Overview of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ content of 15 current civil precedents in Vietnam

No

Precedents in Vietnam

Overview of Precedent

Content of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Precedent

1

trực tiếp bóng đá hômon dispute over property reclaim

In cases where Vietnamese people residing abroad have spent money to receive land use rights transfer and ask someone in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country to accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights transfer on their behalf, when resolving disputes, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must consider and calculate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effort to preserve, preserve, and embellish to increase trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of land use rights for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person in whose name trực tiếp bóng đá k+ household is named; In case it is not possible to determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ exact effort of that person, it is necessary to determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who actually paid to receive trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer of land use rights and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person whose name was transferred to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ household's land use rights had equal efforts to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ additional value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ difference compared to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original amount received from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ original transfer of land use rights.

"Although Ms. Thanh was trực tiếp bóng đá k+ one who spent 21.99 taels of gold to transfer trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land (equivalent to about 27,047,700 VND), trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer documents were in Mr. Tam's name. After receiving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer, Mr. Tam managed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, then transferred it to someone else. Thus, it should have been determined that Mr. Tam had contributed efforts in preserving, preserving, and embellishing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land to increase trực tiếp bóng đá k+ value of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land, so trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above amount (after deducting Ms. Thanh's principal equivalent to 21.99 gold taels) had to be determined as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ joint profit of Ms. Thanh and Mr. Tam. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same time, determine Mr. Tam's efforts to give Mr. Tam a portion corresponding to his efforts, which is correct and ensures trực tiếp bóng đá k+ rights of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigants (in case Mr. Tam's efforts cannot be accurately determined, it must be determined that Ms. Thanh and Mr. Tam have equal efforts to divide).

2

Precedent03/2016/ALon divorce

In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ event that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parents have given trực tiếp bóng đá k+ son and his wife an area of land and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ son and his wife have built a permanent house on that area of land as a place to live; When trực tiếp bóng đá k+ son and his wife built a house, his parents and other family members had no objections; If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ son and his wife have used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land continuously, openly, and stably, and have conducted a land declaration and been granted a land use right certificate, it must be determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ son and his wife were given land use rights.

“According to verification at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ People's Committee of Van Tao commune, in 2001 trực tiếp bóng đá k+ commune organized households in Van Tao commune to register to declare for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ issuance of certificates of use rights and households declared at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ village headquarters (BL 103). All households in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ commune are aware of this land declaration policy. Mr. Phac is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ landowner but did not declare it. Mr. Nam is on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land and is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ one who declares and completes trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certification procedures. On December 21, 2001, Mr. Nam was granted a land use right certificate U060645 in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ name of Mr. Pham Gia Nam. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ couple built a solid 2-storey house in 2002, and in 2005, they built a 3rd floor tum. Mr. Phac and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ brothers and sisters in Mr. Nam's family all knew about trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above construction by Mr. Nam and his wife, Hong, but no one had any comments. Thus, from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time trực tiếp bóng đá k+ certificate was granted (2001) until trực tiếp bóng đá k+ divorce of Mr. Nam and Ms. Hong (2009), Mr. Phac's family had no complaints about trực tiếp bóng đá k+ grant of land and building this house. That shows trực tiếp bóng đá k+ will of Mr. Phac's family to give Mr. Nam and Ms. Hong trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above land area. Therefore, Mr. Phac and Mr. Nam's statement that Mr. Nam arbitrarily declared trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land documents without Mr. Phac's knowledge has no basis for acceptance. Thus, there is evidence to confirm that Ms. Hong's testimony about Mr. Phac's family giving them trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above land area is well-founded.

Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fact that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Courts at all levels found that Mr. Nam went to make land documents that Mr. Phac did not know and that Ms. Hong declared that her husband's family had given it to them but there was no evidence to prove it, to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area of 80m2 in Van Hoa village, Van Tao commune, Thuong Tin district, Hanoi city is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property of Mr. Pham Gia Phac's household; at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same time, forcing Mr. Nam and Ms. Hong to return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land to Mr. Phac's family is not right. It is necessary to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above disputed land area is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ common property of Mr. Nam, Ms. Hong, and his wife; And when dividing, it must be considered that Mr. Nam has contributed more effort to divide according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ efforts of each party, and it is necessary to base on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ need for accommodation to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ items between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties to ensure trực tiếp bóng đá k+ rights of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigants.”

