trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nayHanoi-Vietnam: Precedent No. 07/2016/AL

Precedent No. 07/2016/AL

Adopted by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Judicial Council of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People's Court of Vietnam on October 17, 2016, and published according to Decision No. 698/QD-CA dated October 17, 2016, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Chief Justice of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People's Court.

Source of Precedent:

Cassation Decision No. 126/2013/DS-GDT dated September 23, 2013, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Judicial Council of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People's Court of Vietnam regarding a civil case "Disputing Ownership and Use of a House" in Hanoi City between trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay plaintiffs Mr. Nguyen Dinh Song, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Hong, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Huong and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendants Mr. Do Trong Thanh, Mrs. Do Thi Nguyet, Mr. Vuong Chi Tuong, Mr. Vuong Chi Thang, Mrs. Vuong Bich Van, Mrs. Vuong Bich Hop; related parties include Mrs. Nguyen Thi Lan, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Hay, Mrs. To Thi Lam, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Uan, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Hop, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Hoa, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Minh Nguyet, Mrs. Tran Thi Bich, Mr. Vu Dinh Hau.

Position of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Precedent Content:

Paragraph 4 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay "Considering" section of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Cassation Decision mentioned above.

Summary of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Precedent:

- Precedent Situation:

A house purchase agreement was created in writing before July 1, 1991, signed by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay seller, clearly stating that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay seller had received full payment. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer, although not signing trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay agreement, kept trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay agreement and managed and used trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house stably for a long time without trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay seller disputing to claim trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house payment.

- Legal solution:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay agreement holds valid to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer had fully paid trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay seller and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer’s will was to agree with trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house purchase agreement. Hence, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house purchase agreement is recognized.

Legal provisions related to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Precedent:

- Articles 81, 82, 83Civil Procedure Code 2004(corresponding to Articles 93, 94, 95Civil Procedure Code 2015);

- Resolution No. 58/1998/NQ-UBTVQH10dated August 20, 1998, of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay National Assembly on civil transactions regarding residential houses established before July 1, 1991.

Keywords of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Precedent:

"House Sale Agreement"; "One Party Not Signing trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Agreement"; "Evidence Determination."

CASE CONTENT

In trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay petition dated March 6, 2006, and during trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay resolution process of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay case, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay plaintiff Mr. Nguyen Dinh Song presents: His father, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Chien (died in 1998), and his mother, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Mo (died in 2005), had four children including him, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Hong, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Huong, and Mrs. Nguyen Thi Lan. Previously, his family lived at 2, Hang Bun, while his uncle, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Nhuan, lived at No. 10 Hang Bun. When evacuated and returned, his uncle's house was taken by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay State and given to others to use. Hence, his father gave trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 2, Hang Bun to Mr. Nhuan, and his family rented a house, where Mr. Do Trong Thanh signed a contract with his father to rent trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac on February 1, 1972. house at 19, Thuoc Bac was owned by five siblings of Mr. Thanh: Mr. Do Trong Thanh, Mrs. Do Thi Nga, Mrs. Do Song Toan, Mrs. Do Thi Nguyet, and Mr. Do Trong Cao. Since Mr. Cao needed money for treatment, he sold a room of 38m2 on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac to his family. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay contract signed by Mr. Cao did not specify trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay date, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay selling price was 6550 dong, and Mr. Cao received trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay full amount. When Mr. Cao sold trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay 38m2 room, he handed over trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay title deed of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac, clearly stating Mr. Cao owned 8/12 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house, while Mr. Thanh, Mrs. Nga, Mrs. Nguyet, Mrs. Toan each owned 4/12 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac had been sold to Mr. Vu Dinh Tiep and Mrs. Tran Thi Bich by Mr. Thanh and his siblings. Mr. Cao fixed a kitchen room of 7m2 on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor to live in. After Mr. Cao died on November 5, 1972, Mr. Thanh and his siblings sold trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay remaining room of 7m2 on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac to his family for 3000 dong. They formalized trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay sale with a contract on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay day Mr. Cao died, November 5, 1972. Mr. Thanh and his siblings signed and stated they had received trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay full payment. Mr. Thanh handed over a power of attorney written by Mr. Cao on September 9, 1972, stating Mr. Cao was trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay owner of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac and authorized Mr. Thanh to sell trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay auxiliary room of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac on his behalf due to illness. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay purchase documents of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay two rooms on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of house at 19, Thuoc Bac were kept by his family, so his parents could sign them anytime. Mr. Thanh argued that his parents did not sign trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay purchase documents and thus had not paid was incorrect.

