25/10/2022 08:45

Distinguish between shared pathway xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 passage - Related judgment in Vietnam

Distinguish between shared pathway xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 passage - Related judgment in Vietnam

My neighbor xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 I have a dispute over the shared pathway. Therefore, I would like to know more about the regulations regarding this matter? "Minh Ha - Dong Thap, Vietnam"

xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Lawnet would like to answer your questions as follows:

1. What is shared pathway? What is passageway?

- What is shared pathway?

Currently, Vietnamese law does not have any regulation regarding shared pathway. However, it can be understood that a shared pathway is an area of land that is cut off for land users to use as a way to go to a public roadway.

- What is passage?

In contrast to the shared pathway, the passage xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 the right of passage are clearly defined by the Civil Code xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 the Land Law, specifically in Clause 1, Article 254 of Vietnam's Civil Code 2015:

"An owner of immoveable property which is surrounded by immoveable properties of other owners such that there is no exit has xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 right to request one of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 owners of adjoining immoveable properties to provide it with a passage to a public road on their land."

2. How to distinguish between the shared pathway xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 the passage?

Criteria

Passage

Shared pathway

Origin

- As agreed by xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 parties.

- To be decided by a court or other competent state agency if no agreement is reached

Part of parties lands are used to create a shared pathway

Compensation

- xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 owner of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 surrounded property must compensate xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 besieged property owner when requesting to open xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 passage through their property, unless otherwise agreed.

- In case the real estate is divided into several parts for different owners xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 users, when dividing, the necessary passage must be reserved for the people inside without compensation.

Common paths often do not have compensation because xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 parties contribute land to create paths for common use.

Area of land used

xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 location of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 passage is on xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 enclosing property (allowing xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 passage through someone else's land).

Agreed by xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 parties, but usually xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 boundary of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 land plot of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 parties or xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 trail that has been used for many years.

3. Some judgments on disputes over shared pathways

Judgment30/2019/DS-PTdated March 20, 2019 on xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 shared pathway dispute

- Judicial body: Lam Dong Province People's Court

- Level of trial: Appellate

Cancel the People's Court of D R district, Lam Dong province's judgment No. 09/2018/DS-ST dated August 16, 2018 on the "dispute over the common path" between Mr. xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Mrs. Ngo D. Th, Ms. Bui T Th1, xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Mr. xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Mrs. Le V T (Le V T T), Mrs. Phan Thi K S, whose related rights xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 obligations are Mr. xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Mrs. Ha V B, Mrs. Pham T T1, Mr. xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Mrs.

Judgment19/2019/DSST-STdated August 23, 2019 on xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 dispute over xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 right of shared pathway

- Judicial body: People's Court of Bao Lam district, Lam Dong province

- Level of trial: First instance

- Settlement result: Accepting the entire claim of plaintiff Ms. Tran Thi T about the "dispute over the right to a common path" against defendants Mr. xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Mrs. Tran Dinh Th, Mrs. Nguyen Thi Kim Tr.

Judgmentvtv5 trực tiếpdated January 17, 2018 on xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 dispute over xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 use of xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 shared pathway

- Judicial body: People's Court of Yen Bai province

- Level of trial: Appellate

- Settlement result: Accepting appeal requests of co-defendants: Mr. Nguyen Trong D., Ms. Tran Thi M., Cancellation of all first-instance civil judgments No. 04/2017/DS-ST dated September 19, 2017 of the People's Court of Y district, Yen Bai province xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 transfer of the case file to the People's Court of Y district to re-settle the case.

Judgment132/2018/DS-PTdated October 12, 2018 on xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 dispute to reclaim xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 shared pathway

- Judicial body: People's Court of Soc Trang province

- Level of trial: Appellate

- The settlement result: accepting the appeal of the defendants Mr. Nguyen Hoang B1 xem bóng đá trực tiếp vtv2 Ms. Truong Thi B2; correcting the first-instance civil judgment 29/2018/DS-ST dated June 19, 2018 of the People's Court of District Z, Soc Trang province on the "Dispute about reclaiming the shared pathway."

Best regards!

Nhu Y
258


PleaseLoginto be able to download
Login

Parent company: THU VIEN PHAP LUAT Ltd
Editorial Director: Mr. Bui Tuong Vu - Tel. (028) 7302 2286
P.702A , Centre Point, 106 Nguyen Van Troi, Ward 8, Phu Nhuan District, HCM City;