3

Precedent04/2016/ALon disputes over land use rights transfer contracts

In cases where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ common property of a husband and wife, only one person signs trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract to transfer trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate to another person; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other person does not sign trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract; If there are enough grounds to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferor has received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ full amount as agreed, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who did not sign trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract knows and uses trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate transfer money; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferee of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate has received, managed, and used that real estate publicly; if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person who does not sign trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract knows and has no objections, it must be determined that he or she agrees with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer of real estate.

“Regarding trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land purchase and sale contract dated April 26, 1996: trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer of houses and land took place in 1996. After buying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land, Mr. Tien and Mrs. Ty paid in full, received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land, repaired trực tiếp bóng đá k+ ground, repaired trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house, and let trực tiếp bóng đá k+ children live. Meanwhile, Mr. Ngu and Mrs. Phan's family still live on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining land area, adjacent to Mr. Tien and Mrs. Ty's house. According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ testimony of Mr. Ngu and Mrs. Phan's children, after selling trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land to Mrs. Ty and her husband, Mr. Ngu and Mrs. Phan divided trực tiếp bóng đá k+ gold among trực tiếp bóng đá k+ children. On trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other hand, after transferring and handing over trực tiếp bóng đá k+ real estate to Mr. Tien and Mrs. Ty, on April 26, 1996, Mr. Ngu also wrote a "commitment letter" with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ content of borrowing back trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferred house and land to live in when rebuilding a house on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining land; and in fact, Ms. Phan and Mr. Ngu, her husband and wife, used Ms. Ty and Mr. Tien's portion of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land when building trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house. Thus, there is a basis to determine that Ms. Phan knew that there was a transfer of house and land between Mr. Ngu, Mr. Tien, and Ms. Ty, and Ms. Phan agreed and jointly carried out trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transaction. Therefore, Ms. Phan's complaint that Mr. Ngu transferred trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property to Ms. Ty and her husband without her knowledge is unfounded."

4

Precedent05/2016/ALon inheritance dispute

In an inheritance dispute case, there is a litigant who is entitled to part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance and has contributed to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ management and improvement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance but does not agree to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance (because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for initiating lawsuits regarding inheritance has expired); there is no specific requirement to consider their contributions to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ management and improvement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance; If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court decides to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance among trực tiếp bóng đá k+ heirs, it must consider their contributions because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request not to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance is greater than trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request to consider their efforts.

"Mr. Hung died in 1978. According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law on Marriage and Family 1959, Mr. Trai is entitled to 1/7 of Mr. Hung's inheritance. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property Mr. Trai enjoys from Mr. Hung is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ common property of Mr. Trai and his wife, Mrs. Tu. Mrs. Tu died in 1980, Mrs. Tu's heirs include Mr. Trai and 03 children of Mr. Trai and Mrs. Tu, including Ms. Phuong.

Although Ms. Phuong is not trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first heir of Mr. Hung and Mr. Ngu, she is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ granddaughter of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ two men and has a lot of effort in managing and spending money to repair trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house; However, during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ process of resolving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case, Ms. Phuong did not request to consider trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effort because Ms. Phuong believed that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for inheritance division had expired and did not agree to return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land and property to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ heirs. Thus, Ms. Phuong's request to determine benefits is greater than trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request to consider effort; however, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance and appellate courts have not considered Ms. Phuong's efforts and have not thoroughly resolved trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigant's request."

5

Precedent06/2016/ALon inheritance dispute

In an inheritance dispute case where trực tiếp bóng đá k+ heir is overseas, if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court has performed a judicial mandate and collected evidence in accordance with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of law but still cannot determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ addresses of those people, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court will still resolve trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff's request; If trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance is determined, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance is identified, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person leaving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance does not have a will, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance will be resolved for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plaintiff according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of law; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance assets of absent people whose addresses cannot be determined will be temporarily handed over to those living in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country to manage and later hand over to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ absent heirs.

“trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of First Instance should have carried out judicial mandate procedures according to regulations and collected evidence for Mr. Duong and Ms. Thao, to clarify when these people died; and if these two dead people still have heirs, ask them about their views on resolving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case. Depending on each case, new evidence is used to resolve trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case according to regulations. If no further evidence can be collected, Mr. Hung's request for inheritance according to law must still be resolved; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance of Mr. Duong and Mrs. Thao will be temporarily handed over to those living in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ country to manage so that their heirs will have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to enjoy it according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ law in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ future, thus completely resolving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case. For those living in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house Ms. Tien sold, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ obligation to provide their names is Ms. Tien's. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance court's request for Mr. Hung to provide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ names of these people was not trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right one. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of First Instance said that Mr. Hung's failure to provide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ names and addresses of Mr. Duong's children, Ms. Thao, who bought Ms. Oanh's house, to suspend trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case was incorrect. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of Appeal should have annulled trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance decision and reassigned trực tiếp bóng đá k+ matter, but it is incorrect to uphold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance decision.”

