trực tiếp bóng đá k+18 judgments, decisions proposed to be developed into case law

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ permission to apply precedents in judicial activities marks one of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ critical milestones in judicial reform; ensuring trực tiếp bóng đá k+ unified application of law in adjudication; ensuring that cases with similar legal details and events must be resolved in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same manner; simultaneously addressing gaps in legal provisions and creating stability and transparency in court rulings. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court has announced trực tiếp bóng đá k+ release of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first 06 precedents officially for courts to study and apply in adjudication.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ workshop discussed issues related to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ process of selecting, publishing, and applying precedents; solutions to improve trực tiếp bóng đá k+ quality of court judgments and decisions; evaluations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ announced precedents; and provided feedback on judgments and decisions proposed to be developed into precedents.

18 judgments and decisions proposed to be developed into precedents

1. Supervisory and review decision No. 28/2011/DS-GDTdated August 18, 2011, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case“Dispute over house and land ownership rights”.

   Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

   trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court must annul trực tiếp bóng đá k+ decision to apply provisional urgent measures that were applied during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case resolution process before issuing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ decision to suspend trực tiếp bóng đá k+ resolution of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil case.

2. Supervisory and review decision No. 03/2014/DS-GDTdated January 09, 2014, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case“Dispute over contract for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer of house ownership rights and land use rights”.

   Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

   - In cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house belongs to state ownership and is earmarked for sale to long-term tenants as per trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law, if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ long-term tenant signs a contract to transfer house ownership rights before obtaining trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house ownership certificate, it is considered a conditional contract and not a violation of legal prohibitions.- If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract stipulates payment in gold but one party pays in money without trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other party's objection, it is considered equivalent to a gold payment agreement and not a contract violation.

3. Supervisory and review decision No. 12/2012/DS-GDTdated January 13, 2012, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Court of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case“Asset recovery”.

   Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

   Determining cases of gifting land use rights and attached assets with conditions and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ responsibility of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ recipient (children, grandchildren) to provide housing, care, and support to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ givers (grandparents, parents).

4. Supervisory and review decision No. 52/2014/GDT-DSdated November 21, 2014, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case“Inheritance dispute over assets”.

   Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

   In cases where one parent died intestate and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ surviving parent, from their lifetime until their death, agreed for their child to build a house on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, didn’t reclaim trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ child registered trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights, it shall be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ surviving parent gifted their portion of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property to that child.

5. Supervisory and review decision No. 126/2013/DS-GDTdated September 23, 2013, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil case“Dispute over house ownership and use rights”.

   Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

   In cases where a house sale contract is documented, signed by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller, clearly stating that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller has received full payment, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer, though not signed, holds trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract and has managed and used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house stably for a long time without trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller disputing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house payment, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract remains valid indicating trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer's payment and agreement with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house sale contract.

6. Supervisory and review decision No. 143/2013/DS-GDTdated November 13, 2013, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case“Dispute over contract for gifting land use rights”.

   Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

   trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract for gifting land use rights is invalid when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ recipient does not meet trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conditions for house ownership in Vietnam; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fault for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ invalid contract belongs to both parties.

7. Supervisory and review decision No. 83/2013/DS-GDTdated July 08, 2013, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil case“Inheritance dispute over assets”.

   Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

   In inheritance dispute cases, if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ estate manager has rented out trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inherited house/land to enjoy benefits, there is no need to deduct management efforts, only consider and calculate any repairs, renovations, and constructions on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inherited estate (if any).

8. Supervisory and review decision No. 26/2013/DS-GDTdated April 22, 2013, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil case“Inheritance dispute over assets”.

   Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

   In inheritance dispute cases, heirs who took care of, supported trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deceased, and managed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ estate must have their efforts in caregiving and managing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ estate deducted before trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining estate value is divided among trực tiếp bóng đá k+ heirs.

9. Appellate criminal judgment No. 03/2014/HSPT1dated June 12, 2014, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Central Military Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case“Fraud to appropriate assets”.

   Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

   If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ accused commits fraudulent acts to appropriate money but returns it before trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case is initiated, that amount cannot be counted towards determining criminal liability nor be considered a mitigating factor for voluntary compensation and remedying consequences under Point b, Clause 1, Article 46 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Penal Code for amounts returned before trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case initiation and not prosecuted.

10. Supervisory and review decision No. 23/2015/HS-GDTdated December 17, 2015, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case“Murder”.

    Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

    If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ accused, due to minor daily-life conflicts, despite trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim's apology and many people's interference, still resolutely commits acts leading to death, they must bear criminal responsibility for “Murder” with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ aggravating circumstance of “Having a hooligan nature”.

11. Supervisory and review decision No. 06/2016/HS-GDTdated June 16, 2016, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People's Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ criminal case against Trinh Van Thanh for“Violating land management and protection regulations”.

    Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

    trực tiếp bóng đá k+ petition for supervisory and review procedures for decisions on handling exhibits in effective judgments, if not detrimental to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ convicted person and related parties, can be conducted at any time.

12. Supervisory and review decision No. 29/2010/HS-GDTdated November 01, 2010, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ criminal case against Le Thi Lan Anh for“Abusing trust to appropriate assets”.

    Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

    In cases where labor contracts must be in writing according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law but aren't established as such, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ employee causes damage during assigned tasks, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ employer is liable for damages and can request trực tiếp bóng đá k+ responsible employee to reimburse as per legal provisions.

13. Appellate criminal judgment No. 01/2015/HS-PT1dated January 14, 2015, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Central Military Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ crime of“Snatching assets”.

    Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

    If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ accused uses motorbikes to snatch pedestrian assets in conditions without others on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ road, without causing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ victim to fall or be injured, posing minimal danger to others, only Clause 1, Article 136 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Penal Code should be applied, not trực tiếp bóng đá k+ “Dangerous tricks” clause in Point d, Clause 2, Article 136 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Penal Code.

14. Supervisory and review decision No. 12/2013/KDTM-GDTdated May 16, 2013, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ commercial case“Dispute over credit contract”.

    Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

    Determining interest rates for unpaid principal amounts that borrowers must pay from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ day following trực tiếp bóng đá k+ primary trial date.

15. Supervisory and review decision No. 02/2014/KDTM-GDTdated January 09, 2014, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case“Dispute over credit contract”.

    Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

    A secured property mortgage contract compliant with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law is valid even if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ secured transaction is not registered as required by law.

16. Supervisory and review decision No. 07/2013/KDTM-GDTdated March 15, 2013, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ commercial case“Dispute over goods sale contract”.

    Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

    - In cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ goods sale contract is breached by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller not delivering or fully delivering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ goods, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller must refund trực tiếp bóng đá k+ advance payment to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer and pay interest on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ delayed payment at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ average overdue debt interest rate of not less than three local Banks (namely Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of Vietnam, Vietnam Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade, etc.) at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of payment (primary trial), unless otherwise agreed or legally specified.- In cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ goods sale contract incurs penalties for violations or compensation for damages, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court must not calculate interest on these penalty and compensation amounts.

17. Supervisory and review decision No. 10/2016/KDTM-GDTdated May 20, 2016, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case“Dispute over credit contract”.

    Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

    A secured property mortgage contract regarding land use rights, which has been notarized, registered, and meets all contract validity conditions, remains valid even if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ secured party mistakenly values trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mortgaged property.

18. Supervisory and review decision No. 08/2014/HC-GDTdated August 19, 2014, by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Supreme People’s Court regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ administrative case“Complaint against trực tiếp bóng đá k+ compensation, support, and resettlement decision when trực tiếp bóng đá k+ state recovers land”.

    Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ precedent's content:

    In cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ decision approving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ support and resettlement plan of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Provincial People's Committee refers to another document that directly impacts trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's rights and interests, this decision is subject to litigation in administrative cases.

More details can be found inDraft.

CLICK HERE TO READ THIS ARTICLE IN VIETNAMESE