi City |
16 | Judgment 23/2021/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | February 03, 2021 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Thanh Khe District, Da Nang City |
17 | Judgment 19/2021/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | January 28, 2021 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi City |
18 | Judgment 02/2021/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | January 26, 2021 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Huong Son District, Ha Tinh Province |
19 | Judgment 05/2021/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | January 14, 2021 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp District C, Ben Tre Province |
20 | Judgment 22/2021/HS-PT on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | January 12, 2021 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Ho Chi Minh City |
21 | Judgment 52/2020/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | December 21, 2020 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp CS District, GL Province |
22 | Judgment 66/2020/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | November 11, 2020 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Ngu Hanh Son District, Da Nang City |
23 | Judgment 297/2020/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | November 04, 2020 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Thuan An City, Binh Duong Province |
24 | Judgment 114/2020/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | August 21, 2020 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Nghe An Province |
25 | Judgment 114/2020/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | August 21, 2020 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Nghe An Province |
26 | Judgment 235/2020/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | July 22, 2020 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Dong Da District, Hanoi City |
27 | Judgment 58/2020/HS-PT on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | July 02, 2020 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Ca Mau Province |
28 | Judgment 84/2020/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | June 23, 2020 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp Hai Duong City, Hai Duong Province |
29 | Judgment 43/2020/HS-ST on crime đá bóng trực tiếp violating road traffic participation regulations | May 12, 2020 | People's Court đá bóng trực tiếp District 3, Ho Chi Minh City |
PleaseLoginto be able to download