6

Precedent07/2016/ALon civil case of dispute over home ownership and use rights

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house purchase contract was established in writing before July 1, 1991, with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ signature of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller, stating that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller had received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ full payment. Although trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer has not signed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract, they have been trực tiếp bóng đá k+ custodian of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract and have managed and stably used trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house for a long time without any dispute or demand for payment from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller.

“During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ dispute, Mr. Song presented trực tiếp bóng đá k+ two house sale documents mentioned above and Mr. Cao's paper authorizing Mr. Thanh to sell trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house. In fact, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Chien family has been managing both rooms on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ second floor of house 19 Thuoc Bac Street since 1972 until now. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Thanh family, interpreting at house 17 Thuoc Bac Street adjacent to it, has not disputed or demanded rent or house purchase payment. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ content of "Sale of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ second floor of House 19 Thuoc Bac Street" clearly states that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller has received full payment and there is no agreement between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties to issue a separate payment receipt. This serves as a receipt that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller confirms trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer has made trực tiếp bóng đá k+ payment. Although trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer has not signed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sales document, as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ custodian of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ document, it still holds value in determining trực tiếp bóng đá k+ seller's obligation to have received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ payment. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ court of first instance and appellate court considered that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ buyer did not sign trực tiếp bóng đá k+ sales document and failed to prove trực tiếp bóng đá k+ payment, thus denying trực tiếp bóng đá k+ accuser's request to recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house purchase contract as it did not ensure trực tiếp bóng đá k+ accuser's rights.

7

Precedent14/2017/ALon trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case requesting cancellation of land use rights transfer contract

- Precedent situation:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract for donating land use rights does not state trực tiếp bóng đá k+ donation conditions, but other related documents show that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have agreed on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ donation conditions and that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ donation conditions are legal.

- Legal solution:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conditions of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights donation contract and determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights donation contract is a conditional asset donation contract.

“[10] Thus, if there is evidence to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ local competent State agency has granted land to Mr. Quang Van P1 since 2003 (because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Courts at all levels have not yet collected trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land grant decision in 2003), Mr. Quang Van P1 has had trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal right to use trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above land area since 2003, so Mr. Quang Van P1 has trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to dispose of his property.

[11] However, Mr. Quang Van P1 said that his gift to Mr. Quang Van P2 and his wife was conditional, that is, Mr. Quang Van P2 and his wife had to build a house for him to live in and take care of him and his father and mother, but Mr. Quang Van P2 and his wife did not fulfill their commitment. Although Mr. Quang Van P2 did not admit that Mr. Quang Van P1's gift was conditional, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ authorization letter dated March 25, 2006 showed that Mr. Quang Van P1, who authorized Mr. Quang Van P2 to apply for a construction permit, was responsible for building a house on lot 379B for Mr. Quang Van P1 to live in, and is responsible for taking care of Mr. K and his wife (who are trực tiếp bóng đá k+ father and mother of Mr. Quang Van P1). In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Commitment dated October 12, 2006, Mr. Quang Van P2 wrote: "...I was given trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land by my father...I made this commitment with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ local government to build a house for my father and not to transfer it to anyone."

[12] Although trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract for donating land use rights does not state trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conditions, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above documents show that Mr. Quang Van P2 must build a house for Mr. Quang Van P1 to live in and take care of Mr. Quang Van P1 and Mr. Quang Van P1's parents.

8

Precedent15/2017/ALon trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case of land exchange contract dispute

- Precedent situation:

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigants voluntarily agreed verbally with each other on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conversion of agricultural land use rights before October 15, 1993 (trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effective date of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 24-L/CTN); Registered and declared trực tiếp bóng đá k+ changed land area and recorded it in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ cadastral book; it has been directly cultivated and used stably, continuously, and long term.

- Legal solution:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ oral agreement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigants on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conversion of agricultural land use rights to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigants have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to use trực tiếp bóng đá k+ changed land area.

“[1]... trực tiếp bóng đá k+ exchange of land between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties is on a voluntary basis, stemming from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ needs of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties for farming use. After trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land exchange, both parties registered and declared it, which was recorded in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Land Register for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land exchange area. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land has been directly cultivated and stably used continuously from 1992 until now. During trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use process, Mr. Nguyen Minh T relocated trực tiếp bóng đá k+ graves on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land and partially transformed it into a fish pond.