Mr. Nhuan passed away in 2000. His wife, Mrs. To Thi Lam, and their children, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Uan, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Hoa, Mrs. Nguyen Dinh Hop, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Minh Nguyet, confirmed that Mr. Chien purchased trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second-floor room from Mr. Cao and not Mr. Nhuan, making Mr. Nhuan only a nominal owner.

Mr. Thanh's family (residing at trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 17, Thuoc Bac) consistently created difficulties for his family. Mr. Thanh occupied trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay roof of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac, leading to his father discussing with Mr. Thanh not to use trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay roof but was ignored. Consequently, both parties formalized an agreement on December 20, 1987, allowing Mr. Thanh to use trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay roof mutually, but tensions continued to rise. His family then applied for trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay ownership transfer of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac, but Mr. Thanh obstructed. Hence, he demanded trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Court recognize trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay sale agreement of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac.

Additionally, he sought several compensations:

- Since trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac was sold to Mr. Tiep’s family and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor to his own family, Mr. Thanh had no rights over trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac. Therefore, Mr. Thanh could not use trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay roof of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor or trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay auxiliary area of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac.

His family purchased trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor with an oral agreement to access via trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay pathway through trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 17, Thuoc Bac (owned by Mr. Thanh). Hence, he requested Mr. Thanh not to store goods in trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay walkway leading from Hang Ca Street through houses No. 17 and 19 Thuoc Bac to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac.

- Compensation for occupying trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay roof and using trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay walkway to store goods since 1987 to date amounting to 540,000,000 VND (2,500,000 VND/month x 18 years).

- Compensation for injuries to him and his wife caused by Mr. Thanh’s son, amounting to 5,000,000 VND per person.

- Emotional distress compensation due to disputes causing instability to his family’s life, amounting to 800,000,000 VND.

- Mr. Thanh must cover trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay costs for repairing trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay roof damaged by Mr. Thanh’s belongings, estimated at 120,000,000 VND.

- Compensation for loss of employment due to prolonged litigation caused by Mr. Thanh, totaling 108,000,000 VND (12,000,000 VND/year x 9 years).

trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant, Mr. Do Trong Thanh, presented: trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac is recorded in land title No. 1577, Dong Xuan Block, with an area of 69m2 under trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay ownership of Mr. Do Huy Ngoc and Mrs. Le Thi Huu (his parents). On April 21, 1959, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay title was transferred to their children, specifically: Mr. Cao owned 8/12, while Mrs. Nga, Mrs. Nguyet, Mrs. Toan, and himself jointly owned 4/12 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house. In 1971, they allowed Mr. Chien and Mrs. Mo (Mr. Song's parents) to rent trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac. Later in 1971, Mr. Cao sold a room of 38m2 in trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac to Mr. Nguyen Dinh Nhuan, but Mr. Chien signed in place of Mr. Nhuan on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay sales document worth 6550 dong, undated.

On September 9, 1972, Mr. Cao authorized Mr. Thanh to sell an additional room of 7.8m2 on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac. Mr. Cao died on November 5, 1972. Based on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay authorization, Mr. Thanh drafted a sales document for trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay 7m2 room but was also asked by Mr. Chien to include trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay 38m2 room already bought from Mr. Cao; hence, he wrote a deed to sell trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay entire second floor and had his siblings sign it. However, Mr. Nhuan present then prevented Mr. Chien and his wife from signing trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay deed, so they never signed. Mr. Thanh did not agree with Mr. Song's requests, as Mr. Song was merely staying in Mr. Nhuan's place.

