[null] [null]

When xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube an Industrial Property Registration Application Considered Valid?

My name xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube Huyen Trang, currently living and working in Nghe An. Recently, I have been researching industrial property applications and learned that an application xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube considered valid when it meets certain regulations. However, I still do not know specifically: In which cases xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube an industrial property application considered valid and not deemed invalid? I would very much appreciate the assistance of the advisory board.(******@gmail.com)

In Section 13 of Circular 01/2007/TT-BKHCN guiding the implementation of Decree 103/2006/ND-CP on the enforcement of the Intellectual Property Law regarding industrial property issued by the Ministry of Science and Technology, amended by Clause 12, Article 1 of Circular 16/2016/TT-BKHCN, it xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube stipulated that an application xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube considered valid if it meets the regulations in Point 7 of this Circular anddoes not fall into any of the following cases:

- The application xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube made in a language other than Vietnamese, except as provided for in Points 7.3 and 7.4 of this Circular;

- The declaration lacks sufficient information about the author (for patent registration applications, industrial design registration applications, and layout design registration applications), about the applicant, about the representative, and lacks the signature and/or seal (if any) of the applicant or the representative;

- There xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube a basis to assert that the applicant has no right to register;

- The application xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube submitted in violation of the provisions of Article 89 of the Intellectual Property Law;

- The application has defects stated in Point 13.3 of this Circular that affect the validity of the application and, despite being requested to be corrected by the Intellectual Property Office, the applicant has not corrected them or the corrections do not meet the requirements;

- There xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube an apparent basis to immediately assert that the object mentioned in the application xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube not protected by the State according to the provisions of Articles 59, 64, 69, 73, and Article 80 of the Intellectual Property Law.

- The application xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube submitted in violation of the regulations on security control for inventions prior to overseas registration in Clause 2, Article 23b of Decree No. 103/2006/ND-CP, including cases where the international application xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube submitted directly to the international office.

The above xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube the advisory content.

Respectfully!

Related Posts
LawNet
Determination of the Priority Date in an Industrial Property Application
LawNet
When xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube an Industrial Property Registration Application Considered Valid?
LawNet
How xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube Technology Understood According to New Regulations?
LawNet
Understanding the Concept of "Secret"
LawNet
What xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube Technology Appraisal?
LawNet
What xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube Technology Evaluation?
LawNet
Decoding Technology: What xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube it?
LawNet
What xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube Technology Innovation?
LawNet
Definition of Technology Incubators and Science and Technology Enterprise Incubators
LawNet
What xem bóng đá trực tiếp trên youtube the Incubation of Science and Technology Enterprises?
Lượt xem:0
Latest Post

Đơn vị chủ quản: Công tyTHƯ VIỆN PHÁP LUẬT.
Chịu trách nhiệm chính: Ông Bùi Tường Vũ - Số điện thoại liên hệ: 028 3935 2079
P.702A , Centre Point, 106 Nguyễn Văn Trỗi, P.8, Q. Phú Nhuận, TP. HCM;