[2] In reality, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land exchange took place around February 1992. However, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ evidence in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ file shows that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties carried out trực tiếp bóng đá k+ registration and declaration procedures for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ exchange land area with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ local authorities in 1994. Other procedures, such as land Document transfer and tax declarations, have also been conducted since 1994. In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land exchange should have been recognized as reality to recognize that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to use trực tiếp bóng đá k+ renewed land area properly and in accordance with reality. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of First Instance and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of Appeal based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ testimony of Ms. Trinh Thi C to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ litigants temporarily exchanged land, thereby determining that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land exchange was illegal.
To cancel trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land exchange transaction and force trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties to demolish their houses and return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land to each other is incorrect and causes unnecessary disturbance to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties."

9

Precedent 16/2017/AL on civil cases of property inheritance disputes

- Precedent situation:

Inheritance is real estate that has been transferred by one of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ co-heirs. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other co-heirs knew and did not object to that transfer. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferred money was used to take care of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lives of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ co-heirs. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferee has been issued a land use right certificate.

- Legal solution:

In this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court must recognize trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land use rights transfer contract as legal, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transferred land area is no longer part of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance block but belongs to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ party's right to use. receive transfer.

“[2] In 1991, Ms. Phung Thi G transferred to Mr. Phung Van K an area of 131m2 out of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ total area of 398m2 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above land plot; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining land area of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ plot is 267.4m2. In 1999, Ms. Phung Thi G was granted a certificate of land use rights, with an area of 267.4 m2. Ms. Phung Thi G, Mr. Phung Van T, and his wife still manage and use this land. Mrs. Phung Thi G transferred trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land to Mr. Phung Van K, and Mrs. Phung Thi G's children all knew, but no one had any objections; Ms. Phung Thi G's children testified that Ms. Phung Thi G sold trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land to take care of her and her children's lives. Mr. Phung Van K has also been granted a land use right certificate by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ state agency. Therefore, there is a basis to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ daughters of Mrs. Phung Thi G agreed to transfer trực tiếp bóng đá k+ mentioned land area of 131 m2 to Mr. Phung Van K. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appellate court did not include trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land area sold by Mrs. Phung Thi G to Mr. Phung Van K in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ asset block for division, which is justified. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court of First Instance determined that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance was a total land area of 398m2 (including trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land sold to Mr. Phung Van K) for division to be incorrect."

10

Precedent21/2018/ALon fault and damage in unilateral termination of equipment lease agreement

:   A fixed-term property lease contract, with no agreement on contract termination conditions. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessee terminates trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract ahead of time without trực tiếp bóng đá k+ consent of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessor.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time between trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessee's written notice and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ termination of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract is so short that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessor cannot have another replacement contract within trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining term of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lease.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessor requires trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lessee to pay property rental for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining term of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract.

“[1] On April 10, 2006, Company D leased two steel locomotives to Joint Stock Company C and towed ships in and out at 10-10 port and Khe Day port, Quang Ninh, effective from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date of signing to December 31, 2006, according to Economic Contract 1141/HD-CNQN. In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract, there is no agreement on contract termination conditions. However, on August 17, 2006, Joint Stock Company C issued Document 2349/INDEVCO announcing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ termination of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract on August 20, 2006, with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reason that "there is no need to rent two locomotives." trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time taken by Joint Stock Company C to issue a written notice to terminate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract was too short, causing damage to Company D due to not being able to get another replacement contract immediately. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fault belongs to Joint Stock Company C, so it must be responsible for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ damage caused to Company D. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ actual damage that needs to be considered is trực tiếp bóng đá k+ vehicle rental fee for trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining period of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract."

11

Precedent22/2018/ALon non-breach of obligation to disclose pre-existing medical conditions in life insurance policy

Life insurance contracts, insurance rules, and insurance applications have unclear requirements for declaring trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insured's medical condition. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ information required to be declared is not trực tiếp bóng đá k+ basis for deciding whether trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties establish a life insurance contract.