Mr. Thanh further stated: Mr. Cao sold trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay room in around 1971. Mr. Cao's authorization was invalid since trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house was a shared asset. They held no official documents for house at 19, Thuoc Bac due to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay dispute; trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 17, Thuoc Bac was officially documented as inherited property by a 1992 will. Mr. Thanh kept trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay original sale document by Mr. Cao to Mr. Nhuan, while other documents were not retained.

He disagreed with Mr. Song’s claim for ownership of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of house at 19, Thuoc Bac, asserting that Mr. Song's parents never signed or paid for trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay purchase document. Hence, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay sale agreement lacked legality, and Mr. Song lacked trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay right to claim trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay roof of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay pathway between houses No. 17 and 19 Thuoc Bac was only temporarily used by Mr. Song. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay auxiliary area of house at 19, Thuoc Bac had not been sold and was still used by them. Therefore, Mr. Song’s compensation claims for income loss were Reject as he was trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay initiator of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay disputes. Both parties incurred injuries, which trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay police did not address, thus rejecting damage compensation requests.

On April 7, 2009, Mr. Thanh countersued, demanding Mr. Song’s family use trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay exit that directly accessed trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay public pathway from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac, clarifying that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 17, Thuoc Bac remained his property while trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac sold to Mr. Tiep’s family under restricted occupancy excluding trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay walkway.

On September 23, 2009, Mr. Thanh withdrew his counterclaim regarding trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay walkway.

- Mrs. Do Thi Nguyet and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay children of Mrs. Do Thi Nga, including Mr. Vuong Chi Tuong, Mr. Vuong Chi Thang, Mrs. Vuong Bich Van, Mrs. Vuong Bich Hop, presented: Although Mr. Cao wrote to sell trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay 38m2 room, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house was jointly owned and hence void of sole authority. Mrs. Nga and Mrs. Nguyet signed for trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay 7m2 room sale but claimed trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer had not yet paid, thus requesting trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay return of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house.

Persons with related rights and obligations:

- Mrs. To Thi Lam presented: Her husband, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Nhuan, died in 2000. Previously, they lived at No. 10 Hang Bun Street and together with Mr. Chien's family. In 1970, Mr. Chien's family moved into trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac. She was unaware of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house purchase details but recalled Mr. Nhuan informing her in 1972 that Mr. Chien had purchased trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house under Mr. Nhuan’s name. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac was bought and paid for by Mr. Chien's family alone.

- Her children, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Uan, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Hoa, Mrs. Nguyen Dinh Hop, and Mrs. Nguyen Thi Minh Nguyet concurred with her statements.

- Mrs. Tran Thi Bich and Mr. Vu Dinh Hau presented: They occupied trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac. Mr. Thanh had no rights over requiring trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay walkway for Mr. Song’s family use. They had no further comments after Mr. Thanh withdrew his countercomplaint.

In trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay First-instance Judgment No. 78/DSST dated November 21, 2007, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Hanoi People’s Court:

- Reject Mr. Nguyen Dinh Song’s claim.

On November 21, 2007, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Song appealed.

In trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Appellate Judgment No. 121/2008/DSPT dated June 30, 2008, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Appellate Court of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People’s Court in Hanoi:

- Overturned trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance judgment, remanded for first-instance trial.

In trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay First-instance Judgment No. 52/2009/DSST dated September 29, 2009, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Hanoi People’s Court:

1. Reject trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay plaintiff’s claim for recognizing trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay sale agreement of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay entire second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac.

2. Accept Mr. Song’s request to make Mr. Thanh remove all belongings from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay roof of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 17, Thuoc Bac.

Both families would use trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay roof mutually as agreed on December 20, 1987.

3. Reject Mr. Song’s request to prevent Mr. Thanh from using trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay auxiliary area.

4. Determine trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay walkway from Hang Ca Street to lie within trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay land areas of houses No. 17 and 19 Thuoc Bac, free of obstruction for passage.