“[4] At question 54 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Insurance Application dated March 25, 2009, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ question: For trực tiếp bóng đá k+ item "gastrointestinal ulcers, gastrointestinal bleeding, pancreatitis, colitis, frequent indigestion, difficulty swallowing, or disorders in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ stomach, intestines, liver, or gallbladder," Ms. H ticked trực tiếp bóng đá k+ box In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ consultation minutes 42/BV-99 of Hospital B dated September 3, 2009, Ms. H declared that she had a history of stomach pain for 2 years. According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Minutes of Consultation, Ms. H had stomach pain since September 3, 2007, before trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time Ms. H signed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Insurance Contract. Company C believes that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ term stomach disorders includes all diseases related to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ stomach, including stomach pain. However, at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeals trial, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ defendant could not provide any evidence to prove it, nor could it provide any scientific explanation to determine that stomach pain is a stomach disorder.

[8] Pursuant to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above legal provisions, in case trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parties have different interpretations that are unclear and difficult to understand, this Article must be interpreted in favor of Ms. H. Thus, there is not enough basis to determine that stomach pain is included in stomach disorders as presented by Company C.

[9] In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance application, there was no question about stomach pain. Thus, Company C's claim that Ms. H had a stomach ache but did not declare it was intentionally dishonest and violated trực tiếp bóng đá k+ obligation to provide information, which is unfounded.

[10] At question 61 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Insurance Application dated March 25, 2009: “In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ past 5 years, have you had diagnostic tests such as an X-ray, ultrasound, electrocardiogram, blood test, or biopsy? Or are you sick or sick with medical examination or treatment at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ hospital but not mentioned in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above section? Mrs. H checked trực tiếp bóng đá k+ box "no". At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ appeal court, Company C provided a biochemical blood test form dated September 22, 2008, with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ patient's name, Truong Thi H. Company C determined that this was a document collected by Company C in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ periodic health check records for employees of Kindergarten C, where Ms. H previously worked. Company C believes that on September 22, 2008, Ms. H had a blood test but did not declare it in question number 61. In trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance claim, Ms. H intentionally declared it untruthfully. Considering that, periodic health checks are carried out regularly by agencies and organizations. When participating in a periodic health check, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person being examined does not know and is not required to know what measures and methods trực tiếp bóng đá k+ medical examination and treatment organization has implemented. Furthermore, during a routine health checkup, Ms. H did not detect any signs of any disease, leading to Company C refusing to sign a contract with Ms. H. Therefore, there was not enough basis to determine that Ms. H felt abnormal in her body before taking a blood test and then purchasing insurance from Company C.

[11] Therefore, there is not enough basis to determine that Ms. H acted fraudulently when signing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance contract. There is no basis to determine whether Ms. H's marking trực tiếp bóng đá k+ "no" box in sections 54 and 61 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Insurance Application directly affected trực tiếp bóng đá k+ consideration of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Insurance Company to sign trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance contract with Ms. H or not.

12

Precedent23/2018/ALon validity of life insurance policy upon policyholder’s failure to pay insurance premiums due to insurer’s faults

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ life insurance request file shows that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer chooses trực tiếp bóng đá k+ method of collecting insurance premiums at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer's home address. When trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance premium payment deadline comes and during trực tiếp bóng đá k+ premium payment extension period, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance company's staff does not come to collect trực tiếp bóng đá k+ premium from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance buyer.

“[4] Based on trực tiếp bóng đá k+ life insurance claim file (notes 15–17), trực tiếp bóng đá k+ address of P Life Insurance Company Limited to collect fees is at house number 231, hamlet 3, commune B, district G, Ben Tre province, Mr. L's house. This is also consistent with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ testimony of Ms. N, who is an insurance sales and fee collection agent for P Life Insurance Company Limited.

[7] Considering that Mr. L signed an insurance contract in trực tiếp bóng đá k+ form of a life insurance request with an insurance level of 300,000,000 VND, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ fact that Mr. L has not paid trực tiếp bóng đá k+ second round of fees as analyzed above is not Mr. L's fault. Therefore, Ms. T's appeal request forcing P Life Insurance Company Limited to pay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance money when Mr. L dies due to an accident is well-founded to accept.

[8] Considering trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of P Life Insurance Company Limited that Mr. L did not pay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ second insurance premium by trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deadline of August 24, 2005 and that Mr. Therefore, Mr. L's insurance contract has expired, which is unfounded. As analyzed above, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ reason Mr. L did not pay trực tiếp bóng đá k+ insurance premium was because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ company staff did not come to collect trực tiếp bóng đá k+ premium. This is also clearly shown on page 5 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ information customers need to know, clearly stating that collecting fees at home includes collecting fees quarterly, every 6 months, annually, or if trực tiếp bóng đá k+ same address has 2 or more contracts, consistent with trực tiếp bóng đá k+ case of Mr. L, who bought 03 contracts of P Life Insurance Company Limited belonging to Mr. L, Ms. Therefore, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Trial Council did not accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ representative of P Life Insurance Company Limited, as well as trực tiếp bóng đá k+ proposal of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ lawyer to protect trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal rights and interests of P Life Insurance Company Limited.”