5. Reject all damage compensation claims against Mr. Thanh.

6. Reject other requests from trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay parties.

7. Dismiss Mr. Thanh’s counterclaim.

On October 1, 2009, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Song appealed against trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance court's decision.

On October 12, 2009, Mr. Do Trong Thanh appealed against trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance court’s decision regarding trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay walkway, requesting its temporary designation.

In trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Appellate Judgment No. 86/2010/DS-PT dated May 18, 2010, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Appellate Court of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People’s Court in Hanoi:

- Affirmed trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance judgment regarding trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house sale and other claims; annulled part of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance judgment, remanded for first-instance trial on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay walkway through trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 17, Thuoc Bac.

On July 20, 2010, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Song requested a supervisory review, demanding recognition of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second-floor sale agreement for trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac.

In Decision No. 148/2013/KN-DS dated April 11, 2013, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Chief Justice of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People’s Court appealed trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Appellate Judgment No. 86/2010/DS-PT dated May 18, 2010, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Appellate Court of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People’s Court in Hanoi; recommended trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Judicial Council of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People’s Court to void trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay said Appellate Judgment and First-instance Judgment No. 52/2009/DS-ST dated September 29, 2009, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Hanoi People’s Court; and remanded trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay case for first-instance trial according to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay law.

At trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay supervisory trial, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay representative of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People’s Procuracy proposed trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Judicial Council of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People’s Court accept trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Chief Justice’s appeal, but void trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Appellate Judgment No. 86/2010/DS-PT dated May 18, 2010, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Appellate Court of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People’s Court in Hanoi and remand trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay appellate level trial.trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Council of Judges of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People's Court concludes:

According to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay statements of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay plaintiff, and defendant, and documents in trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay case file, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at No. 19 Thuoc Bac Street, Hang Bo Ward, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi, owned by Mr. Do Huy Ngoc and Mrs. Le Thi Huu, was inherited by their children. Mr. Do Trong Cao (deceased in 1972, without a spouse or children) was entitled to 8/12, while Mrs. Do Thi Nga, Mrs. Do Thi Nguyet, Mrs. Do Thi Song Toan (deceased in 1963, without a spouse or children), and Mr. Do Trong Thanh shared 4/12. On July 1, 1971, Mr. Thanh signed a contract to rent out a room on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac Street, with an area of 39.36m², to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay family of Mr. Nguyen Dinh Nhuan (uncle of Mr. Nguyen Dinh Song, deceased in 2000) and Mr. Nguyen Dinh Chien (father of Mr. Song, deceased in 1998) for medical treatment expenses for Mr. Cao, for which he received an advance of 2000 dong.

In trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay "Deed of Absolute Sale of a Room" (undated but acknowledged by Mr. Thanh as written around 1971), Mr. Cao sold to Mr. Nhuan a room on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac Street (area not stated) for 6550 dong. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay seller had received full payment, noted as Mr. Chien representing and signing on behalf of Mr. Nhuan. Mr. Thanh claimed that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay sold room was trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay rented room mentioned above and sold to Mr. Nhuan, not to Mr. Chien. However, Mrs. To Thi Lam and Mr. Nguyen Dinh Uan, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Hoa, Mr. Nguyen Quynh Hop, and Mrs. Nguyen Thi Minh Nguyet (wife and children of Mr. Nhuan) all confirmed that Mr. Chien directly transacted and paid trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay money. Mr. Nhuan only nominally represented Mr. Chien on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house purchase contract made by Mr. Cao. Thus, there is a basis to determine that Mr. Chien was trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer of this room.

On September 9, 1972, Mr. Cao wrote an authorization for Mr. Thanh to sell trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay auxiliary room Mr. Cao was occupying. On November 5, 1972, Mr. Cao died intestate. On trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay same day, November 5, 1972, Mr. Thanh, Mrs. Nga, and Mrs. Nguyet signed trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay "Deed of Absolute Sale of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Second Floor of house at 19, Thuoc Bac Street," selling to Mr. Chien and his wife trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay main room of 38.07m² and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay auxiliary room of 7.095m², totaling 45.165m², for 3000 dongs. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay seller had received full payment, and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer had taken over and was using trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay deed was signed by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay sellers (Mr. Thanh, Mrs. Nga, and Mrs. Nguyet), and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyers (notably mentioned as Mr. Chien and Mrs. Mo) did not sign.

When trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay dispute arose, Mr. Song presented trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay two above-mentioned sale deeds and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay authorization from Mr. Cao to Mr. Thanh to sell trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house. In reality, Mr. Chien's family had managed both rooms on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac Street without any rental or purchase price disputes from Mr. Thanh's family living next door at No. 17 Thuoc Bac Street since 1972. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay content of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay "Deed of Absolute Sale of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Second Floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac Street" clearly indicated that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay seller had received full payment, and there was no separate payment receipt agreed upon by both parties, serving as proof that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer had paid. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer had not signed trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay purchase document, but trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer kept trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay document, thus confirming trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay seller's obligation of having received payment. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance and appellate courts' conclusion that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer had not signed trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay purchase document and could not prove payment to dismiss trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay plaintiff's request to recognize trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house sale contract was unjust to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay plaintiff's rights.

trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house sale transactions among Mr. Thanh and his siblings with Mr. Chien and Mrs. Mo predating July 1, 1991, necessitate referring to Resolution 58/1998/NQ-UBTVQH10 dated August 20, 1998, of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Standing Committee of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay National Assembly for resolving this case. Mrs. Nguyen Thi Lan (daughter of Mr. Chien and Mrs. Mo), who participated in trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay proceedings as an interested party due to inheriting trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay estate of Mr. Chien and Mrs. Mo, did not partake in this transaction. Mrs. Lan had settled in trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Czech Republic since 1997, and this sale was not a pre-July 1, 1991, house transaction involving an overseas Vietnamese before July 1, 1991. Thus, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance and appellate courts' reliance onResolution 1037/2006/NQ-UBTVQH11dated July 27, 2006, concerning civil transactions of houses with overseas Vietnamese before July 1, 1991, to resolve trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay case was incorrect.

For these reasons, pursuant to Clause 3, Article 291; Clause 3, Article 297; and Clause 2, Article 299 of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Civil Procedure Code (as amended and supplemented by Law No. 65/2011/QH12 dated March 29, 2011, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay National Assembly),

DECISION:

To annul trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay entire Appellate Judgment No. 86/2010/DS-PT dated May 18, 2010, by trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Appellate Court of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People's Court in Hanoi regarding trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay "Dispute over House Ownership and Use" between trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay plaintiff(s) Mr. Nguyen Dinh Song, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Hong, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Huong and trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay defendant(s) Mr. Do Trong Thanh, Mrs. Do Thi Nguyet, Mr. Vuong Chi Tuong, Mr. Vuong Chi Thang, Ms. Vuong Bich Van, Ms. Vuong Bich Hop; involving 9 related parties with interests and obligations.

trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay case file is transferred to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Appellate Court of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Supreme People's Court in Hanoi for retrial according to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay law.

CONTENT OF PRECEDENT

"In trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay dispute, Mr. Song presented trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay two above-mentioned sale deeds and Mr. Cao's authorization for Mr. Thanh to sell trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house. Indeed, Mr. Chien's family had managed both rooms on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay second floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac Street without any rental or purchase price disputes since 1972, while Mr. Thanh's family lived next door at No. 17 Thuoc Bac Street. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay content of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay "Deed of Absolute Sale of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay Second Floor of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay house at 19, Thuoc Bac Street" clearly indicated trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay seller had received trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay payment. There was no separate payment receipt agreement, serving as confirmation that trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer had paid. Although trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer had not signed trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay purchase document, trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer kept it, confirming trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay seller's obligation of receiving payment. trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay first-instance and appellate court's dismissal of trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay plaintiff's house purchase contract recognition request, based on trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay buyer's unsigned purchase document and unproven payment, was unjust to trực tiếp bóng đá euro hôm nay plaintiff's rights."

CLICK HERE TO READ THIS ARTICLE IN VIETNAMESE