13

Precedent24/2018/ALon inheritance converted into property under trực tiếp bóng đá k+ legal ownership and use rights of individuals

Houses and lands are trực tiếp bóng đá k+ common property of husband and wife, and one person dies first. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ remaining person and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ heirs of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deceased have agreed to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house and land. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ division agreement does not violate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ rights of any heir.

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ division of houses and land has been done in reality and has been adjusted on land documents. Only after trực tiếp bóng đá k+ other person dies does a dispute arise.

“[4]…Mr. in which Mrs. H, Mrs. H1, and Mrs. H2 are 44.4m2. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ division has been carried out in reality and has been adjusted in land documents; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ division agreement does not violate trực tiếp bóng đá k+ rights of any heirs; no one disputes it, so there is a basis for determining trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house. trực tiếp bóng đá k+ land is no longer trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance of Mr. V and Mr. H but has been converted into legal land use rights for individuals. Therefore, Ms. H, Ms. H1, and Ms. H2 only have trực tiếp bóng đá k+ right to sue to reclaim 44.4m2 of land under legal use rights that were divided in 1991; trực tiếp bóng đá k+ property that was trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ parents no longer exists, so there is no basis to accept trực tiếp bóng đá k+ request to divide trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance of Mr. H and Mr. V."

14

Precedent25/2018/ALon not being subject to a deposit penalty due to objective reasons

A deposit contract to ensure trực tiếp bóng đá k+ conclusion of a house purchase and sale contract has an agreement that within a certain period of time, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit recipient must complete trực tiếp bóng đá k+ procedures to be granted a certificate of home ownership; If there is a violation, a fine must be imposed.

At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ end of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ agreed-upon term, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit recipient has not been granted a certificate of home ownership due to reasons beyond those of a competent state agency.

“[1]…In Article 5 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit contract, it is stated that, within 30 days from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ date of signing trực tiếp bóng đá k+ contract, Ms. H must complete trực tiếp bóng đá k+ procedures to be granted a certificate of ownership. For trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house mentioned above, a notarized sales contract will then be signed; If she violates trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above time limit, Ms. H will be fined an amount equivalent to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit of 2,000,000,000 VND. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ end of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ above period, Ms. H did not comply with her commitment, so Mr. L sued to request that Ms. H return trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit of 2,000,000,000 VND and fine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ deposit of 2,000,000,000 VND.

[3]…at trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time Mr. L deposited 2,000,000,000 VND to Ms. Truong Hong Ngoc H, Ms. H had received trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house but had not yet completed trực tiếp bóng đá k+ transfer procedures because trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Ho Chi Minh City Civil Enforcement Agency was managing all documents related to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ house.

[4]…If there are grounds to determine that trực tiếp bóng đá k+ civil judgment enforcement agency is late in transferring ownership to Ms. H, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ error leading to Ms. H's inability to fulfill her commitment to Mr. L is objective, and Ms.

15

Precedent26/2018/ALon determining trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time to start calculating trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for requesting division of inheritance as real estate

trực tiếp bóng đá k+ person leaving trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance as real estate died before trực tiếp bóng đá k+ announcement of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Inheritance Ordinance on August 30, 1990. At trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ first instance trial, Civil Code 91/2015/QH13 was in effect.

“[5] However, according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Clause 1, Article 623 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code 2015 (effective from January 1, 2017), trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for an heir to request a division of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ estate is 30 years for real estate, from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ time of opening trực tiếp bóng đá k+ inheritance.

[6] According to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Point d, Clause 1, Article 688 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code 2015, for civil transactions established before trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effective date of this Civil Code, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations applies according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of this Code.

[7] Thus, from trực tiếp bóng đá k+ effective date of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code 2015, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Court applies trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Article 623 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Law No. 91/2015/QH13to determine trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for cases of opening inheritance before January 1, 2017. Pursuant to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ provisions of Clause 4, Article 36 of trực tiếp bóng đá k+Ordinance No. 44-LCT/HDNN8dated August 30, 1990, and trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Civil Code 2015, in this case, trực tiếp bóng đá k+ statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit to divide Mr. T's estate among trực tiếp bóng đá k+ co-heirs still remains according to trực tiếp bóng đá k+ regulations of trực tiếp bóng đá k+ Law."